See Dicks flying Supreme Court Judges, at least one on hunting trips now. Of course with our money. Needs to work on them a little. Dick wants to get a fair and just ruleing to his hidden meetings. The ones he won't tell who were at. Even tho we have open meeting laws. But Dick only has his laws. And yes I hate to say it. He's worse then Clinton. And now his old company Hal, is in more hot water from when he was the CEO. This guy is a natural crook. He Does no justice to Bush at all.
Cheney don't bribe that Judge!
- Thread starter djv
- Start date
I'll ditto that
I'll ditto that
Not because I am a moderate conservative, but b/c I get sick of reading these whiny ass political posts on a daily basis. I think I'm gonna have to stop reading all posts from him. Even in the general discussion forum Madjack's is a sports forum not a political forum.
kneifl
I'll ditto that
ctownguy said:djv, you are entitled to your opinion and so am I, YOUR A REAL DUMB ASS LIBERAL JERK
Not because I am a moderate conservative, but b/c I get sick of reading these whiny ass political posts on a daily basis. I think I'm gonna have to stop reading all posts from him. Even in the general discussion forum Madjack's is a sports forum not a political forum.
kneifl
Re: I'll ditto that
Re: I'll ditto that
Ok read this carefully:
"General Discussion Forum
Discussions about everything else and Non-Handicapping Issues ."
He is not doing anything wrong by posting his opinions. If you don't like it, don't read his posts!
So simple
Re: I'll ditto that
kneifl said:
Ok read this carefully:
"General Discussion Forum
Discussions about everything else and Non-Handicapping Issues ."
He is not doing anything wrong by posting his opinions. If you don't like it, don't read his posts!
So simple
I see ctownguy showed his age. And thanks for the new name. I always said when someone has nothing to say they just call people names. But then they were always the first to choke.
Ya know guys, it is absolutely true that we don't have to respond to all threads and I usually don't until I have had enough of the same crap, then I have to say something because I have an opinion also.
Mr Hockey, no one said he is doing anything wrong, he has every right to be a dumb ass liberal jerk.
It is real easy to say just don't read his posts, how ridiculous is that. The whole idea of a forum like this is to express ideas and opinions, so why wouldn't I read everything.
Hey djv has had some intelligient posts albiet only a few, but I'm interested in what the other side has to say and how they view things, but like kneifl stated everytime you go to read one of djv's threads it is the same thing. A whinning baiting thread to just piss off the right, nothing with real substance.
Usually when someone starts a thread it is for a reason, not just to increase your number of posts. So I had had enough and stated my opinion as Mr hockey so aptly stated:
Ok read this carefully:
"General Discussion Forum
Discussions about everything else and Non-Handicapping Issues ."
So I said my piece and I will still read all of djv's posts hoping I find he has something intelligeint to say
Mr Hockey, no one said he is doing anything wrong, he has every right to be a dumb ass liberal jerk.
It is real easy to say just don't read his posts, how ridiculous is that. The whole idea of a forum like this is to express ideas and opinions, so why wouldn't I read everything.
Hey djv has had some intelligient posts albiet only a few, but I'm interested in what the other side has to say and how they view things, but like kneifl stated everytime you go to read one of djv's threads it is the same thing. A whinning baiting thread to just piss off the right, nothing with real substance.
Usually when someone starts a thread it is for a reason, not just to increase your number of posts. So I had had enough and stated my opinion as Mr hockey so aptly stated:
Ok read this carefully:
"General Discussion Forum
Discussions about everything else and Non-Handicapping Issues ."
So I said my piece and I will still read all of djv's posts hoping I find he has something intelligeint to say
Hey Ctown
Hey Ctown
How about stating your opinion about DJV being an idiot, and then explain why you think he's an idiot? Simply calling DJV a "Dumbass Liberal Jerk" is a bit childish, don't you think? I doubt you come here just to call people childish names, so show a little intelligence yourself. Maybe DJV consistently whining (in your opinion) is a little childish, but at least he's offering a few points to the board.
IF Dick Cheney is doing what DJ says he's doing, isn't that a little suspect? Wouldn't even you agree that your tax dollars going toward Supreme Court Justice's flying around the country/world is mis-spent money, in a budget situation that's god-awful. Why don't you refute what DJV's saying about good old Mr. Cheney, with a few facts? My guess is you can't, otherwise you already would have.
