Democrats? ideal voter:

Skulnik

Truth Teller
Forum Member
Mar 30, 2007
22,273
1,440
113
Jefferson City, Missouri
Ann Coulter Letter
Democrats? ideal voter: Illegal alien, convicted felon

border-crossing-ann-coulter-voter-fraud-620x412.jpg


By: Ann Coulter
7/18/2012 04:57 PM




Before taking the oath of office, Barack Obama vowed to fundamentally transform the United States. He has certainly done so. For example, Obama has:
? destroyed the job market;
? sent billions of taxpayer dollars to Wall Street, companies overseas, his campaign contributors and public sector unions;
? forced the passage of a wildly unpopular national health care law on a purely partisan vote;
? come out for gay marriage;
? refused to enforce laws on illegal immigration;
? eliminated the work requirement for welfare.
How can a country that elected Ronald Reagan have Obama tied in the polls with Mitt Romney?
The answer is: It?s not the same country.
Similarly, when two successful, attractive multimillionaire women in California can?t beat a geriatric leftist like Jerry Brown or an old prune like Barbara Boxer, that?s not the same state that elected Ronald Reagan twice, either.
The same process that has already destroyed California is working its way through the entire country.
While conservatives have been formulating carefully constructed arguments, liberals have been playing a long-term game to change the demographics of America to get an electorate more to their liking.
They will do incalculable damage to the nation and to individual citizens, but Democrats will have an unbeatable majority. Just like California, the United States is on its way to becoming a Third World, one-party state.
Teddy Kennedy?s 1965 Immigration Act was expressly designed to change the ethnic composition of America to make it more like Nigeria, considered more susceptible to liberal demagogues.
Since 1965, instead of taking immigrants that replicate the country?s existing ethnic mix, we?ve been admitting mostly immigrants from the Third World. At the same time, people from the countries that sent immigrants to this country for its first several centuries have been barred.

Eighty-five percent of immigrants now come from ?developing countries.? (How are they ever going to develop if their people are all on the dole over here?)
The ?browning of America? is not a natural process. It?s been artificially imposed by Democrats who are confident of their abilities to turn Third World immigrants into government patrons.
It?s worked. According to the Center for Immigration Studies, 57 percent of all immigrant households in the U.S. get cash, Medicaid, housing or food benefits from the government ? compared with 39 percent of native households. The highest rates are for immigrants from the Dominican Republic (82 percent), Mexico and Guatemala (tied at 75 percent).
Isn?t the idea to get immigrants with special skills? If you can?t even get a job, by definition, you do not have a special skill. Other than voting Democrat.
There?s a strange asymmetry in how this matter can be discussed. Liberals and ethnic activists boast about how America would be better if it were more Latino, but no one else is allowed to say, ?We like the ethnic mix as it is.?
That would be racist. By now no one even tries to disagree.
Liberals? other plan to expand the Democratic rolls has been to destroy the family.
Every time someone gets a divorce, Democrats think: We got a new Democratic voter! Every time a child is born out of wedlock: We got a new Democratic voter! And if the woman has an abortion ? we got a new Democratic voter!
According to recent polls, Obama has a negative job approval rating of 45 to 49 percent. The reason the polls are tied between Obama and Romney is that single women support Obama by a 2-to-1 margin. The Democrats? siren song to single women is: Don?t worry, the government will be your husband.
Our prisons are overflowing with the results of the Democrats? experiment of subsidizing illegitimacy. Children raised by a single mothers commit 72 percent of juvenile murders, 60 percent of rapes, have 70 percent of teenaged births, commit 70 percent of suicides and are 70 percent of high school dropouts.
Controlling for socioeconomic status, race and place of residence, the strongest predictor of whether a person will end up in prison is being raised by a single parent. (The second strongest predictor is having a tattoo.)
A 1990 study by the Progressive Policy Institute showed that after controlling for single motherhood, the difference in black and white crime disappeared.
Human beings in God?s image are being born into ruined lives at rates that boggle the mind. Illegitimate children are never given a chance, their lives destroyed by this social pathology. And Democrats say: More Democratic voters!
Throw in felons voting, and the Democrats have an unbeatable majority.
 

THE KOD

Registered
Forum Member
Nov 16, 2001
42,564
315
83
Victory Lane
While Romney may personally prefer to drop out before releasing more returns, people who know him note that he doesn't always do what he wants. Torn between his longtime desire to be president and his equally strong belief that he should not be forced to release more returns, Romney may turn, as he has with so many big decisions, to strict numbers-based analysis. If he plummets in the polls and the risk of defeat presses itself on him, the sources say, his calculation could change.

A variety of possible explanations for Romney's refusal to release the returns have flowed into the information vacuum. The Obama campaign has floated the notion that maybe he paid no taxes at all in some years. Others have wondered if he was part of the Swiss tax evasion scandal of 2009. Underlying the resistance, sources close to him say, is Romney's belief that voters simply don't have a right to see what should be private financial information.

