Clemson/NCST in game...

LuvThemDogs

Registered User
Forum Member
Dec 2, 2005
1,310
51
48
I didn't make a bet on this game, but that was just awful. You have to review that TD and call. It's not a judgement call. He's either in or out. And now, instead of being up by one, they are down by 13. That's a damn shame....
 

LuvThemDogs

Registered User
Forum Member
Dec 2, 2005
1,310
51
48
Yeah I only saw the high angle at first then I saw the closer one,. pretty clear. I corrected myself

Right. They kept showing the front angle, and then gave the back, high angle over the top. Both replays were conclusive that he wasn't out of bounds. I don't get why that wasn't reviewed? Dumb asses...
 

bleedingpurple

Registered User
Forum Member
Mar 23, 2008
22,441
260
83
52
Where it is real F ing COLD
I didn't make a bet on this game, but that was just awful. You have to review that TD and call. It's not a judgement call. He's either in or out. And now, instead of being up by one, they are down by 13. That's a damn shame....

Yeah if ya have the replay it should be used. Flipping between games, I have no money on it either
 

LuvThemDogs

Registered User
Forum Member
Dec 2, 2005
1,310
51
48
how did state's coaching staff not challenge that

The announcers kept saying, they should review this, like it wasn't the coaches who challenge a replay. But maybe it comes from the officials to review. I don't know. Maybe this game, it's up to the officials to review a play and not give the coaches the ability to challenge? Other than that, it makes no sense...:shrug:
 

bjfinste

Registered User
Forum Member
Mar 14, 2001
5,462
18
0
AZ
Is it a reviewable play if they whistle the play over because guy out of bounds?
 

kksuited

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 1, 2005
222
0
0
If you're NC State, you have to call a TO and raise hell until they review that play. They just got to the line a ran a play.
 

LA Burns

Registered
Forum Member
Jun 11, 2003
3,909
32
0
New Orleans
funny when everyone at the game and everyone at home can see it clearly yet the refs have no idea - Clemson is the acc's ticket to fame and fortune this year - hmmmm

ineptitude or something else - I really don't know but it is extremely na?ve to think that screwy things have not occurred over the course of time


gl - LA Burns
 

TouchdownJesus

Registered User
Forum Member
Jun 13, 2004
6,148
83
48
North Carolina
What a crock of shit. If nothing else, let the play go knowing it can be reviewed...

This is what I hate about replay. Not everything can be reviewed so it makes it unfair. Just like in the NFL...they review every score...but its not like they review the plays where the guy is called down at the 1 but actually scored...

Damn that was bullshit.
 

LuvThemDogs

Registered User
Forum Member
Dec 2, 2005
1,310
51
48
What a crock of shit. If nothing else, let the play go knowing it can be reviewed...

This is what I hate about replay. Not everything can be reviewed so it makes it unfair. Just like in the NFL...they review every score...but its not like they review the plays where the guy is called down at the 1 but actually scored...

Damn that was bullshit.

Complete game changer. Clemson would have been down and facing the pressure of an upset. Now, instead, they go up 2 scores and can let it fly because the game is over.

You're from NC? Pulling for STate in this game?
 

LuvThemDogs

Registered User
Forum Member
Dec 2, 2005
1,310
51
48
nc st coaching staff should have called timeout to challenge - ineptitude on their part, or compliance

But it could be possible that they couldn't call a TO or challenge if the play was ruled dead, because he was ruled as stepping out....
 

LA Burns

Registered
Forum Member
Jun 11, 2003
3,909
32
0
New Orleans
possible but runner was clear of all defenders in all out sprint - play should have been able to be reviewed without doubt should have been overturned

I would call a timeout either way
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top