*CONSENSUS PICK* Thursday May 30th
- Thread starter thisisbad
- Start date
Oakland-155
Hudson starting to get in a groove
It is weak to ban big faves. If you do you are saying youd never bet the Yankees, Unit or Schilling, MAriners, or against Tampa Bay. That is the essence of gambling, betting that the great teams will beat the horrible ones.
Hudson starting to get in a groove
It is weak to ban big faves. If you do you are saying youd never bet the Yankees, Unit or Schilling, MAriners, or against Tampa Bay. That is the essence of gambling, betting that the great teams will beat the horrible ones.
cleveland
Sabathia is 2-0 with a 3.79 ERA in three career outings against the Indians
He allowed one run and three hits over eight innings in a 5-1 win at Detroit on April 7.
4/7/2002 Det. 1 - Cle. 5 J.Weaver C.C.Sabathia
7/28/2001 Det. 4 - Cle. 6 V.Santos C.C.Sabathia
Sabathia is 2-0 with a 3.79 ERA in three career outings against the Indians
He allowed one run and three hits over eight innings in a 5-1 win at Detroit on April 7.
4/7/2002 Det. 1 - Cle. 5 J.Weaver C.C.Sabathia
7/28/2001 Det. 4 - Cle. 6 V.Santos C.C.Sabathia
POD
POD
My thoughts exactly TJBELL
AZ/SF over 9 even
Dats what I got it for, would have liked that 8- alot!!
POD
My thoughts exactly TJBELL
AZ/SF over 9 even
Dats what I got it for, would have liked that 8- alot!!
tough board today it seems. Nice call for those of you that took the over in the cubs game.
Taking the over in the san fran/arizona game tonight. Seattle looks good as well since erickson got rocked by the M's last time, but I believe the bats come out tonight for San Fran.
as far as the chalk goes, I really don't care. But I really don't see the point in posting a 300 favorite. Of course that is an easy pick or it wouldn't be 300. Just my opinion.:nono:
Taking the over in the san fran/arizona game tonight. Seattle looks good as well since erickson got rocked by the M's last time, but I believe the bats come out tonight for San Fran.
as far as the chalk goes, I really don't care. But I really don't see the point in posting a 300 favorite. Of course that is an easy pick or it wouldn't be 300. Just my opinion.:nono:
Not to be a bandwagon jumper, but I have to go with OAKLAND tonight as well.
As for the big chalk, I have no real opinion. In the real world, I don't bet on them unless I take the odds down using the run line. It seems like there was a similar debate a couple of weeks ago where a number of people said not to take underdogs for the consensus just to help your record, and now folks are saying don't take big favorites to help your record. I think taking the big chalk is a losing strategy in the long run, but one of the great things about this country is the right to throw your money away if you want to, so I wouldn't favor any restrictions.:nono:
As for the big chalk, I have no real opinion. In the real world, I don't bet on them unless I take the odds down using the run line. It seems like there was a similar debate a couple of weeks ago where a number of people said not to take underdogs for the consensus just to help your record, and now folks are saying don't take big favorites to help your record. I think taking the big chalk is a losing strategy in the long run, but one of the great things about this country is the right to throw your money away if you want to, so I wouldn't favor any restrictions.:nono:
going with cleve today, and also like the over in this game, but will not go against KC, I know they are the king of unders