Hey Ctown
How about stating your opinion about DJV being an idiot, and then explain why you think he's an idiot? Simply calling DJV a "Dumbass Liberal Jerk" is a bit childish, don't you think? I doubt you come here just to call people childish names, so show a little intelligence yourself. Maybe DJV consistently whining (in your opinion) is a little childish, but at least he's offering a few points to the board.
IF Dick Cheney is doing what DJ says he's doing, isn't that a little suspect? Wouldn't even you agree that your tax dollars going toward Supreme Court Justice's flying around the country/world is mis-spent money, in a budget situation that's god-awful. Why don't you refute what DJV's saying about good old Mr. Cheney, with a few facts? My guess is you can't, otherwise you already would have.
DCPlayer what I posted was true 100%. Wall Street not a liberal paper at all had the artical as well as many others plus all majior networks. Yes even Fox.
Now Ctownguy says hey your a liberial jerk. Ya thats why I dont want my money spent by politicians for there fishing trips. I want the spender we have in DC. To stop all these spending programs he keeps offering up. Im more consevative then you maybe when it comes to our money and the way it's getting thrown around. Maybe your the liberial F??? or what ever you called me. I want that dam border controlled and no free passes for all those in this country that are not legal to get out. Ya call me liberial. Only thing im close to liberial about is asking for honest reasons why were in Iraq other then all the half truths and BS we been given. Also by not tieing myself to either party when I vote. I can use a open mind and think for my self who to vote for . I don't need some party telling me how. And when soemone runs the country in to the largest Deficit we ever had . Explain to the American people how in the long run there going to pay dearly for it. Honest and truth we asked of Clinton. Hey we should get the same from any of them including Bush.
Now Ctownguy says hey your a liberial jerk. Ya thats why I dont want my money spent by politicians for there fishing trips. I want the spender we have in DC. To stop all these spending programs he keeps offering up. Im more consevative then you maybe when it comes to our money and the way it's getting thrown around. Maybe your the liberial F??? or what ever you called me. I want that dam border controlled and no free passes for all those in this country that are not legal to get out. Ya call me liberial. Only thing im close to liberial about is asking for honest reasons why were in Iraq other then all the half truths and BS we been given. Also by not tieing myself to either party when I vote. I can use a open mind and think for my self who to vote for . I don't need some party telling me how. And when soemone runs the country in to the largest Deficit we ever had . Explain to the American people how in the long run there going to pay dearly for it. Honest and truth we asked of Clinton. Hey we should get the same from any of them including Bush.
i think
i think
that before you call guys crooks,you should have your "ducks"(lol) in a row.....
djv has a tendency to "jump the gun" so to speak on many issues....
like this...
djv
Senior Member
Registered: Nov 2000
Location:
Posts: 7710
100 Days In Jail For Murder
A two time DWI ex Congress/Govenor gets 100 days for running a stop sign drunk. Killeing the other driver. He was lucky to have a conservative judge. Worked well for him being a republican. A jury found this man guilty. Hard To believe 100 days. His defence was he had a diabetic reaction. Yes that can happen with a 1.7 blood level twice the .80 . He was drunk and the jury didn't buy it. How the hell does a judge get off givieng 100 days.
eddie haskell
Registered: Feb 2001
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio USA
Posts: 866
DJV:
I often agree with your posts but, not sure on this one. I've tried to be consistent on this board (and for that matter, in my life) whether or not it supports my belief system but I do not like to base my conclusions on the media's spin and sensational headlines. Again, they look for eye grabbing sound bites that the morons of this country can use to support their own positions. My point is there may very well have been a valid reason for the imposition by the judge of what appears to be a very light sentence for a death case.
We were not in the courtroom, did not hear the evidence, did not hear the mitigating factors and therefore shouldn't jump to conclusions that the verdict and sentence showed favoritism based on political beliefs. Although it does smell of political bias, I cant yet condemn the judge for this sentence. Am I snickering when I read that article, yeah but I gotta give the judge the benefit of the doubt untill I hear otherwise.
Ed
__________________
"Ward, don't you think you were a little hard on the Beaver last night?"
