Charles manson banned!!!

[spibble spab]

Charles manson has been banned right after george bush has won! what the hell?

over 1100 posts and he just got banned

Right after his man won?

whats up with that mad jack?
what was the reason?

 

[spibble spab]

last post manson replied to ocelot's post sating he wanted to bash mansons head in with a baseball bat. to that mansom replied"
saying something about manson putting his nuts on ocelot's chin
then manson got banned! why didnt ocelot get banned for threatening to take charleys head off?

Very unfair administrator!!!!

 

[spibble spab]

Was he actually banned right after bush won? is that the reason?

Booooooo!

 

[kosar]

At least you can still use this other user name, dipshit.

 

[spibble spab]

glad to see your personal attacks are still strong.

maybe your just mad because manson dominated this room for eight months. the entire time. showing his nuts despite the plethora of liberal opposition in this room. he said bush will win, and lookie here what happened. KOSARS CONCESSION SPEECH TO FOLLOW

 

[MadJack]

it's 3 day ban for now. i should have banned him weeks ago. all he does is attack other members, critisize other members, bash other members, insult other members and on and on and on. want to know why? search his posts and you will have the answer. i'm sick of it. as far as the attacks against him goes, he was asking for it so he could keep the bashing rolling. he contributes nothing constructive to this site at all. if he acted like he has been in my house i would have kicked him out a long time ago and i think of this place like my house.

 

[treynolds]

Really? I cant believe he would have been banned for that. I hope that isnt the case. If it is, it isnt fair. Alot of the democrats have been quiet on here since yesterday afternoon. I wonder why?

 

[BahamaMama]

Jack, is mine for the $3.27 American crack?

 

[Scott4USC]

I come in and out of this political forum so I have not followed all of his posts but Manson does provide substance behind his bashing/opinion. I have seen him post links supporting his opinion or giving reasons behind his opinion. I agree he bashes but others bashed him as well and often had nothing constructive in their post about the subject.

What is worse?

Manson bashing but adding his opinion with support behind it. Objective and subjective support.

OR

Others bashing him and not even talking about the subject at hand. A post solely focused on bashing.

 

[spibble spab]

what about the guy who threatened to bash mansons head in with a bat? why isnt he banned? not a very clear line we're walking. Its too much of a coincidence he got banned right after the election, manson was defending himself. You must know that this political forum gets heated and i can read through the threads
about everyone bashing each other. including one guy threatening manson and myself. was he banned? no. hypocrite

its ok for kosar and I love wr to say whatever they want. probably because of your political affiliation. if you apply to what manson said and compare it to everyone else, half of the users here would be banned. why do you have icons with smilies with middle fingers stuck up and smilies humping each other. is that what you would have in your "house"?
BIG JOKE!!! VERY UNFAIR!!

 

[kosar]

what about the guy who threatened to bash mansons head in with a bat? why isnt he banned? not a very clear line we're walking. Its too much of a coincidence he got banned right after the election, manson was defending himself. You must know that this political forum gets heated and i can read through the threads
about everyone bashing each other. including one guy threatening manson and myself. was he banned? no. hypocrite

its ok for kosar and I love wr to say whatever they want. probably because of your political affiliation. if you apply to what manson said and compare it to everyone else, half of the users here would be banned. why do you have icons with smilies with middle fingers stuck up and smilies humping each other. is that what you would have in your "house"?
BIG JOKE!!! VERY UNFAIR!!

Fu*k off, whiner.

 

[spibble spab]

At least you can still use this other user name, dipshit.

how come kosars not banned, applying your new rule. calling manson names on a DAILY BASIS.

 

[ocelot]

Guess you guys should start your own website if you don't like it.

Thanks Jack. Lost my temper. Don't blame you if you ban me but Manson is the poorest winner I've ever seen.

 

[Scott4USC]

Here is an example. Manson and I were posting in my thread and here is a post Eddie Haskell posted. Does this post help the forum? Why is he not banned? What did he offer productive to the thread?

http://madjacksports.com/forum/showthread.php?t=164266

Eddie Haskell post.......

I cast my vote for this thread as the most pathetic, inconsequential, and meaningless thread ever posted here at Madjacks involving a back and forth discussion over a bet between two individuals.

One, a pathetic loser gambler, who has made a bet on a political election and is looking for some type of feel good, moral support from anyone for his decision since he is apparently not all that confident in it. And, two, a complete blithering idiot who provides such moral support by saying he has nothing to worry about as this election was over months ago.

The other explanation for this thread is that this idiot is trying to show his bravado by placing a "large" bet on a close election in an attempt to show how confident he is in his guy and to further attempt to persuade anyone who is on the fence as to the confidence he has in his boy getting reelected, hence, the "large" bet.

I'll stop writing now, as I want to continue to be entertained by future posts as we watch Scott and Chuck giving each other mutual blow jobs.

Eddie

Then in that same thread, Scott-Atlanta posted this and this was his whole post.

West Coast Scott

Support this

:thefinger :thefinger :thefinger

Chucky

Your a coward.
Here is one for you also

:thefinger

These are productive posts? These posts are welcomed in your house?

 

[treynolds]

Seems very unfair to me but it is jacks site, i enjoy reading mansons opinions it wasnt his fault that those people kept coming back and bashing him. What is he suppose to do sit there in take it. Ive never seen anyone who uses this site do that.

 

[MadJack]

manson deserved it a long time ago and it's my fault for not banning him sooner. it has nothing to do with bush winning, gimme a break. what exactly have you contributed to madjack's *SPORTS* forums? i should have listened to some other people and never opened this forum. all it did was create resentment between members.

 

[dr. freeze]

yeah i have a hard time seeing why Manson gets banned with the way Haskill insults on a daily basis as well as ILOVEWR with his anti-American rhetoric

 

[treynolds]

Just seems hard to justify you doing it today jack

 

[Mjolnir]

i agree freeze
eddie and ilovewr are pretty hatefull. how many times has eddie commented about someones wife or family member when he doesn't like them. pure vitriol. commenting on someones wife would have serious concequences in person and he does it daily.
just my opinion.

 

[MadJack]

ok, you guys are right....it wasn't fair. if his head rolls, many others should have too.

he's unbanned.

i'm closing this politics forum on monday so bash away. if it filters over into the handicap forums, that is a completely different story.

have fun