colts did everything they could

smurphy

cartographer
Forum Member
Jul 31, 2004
19,914
140
63
17
L.A.
didn't the Colts have a ton of injuries and one receiver left who was double and triple teamed the whole game but still went well over 100 yards? Did the O-linemen ever get a break the whole game? Did Peyton miss the tackles on the free 14 points the Colts gave the Chargers on runbacks?

I'm not opposed to believing there is funny stuff going on in sports when we're talking about the line, but I don't think it happened in this game.

Don't infuse logic into these remarkable fixed game threads.:nono:
 

Emersonboozer

Registered User
Forum Member
Oct 3, 2006
822
2
0
You are right. The evidence is in and they still refuse to believe what has already been proven. These squares probably think that the NBA ref Tim Donaghy scandal is an isoltaed incident. How naive would you have to be to think that an industry with millions of dollars at stake each week hasnt been tampered with? I know what I see and I get crucifies for saying it? Its like I just told them Superman isnt real.
 

MrChristo

The Zapper
Forum Member
Nov 11, 2001
4,414
5
0
Sexlexia...
Right...so let me get this straight...

It was a "fixed" under...by the Colts...because Payton threw 6 INT's...

...so, it doesn't matter then that SD scored 10 points off these TO's, and that 2 of the 5 ended up deep in Indi's half?

...or that Indi themselves scored a 2pt conversion early in the 4th...which, had it failed (wink, wink) would have effectively ended the contest.

Oh, oh...of course...that would have been too obvious!!...:nono:

And...AND!!...the defense wasn't in on the deal? :shrug: Bet they're pissed they didn't get a cut when they realise what went on!...By reading this thread of course...because this, and other (less worthy of course Jack ;)) gambling sites is where half the NFL players hang out in their spare time. :SIB

Was Rivers in on the deal?...Or doesn't his INT deep in Indi territory count, 'cause he's crap?...Maybe he was actually on the 'over', so the books could cover their arses either way...why else would he fumble the ball in his own end-zone!!! :shrug:
Surely the Indi D could have mocked up a bumbling attempt at recovery and spilt it OOB?? Sorry, I forgot they weren't involved.

As for the NBA "incident" a ref altering a game is 1000% a different story...
...you want to claim the ref that blew the "incidental whistle" was on SD? Yeah, well, can't argue...not sure he could possible be on the under given that it was blown almost instantly and he had absolutely no way of telling it would go about 90 yards the other way...

...besides, the now infamous Donaghy call is so ****ing blantantly obvious that even he must feel silly about it!!

No-one's crucifising you Eb...but the question must be asked...this is a sports gambling site...if you effectively believe there is no such legitimate thing, then what are you doing here? :shrug:

EDIT: I was on the Det/Denver under a couple of weeks back and with 21 defensive points, I reckon Shaun Rogers was on the take, given that he would not have run 66 yards in his 6 year career...not to mention the official who upheld the Det challange on Denver's only TD.
Those bastards...now it all becomes clear to me!!!

That's it!!...I'm off to re-fit my old tin-foil hat.
 
Last edited:
Bet on MyBookie
Top