June Cleaver, 1963
djv
Senior Member
Registered: Nov 2000
Location:
Posts: 7710
1.7 was his blood level 2 hours after the accedent. Thats more then just a tad over .80. I agree it should have been left at 1. But the man did not learn very well since it was his second DWI.
loophole
Senior Member
Registered: Jul 1999
Location: nc
Posts: 1833
djv, haven't followed the case closely, but i believe the charge janklow pled guilty to was some form of reduced-culpability manslaughter. the state did not allege that the accident was alcohol related. if they had he would have been charged with a more serious offense, and almost certainly would have received a heavier sentence. i believe the only allegations of misconduct were speeding and running a stop sign.
bjfinste
Senior Member
Registered: Mar 2001
Location: Valley Ranch, TX
Posts: 894
I used to live in that state so I've followed this case with some interest. I was never given the impression that alcohol was a factor. Neither the paper I worked for nor the Sioux Falls Argus Leader reported him having alcohol in his system as far as I know (then again I am in Texas now but I've tried to keep tabs on it). According to the Argus timeline, "Highway Patrol officials say there is no evidence of alcohol or drugs involved." Where did you hear booze was involved?
I voted against this guy in the last election, but I can honestly say that people who supported either party, at least in my experience, really seemed to like him. After all, he was state gov. for 16 years. He seemed to cross party lines for the people of the state and really cared about the good of SD.
He does deserve punishment for what he did and I think he got that. If alcohol had been involved, like loophole said, I would just about guarantee that he would've gotten a tougher sentence.
djv
Senior Member
Registered: Nov 2000
Location:
Posts: 7710
****In correct info. He was not drunk. He did in his past have a DUI because it was right at .80. So it was not part of this at all. However he had two other speeding tickets before this happen. He ran a stop sign at high speed. Hit a killed another man. He was knowen to like to drive fast. So this was some degree of manslaugther. Im still wondering how you get 100 days. In fact they now say after 30 days he can spend just nights in the jail.
Of course a civil suite is in the makings. Cant blame those folks.
and this one.....
Independent Panel By Bush?....by djv
Now here is a real crock of chit. A panel to investigate WMD and our poor intelligence cathering. Bush wants to name those on the panel and be deeply involved. Or even be the head of this investagtion. That tells me just about all I need to know about want they dont want out in the open. My guess is they will find no info to after the election. I believe thats a Lock.
This would have been like letting Clinton investgate himself.....
....................................................................................
well as it turns out,the co-chairmen of the panel are a republican judge named silberman and (oh my god!)DEMOCRAT...I REPEAT DEMOCRAT and former governore of virginia chuck robb(whom i believe is married to one of the johnson girls....as in lyndon johnson)....
also appointed were john mccain(an absolute straight shooter and not a huge bush fan) and lloyd cutler....former white house counsel to jummy carter and BILL CLINTON.......
DJV HAS THE RIGHT TO POST UNTIL THE COWS COME HOME(AS MR HOCKEY CORRECTLY STATED)......
but,the guy is very emotional and posts an awful lot of incorrect info...off the cuff stuff that quite often is flat out incorrect and is only meant as inflammatory....
i have no problem with anyone posting info from any point of view...eddie haskell and kosar,i have to admit,are 2 of my favorite posters,even though i seldom agree with them...they make me think and are excellent in debate...i enjoy them immensely....
but,djv has every right to post as he pleases(as long as jack`s o.k. with it)..
but it seems that djv just tries to inflame people with, in many cases,ridiculous and incorrect proclamations....
so,he gets negative responses.....if you are going to "spam" the board with posts that are intended to raise people`s blood pressure,that`s going to happen....
just,occasionally,djv,do a little research...get your facts straight...look before you leap....cut down on the name calling...the jumping to conclusions...
then you`ll get appropriate responses...
g.l.
i think
that before you call guys crooks,you should have your "ducks"(lol) in a row.....
djv has a tendency to "jump the gun" so to speak on many issues....
like this...
djv
Senior Member
Registered: Nov 2000
Location:
Posts: 7710
100 Days In Jail For Murder
A two time DWI ex Congress/Govenor gets 100 days for running a stop sign drunk. Killeing the other driver. He was lucky to have a conservative judge. Worked well for him being a republican. A jury found this man guilty. Hard To believe 100 days. His defence was he had a diabetic reaction. Yes that can happen with a 1.7 blood level twice the .80 . He was drunk and the jury didn't buy it. How the hell does a judge get off givieng 100 days.
eddie haskell
Registered: Feb 2001
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio USA
Posts: 866
DJV:
I often agree with your posts but, not sure on this one. I've tried to be consistent on this board (and for that matter, in my life) whether or not it supports my belief system but I do not like to base my conclusions on the media's spin and sensational headlines. Again, they look for eye grabbing sound bites that the morons of this country can use to support their own positions. My point is there may very well have been a valid reason for the imposition by the judge of what appears to be a very light sentence for a death case.
