Carolina @ Giants...

MrChristo

The Zapper
Forum Member
Nov 11, 2001
4,414
5
0
Sexlexia...
...This game has me scratching my head so bad!!

But...I was still pretty convinced that the Panthers running game is VERY over-rated, so I went through their schedule.

They played only 3 teams all season who had a positive differential in their yards per carry!! ** (ie. Chicago gain 4.3, allow 3.7 = +0.6 dif)
[NYG are +0.8]

@ Miami (+0.6) lost 24-27 and had 84 less rushing yards.
@ TB (+0.5) won 34-14 and had 33 more rushing yards **
@ Chic (+0.6) lost 3-13 and had 67 less rushing yards.
v. TB (+0.5) lost 10-20 and had 32 less rushing yards.

** Now, the interesting thing about this game is that TB were playing catch up all game, and only ran the ball 17 times (to Caro's 31), so TB actually had a better ypc number.
...and I think this is a big reason why the Carolina running game is a bit over-blown.
They rank 19th in the league for yards (104.9), but 30th in ypc (3.4).
The reason being that a) they have played 6 games against teams in the bottom 8 for rush yards allowed. (Atl, NO, Buff, Jets)
b) They've really beat up these teams which hve skewed their stats.
c) Jumped out to big leads in as many as 8 games, and so have been settled to literally run out the second halves in those games.

imo, they've played VERY FEW teams all season who could put scoring pressure on them.
In fact, now I look!, they've played no-one in the top 9 for scoring. NE are 10th, and every other team is 14th or worse, so is it any wonder they have been able to run out games.
The Giants are 3rd in scoring @ 26.4 ppg.

Two other games in their schedule interest me...
...Lost 20-24 home to Dallas...had 143 less rushing yards!
...and...v. Jets at home which they won 30-3, yet still had 36 less rushing yards.

[** For the purpose of this exercise I didn't include Atlanta, who actually have a +0.1 differential, but their defense is horrible and Vick skews the offensive numbers too much to consider imo.]

Right then!!...What does it all mean??...

Basically I think (I've said 3 times now! :D) the Carolina running attack isn't anywhere near as good as it is made out to be.
Injuries or not, I think the Giants stuff the run and make Delhomme beat them with the pass.
Can he? Probably! :D ...but, I think it's pretty doubtful that even if they win, they will get out to a big, comfortable lead at any stage...
...so the bet for me in this game is NYG -24.5 yards rushing.

NYG?...In 9 home games have out-rushed;
+35 v. KC
+46 v. Dallas
+9 v. Philli (But McMahon got 31 of those, Westbrook just 66)
+112 v. Minni
+224 v.Wash
-94 v. Denver, but they hav the top legit running attack in the NFL (158 @ 4.7)
+133 v. St. L.
+30 v. NO
+93 v. 'Zona.

KC, Philli, Washington & Minni all have better rush differentials than Carolina.

Also (on completely the same path) looking pretty closely @ Foster < 78.5 yards rushing.
He's only topped this number twice all season, BOTH v. ATLANTA!
If he doesn't get 20 carries in this one, 80.5 looks a lot.
(2-0 in player props so far with Dillon <88.5 yards and Moss <90.5 receiving)

In all likelyhood that was just a huge load of dribble!...But I'm just filling in time like everyone else here! :mj14:

Good Luck all :cool:

edit: I'll add a quick bit on the Foster under...Since Foster has been the starter (since Davis got injured in wk. 11 @ Chicago), Foster has only gained more than 3.6 ypc TWICE. (You guessed it, both in the biggies v. Atl! :rolleyes: )
 
Last edited:

bombercoops

Registered User
Forum Member
Mar 17, 2003
1,845
4
0
44
oz
Plenty of spare time C? Well, if you don't like a side, take a prop to sweat! Hope tiki rushes hard for the both of us today in what is hopefully a giants win. Gl mate!
 

IX_Bender

Registered User
Forum Member
A few things to consider as an addendum to your workup:

1. Carolina's low rushing ypc can be directly attributed to former starter and future retired running back Stephen Davis. This pilefinder had a 3.0 ypc before injury. He's out for the year and his career most likely.

2. The starting back for Carolina in this game, Foster, is hobbled but has much more acceleration and burst. His numbers are again deflated due to playing behind Davis much of the year. Having more carries for Foster leads to more chances of breaking a long run.

3. All three starting linebackers for the NY Giants are out (Emmons, Blackburn, Pierce) As of Thursday night, the Giants starting linebackers look to be Alonzo Jackson, Kevin Lewis and Nick Greisen, and if you have no idea who these players are, you?re in good company because many New York season ticket holders couldn?t pick them out of a line-up.

4. The Panthers rush defense has been sound this year with only a few runners turning in big games, but Tiki has been on fire. Manning is still starting his first playoff game of his career. It?s going to take him some time to get comfortable and adjust to the speed on the field. That should mean a ton of Tiki, at least early.

5. I run an independent statistical breakdown of the teams before the snap of the ball. My mathematical analysis has NYG with the rushing edge over CAR by 41 yards. Obviously, thats a good indicator but not absolute by any means.


Its refreshing to read some statistical breakdown and analysis of the game, especially coming from someone outside the states. What book did you find the rushing numbers for your bet on NE running back Dillon?

Congrats on your prop success so far and good luck with todays games.

-Bender
 

Mjolnir

Registered User
Forum Member
May 15, 2003
3,747
11
0
S. CAL.
wow, thats alot of work. appreciate it. the book i use doesnt have this prop. i feel like i've been teased. lol
:mj07: :mj07:
 
Last edited:
Bet on MyBookie
Top