Mich is 10-4 in games with games under 130 points scored - The cuse are 3-6 - SYR WAS ON A 6-0 RUN WITH GMS UNDER 130 WHEN THIS WAS POSTED.... 3-6 WAS NOT AN OPTION .. NOT EVEN CLOSE.... WHERE DO YOU GET 3-6 ???? I DON'T KNOW WHAT THERE RECORD IS IN GMS UNDER 130 BUT IT'S NOT 3-6.... THEY HAD JUST WON 6 ST WHEN < 130 WAS SCORED ....
Bryan honestly what the hell are you trying to say -You are correct in all loses THEY ARE POOR GAMES THEY LOSE NOT WIN READ MY POST AGAIN GUY what i meant was losses - by the way almost called the score on the head
Mich is 10-4 in games with games under 130 points scored - The cuse are 3-6 - Mich has no problem being patient and playing in a low scoring game. The fallacy is the cuse like playing this way. They do not - The cuse do much better in games around 140 - I see a Mich 64-59- The cuse need this game to be slow paced because MI will eat them up. But unlike other toop efficient o wise teams -Mi is just as efficient in a slow paced d game as fast paced. The cuse need a slow paced and match that with efficiency. In these losses in low scoring games- The cuse efficiency drops to the bottom 20% in the country.
__________________