We were not in the courtroom, did not hear the evidence, did not hear the mitigating factors and therefore shouldn't jump to conclusions that the verdict and sentence showed favoritism based on political beliefs. Although it does smell of political bias, I cant yet condemn the judge for this sentence. Am I snickering when I read that article, yeah but I gotta give the judge the benefit of the doubt untill I hear otherwise.
Ed
__________________
"Ward, don't you think you were a little hard on the Beaver last night?"
June Cleaver, 1963
djv
Senior Member
Registered: Nov 2000
Location:
Posts: 7710
1.7 was his blood level 2 hours after the accedent. Thats more then just a tad over .80. I agree it should have been left at 1. But the man did not learn very well since it was his second DWI.
loophole
Senior Member
Registered: Jul 1999
Location: nc
Posts: 1833
djv, haven't followed the case closely, but i believe the charge janklow pled guilty to was some form of reduced-culpability manslaughter. the state did not allege that the accident was alcohol related. if they had he would have been charged with a more serious offense, and almost certainly would have received a heavier sentence. i believe the only allegations of misconduct were speeding and running a stop sign.
bjfinste
Senior Member
Registered: Mar 2001
Location: Valley Ranch, TX
Posts: 894
I used to live in that state so I've followed this case with some interest. I was never given the impression that alcohol was a factor. Neither the paper I worked for nor the Sioux Falls Argus Leader reported him having alcohol in his system as far as I know (then again I am in Texas now but I've tried to keep tabs on it). According to the Argus timeline, "Highway Patrol officials say there is no evidence of alcohol or drugs involved." Where did you hear booze was involved?
I voted against this guy in the last election, but I can honestly say that people who supported either party, at least in my experience, really seemed to like him. After all, he was state gov. for 16 years. He seemed to cross party lines for the people of the state and really cared about the good of SD.
He does deserve punishment for what he did and I think he got that. If alcohol had been involved, like loophole said, I would just about guarantee that he would've gotten a tougher sentence.
djv
Senior Member
Registered: Nov 2000
Location:
Posts: 7710
****In correct info. He was not drunk. He did in his past have a DUI because it was right at .80. So it was not part of this at all. However he had two other speeding tickets before this happen. He ran a stop sign at high speed. Hit a killed another man. He was knowen to like to drive fast. So this was some degree of manslaugther. Im still wondering how you get 100 days. In fact they now say after 30 days he can spend just nights in the jail.
Of course a civil suite is in the makings. Cant blame those folks.
and this one.....
Independent Panel By Bush?....by djv
Now here is a real crock of chit. A panel to investigate WMD and our poor intelligence cathering. Bush wants to name those on the panel and be deeply involved. Or even be the head of this investagtion. That tells me just about all I need to know about want they dont want out in the open. My guess is they will find no info to after the election. I believe thats a Lock.
This would have been like letting Clinton investgate himself.....
....................................................................................
well as it turns out,the co-chairmen of the panel are a republican judge named silberman and (oh my god!)DEMOCRAT...I REPEAT DEMOCRAT and former governore of virginia chuck robb(whom i believe is married to one of the johnson girls....as in lyndon johnson)....
also appointed were john mccain(an absolute straight shooter and not a huge bush fan) and lloyd cutler....former white house counsel to jummy carter and BILL CLINTON.......
DJV HAS THE RIGHT TO POST UNTIL THE COWS COME HOME(AS MR HOCKEY CORRECTLY STATED)......
but,the guy is very emotional and posts an awful lot of incorrect info...off the cuff stuff that quite often is flat out incorrect and is only meant as inflammatory....
i have no problem with anyone posting info from any point of view...eddie haskell and kosar,i have to admit,are 2 of my favorite posters,even though i seldom agree with them...they make me think and are excellent in debate...i enjoy them immensely....
but,djv has every right to post as he pleases(as long as jack`s o.k. with it)..
but it seems that djv just tries to inflame people with, in many cases,ridiculous and incorrect proclamations....
so,he gets negative responses.....if you are going to "spam" the board with posts that are intended to raise people`s blood pressure,that`s going to happen....
just,occasionally,djv,do a little research...get your facts straight...look before you leap....cut down on the name calling...the jumping to conclusions...
then you`ll get appropriate responses...
g.l.
Last edited:
I corrected my mistake with the speeding that killed a person. No bozze involved. 100 days was not enough. But maybe liberials would say it was ok. Run a stop sign killed someone get 100 days. I like 15 to 20 years better.
And yes Bush will be involved with this panel they are forming. UNLESS he changed his mind yesterday. And yes if it had been Clinton. Lets be fair the rights of this world would have went nuts. Totaly out of there minds. My remarks were way short of that.
And yes Bush will be involved with this panel they are forming. UNLESS he changed his mind yesterday. And yes if it had been Clinton. Lets be fair the rights of this world would have went nuts. Totaly out of there minds. My remarks were way short of that.
ctownguy said:Ya know guys, it is absolutely true that we don't have to respond to all threads and I usually don't until I have had enough of the same crap, then I have to say something because I have an opinion also.
Mr Hockey, no one said he is doing anything wrong, he has every right to be a dumb ass liberal jerk.
It is real easy to say just don't read his posts, how ridiculous is that. The whole idea of a forum like this is to express ideas and opinions, so why wouldn't I read everything.
Hey djv has had some intelligient posts albiet only a few, but I'm interested in what the other side has to say and how they view things, but like kneifl stated everytime you go to read one of djv's threads it is the same thing. A whinning baiting thread to just piss off the right, nothing with real substance.
Usually when someone starts a thread it is for a reason, not just to increase your number of posts. So I had had enough and stated my opinion as Mr hockey so aptly stated:
Ok read this carefully:
"General Discussion Forum
Discussions about everything else and Non-Handicapping Issues ."
So I said my piece and I will still read all of djv's posts hoping I find he has something intelligeint to say
No offense but you sound childish. I mean everytime I turn around of late, whether I agree with your feeling or not, you are resorting to name calling & you are an adult. I expect the childish name calling from children.
Maybe you are too clueless to get it but there was nothing wrong with what I said to the poster. He is complaining about djv's posts but continues to read them. It is like someone who is fat complaining about the Burger King down the block from school, who exactly is forcing that person to go there? No one but themselves. Get it now
Let it be known
Let it be known
That I was just venting in this thread b/c I read this kind of crap constantly from djv. I will no longer read HIS posts, however, I still like to read other peoples posts from start to finish because they may have good points to bring up backed by facts - both Conservatives and Liberal point of views. A djv point of view is ALWAYS in them, and I never see any facts to back them up, just whining and crying about this and that about the conservative party.
I think I got my point across crystal clear the first time. As for this thread, gardenweasel made the best reply in it and it made the most sense.
I have nothing else to say about this subject and maybe someone should lock this up.
kneifl
Let it be known
That I was just venting in this thread b/c I read this kind of crap constantly from djv. I will no longer read HIS posts, however, I still like to read other peoples posts from start to finish because they may have good points to bring up backed by facts - both Conservatives and Liberal point of views. A djv point of view is ALWAYS in them, and I never see any facts to back them up, just whining and crying about this and that about the conservative party.
I think I got my point across crystal clear the first time. As for this thread, gardenweasel made the best reply in it and it made the most sense.
I have nothing else to say about this subject and maybe someone should lock this up.
kneifl
Re: Let it be known
Re: Let it be known
While I disagree with your first post in this thread, I respect the fact you acted mature about the whole situation.
Good luck to you on your wagers.
Re: Let it be known
kneifl said:
While I disagree with your first post in this thread, I respect the fact you acted mature about the whole situation.
Good luck to you on your wagers.
I have to wholeheartely agree with gardenweasel, I guess I could have expressed myself a little better, but like I stated before it was a knee jerk reaction to what djv always writes.
Garden expressed it perfectly and as far as the name calling, I'm only expressing my opinion of what I think of djv or anybody else when the only thing I have to go on is the guy's written word and I feel that is a very fair reaction.
In Mr hockey's eyes my response was childish and that is his opinion, but let me make this clear, I was not calling out Mr hockey at all, just trying to explain my posts. Call it childish, I think of it as calling them like I read 'em.
And just for the record, I used to answer these liberal bashing conservative posts with long draw out opinions, facts, etc just like Dogs that bark does, but I don't have the time or the inclination to keep taking my time up to try and educate the left. That's why I like dog's and garden's posts and many others that still engage in this type of rhetoric.
A fact is a fact and it only needs to be presented once, it's the lie that has to be told over and over to get it across, sound familar you liberals.
Garden expressed it perfectly and as far as the name calling, I'm only expressing my opinion of what I think of djv or anybody else when the only thing I have to go on is the guy's written word and I feel that is a very fair reaction.
In Mr hockey's eyes my response was childish and that is his opinion, but let me make this clear, I was not calling out Mr hockey at all, just trying to explain my posts. Call it childish, I think of it as calling them like I read 'em.
And just for the record, I used to answer these liberal bashing conservative posts with long draw out opinions, facts, etc just like Dogs that bark does, but I don't have the time or the inclination to keep taking my time up to try and educate the left. That's why I like dog's and garden's posts and many others that still engage in this type of rhetoric.
A fact is a fact and it only needs to be presented once, it's the lie that has to be told over and over to get it across, sound familar you liberals.
StevieD that may be. But I had hopes Bush would see the light.
As for what I post. If anyone gives a chit or not is not the point. I learn this chit for months/years here when they cried about Clinton and his wife over and over and over. And they still do. It's all his fault everything. Even when the Prez or Cheney get caught up in soemthing that looks alittle strange. The answer is what it's been for 4 years. Clinton must have done something. So I think it's ok if we remind folks here of all the chit going on today and last week. And guess what Clinton is not there anymore. I just guessed thats whay everyone liked. We might as well do it for this guy like we did Clinton. Just like I brought up this commission the prez is forming. Good idea. But someone else should do it. I know just what would have been said if Clinton had did it. And now we don't get answers from this commission till March 2005. Four months after the election of course. Now I can tell you if that was Clinton the right would be near death threats with there remarks. But dont say anything about there boy George.
If anyone has followed the polls lately even those from fox news. You know why he changed his mind on this commisssion. He was dead against this till the polls told him another story. So folks you know it's all in the game so why act so dam far out about it. They play it well in DC. That would be right and left both. It's just you guys on the right seem to have a hard time undestanding that. you seem to think the republicans are some kind of saints. You must have for gotten Nixon. And Ollie North. Oh hell plame that on Clinton to. Hell no go back to Johnson. so to you thqt missed the 3/4 years of all kinds of chit to do with Clinton. Welcome to the chit of Bush. Only one differance. I will say good thing about Bush. If I think I should. the right seems to have ahard time sayong anything good about anyone other then Bush. Oh well as you grow older you get smarter.
As for what I post. If anyone gives a chit or not is not the point. I learn this chit for months/years here when they cried about Clinton and his wife over and over and over. And they still do. It's all his fault everything. Even when the Prez or Cheney get caught up in soemthing that looks alittle strange. The answer is what it's been for 4 years. Clinton must have done something. So I think it's ok if we remind folks here of all the chit going on today and last week. And guess what Clinton is not there anymore. I just guessed thats whay everyone liked. We might as well do it for this guy like we did Clinton. Just like I brought up this commission the prez is forming. Good idea. But someone else should do it. I know just what would have been said if Clinton had did it. And now we don't get answers from this commission till March 2005. Four months after the election of course. Now I can tell you if that was Clinton the right would be near death threats with there remarks. But dont say anything about there boy George.
If anyone has followed the polls lately even those from fox news. You know why he changed his mind on this commisssion. He was dead against this till the polls told him another story. So folks you know it's all in the game so why act so dam far out about it. They play it well in DC. That would be right and left both. It's just you guys on the right seem to have a hard time undestanding that. you seem to think the republicans are some kind of saints. You must have for gotten Nixon. And Ollie North. Oh hell plame that on Clinton to. Hell no go back to Johnson. so to you thqt missed the 3/4 years of all kinds of chit to do with Clinton. Welcome to the chit of Bush. Only one differance. I will say good thing about Bush. If I think I should. the right seems to have ahard time sayong anything good about anyone other then Bush. Oh well as you grow older you get smarter.
ctownguy said:
I tend to agree with the statement above minus the last few words in general when it comes to life overall.
Well I guess its those lies the right had to say over and over for 5/6 years about Clinton Ctownguy. Because they fall back to Clinton all the time still and he has been out offfice now 3 years.
So I guess I agree.
So I guess I agree.