If the scrutiny that Romney's 2010 taxes have already undergone is any indication, his fears are well placed. The filing indicated a Swiss bank account -- unprecedented for a presidential candidate -- which added to the image of a wealthy man unfamiliar with ordinary people's limitations. Bain filings show that several of its companies set up shop in Bermuda and the Cayman Islands, places known as tax havens.

Romney told the National Review that the Cayman Islands company was set up to allow foreign corporations to invest in the United States without paying U.S. taxes. "[T]he so-called offshore account in the Cayman Islands, for instance, is an account established by a U.S. firm to allow foreign investors to invest in U.S. enterprises and not be subject to taxes outside of their own jurisdiction. So in many instances, the investments in something of that nature are brought back into the United States. The world of finance is not as simple as some would have you believe," he said.

For now, Romney continued, he's content to keep the returns private. "In the political environment that exists today, the opposition research of the Obama campaign is looking for anything they can use to distract from the failure of the president to reignite our economy. And I'm simply not enthusiastic about giving them hundreds or thousands of more pages ...........................................................



Willard may drop out


Would that make him a liar and a fraud ?
 

THE KOD

Registered
Forum Member
Nov 16, 2001
42,564
315
83
Victory Lane
Some tax experts are alarmed by Mitt Romney's apparent admission that Bain Capital set up offshore accounts in the Cayman Islands to help wealthy investors avoid paying U.S. taxes.

During an interview with the National Review's Robert Costa, Romney said that offshore sub-companies in the Cayman Islands help foreign investors avoid paying taxes on investments in the United States. Bain Capital currently has 138 such sub-companies headquartered in the Cayman Islands.

"The so-called offshore account in the Cayman Islands, for instance, is an account established by a U.S. firm to allow foreign investors to invest in U.S. enterprises and not be subject to taxes outside of their own jurisdiction," Romney said. "So in many instances, the investments in something of that nature are brought back into the United States. The world of finance is not as simple as some would have you believe. Sometimes a foreign entity is formed to allow foreign investors to invest in the United States, which may well be the case with the entities that Democrats are describing as foreign accounts."

By taxes "outside of their own jurisdiction," Romney is referring to taxes imposed by the U.S. government.

"He's basically admitting here that the Bain funds are set up in the Cayman Islands to help people avoid tax," said Rebecca Wilkins, senior counsel for federal tax policy at Citizens for Tax Justice, a nonprofit tax reform group. "If you want to cheat on your taxes, boy, they're making it really easy."

Since the Cayman Islands do not report information on their investors' accounts to other nations, however, such sub-companies don't merely help foreign investors avoid U.S. taxes, they help investors avoid paying taxes in other nations, as well. The ploy can even help American taxpayers invest in U.S. companies without accruing a tax bill with the IRS. By establishing personal offshore entities, Americans can pose as foreign investors and avoid paying U.S. taxes on investments in American firms.

"Even a U.S. investor pretending to be a foreign investor, by using a Bermuda or Cayman Islands shell entity, can avoid U.S. tax this way," Wilkins told HuffPost. "And we know that's going on. We know that U.S. investors are evading taxes by pretending to be foreigners."

Offshore entities have other, perfectly legal, tax benefits for wealthy Americans.

"There are rules in the internal revenue code on deductions, where you don't incur them, your Caymans entity does, and you can reduce your tax bill," said New York University School of Law professor Daniel Shaviro.

One IRS rule, for instance, prevents taxpayers from taking "miscellaneous" deductions, which can include a host of fees paid to financial advisers, at any amount below 2 percent of their total income. But the tax savings from these deductions can only be recognized when the total fees amount to at least 2 percent of a taxpayer's total income -- and even then, only the amount over 2 percent can be deducted. If 2 percent of a taxpayer's income is $10,000, for instance, at least $10,000 in advisory fees must be accrued in order to be written off, and even then, only the amount over $10,000 can be written off.

But by establishing a Cayman Islands corporation, an individual can charge all of his financial advisory fees to his offshore company, effectively deducting them entirely from his individual tax bill. The Cayman Islands company's money eventually shows up on the individual's tax return -- but only its total profit. Since the financial advisory fees are a cost that reduces the Cayman company's total profit, deductions that would be impermissible for an individual become legal with offshore complexity.

Shaviro agreed that Romney seemed to be implying that Bain had set up offshore accounts to help foreign investors avoid U.S. taxes. Shaviro also noted that more sophisticated financial engineering, including the use of complex derivatives securities, could be used by Cayman entities to further game the U.S. tax code, but noted there is no evidence that Romney has used those.
...................................................

:scared
 

THE KOD

Registered
Forum Member
Nov 16, 2001
42,564
315
83
Victory Lane
s-MITT-ROMNEY-large300.jpg


I thought I had it this time....
sniff,,,,,sniff,,,,, I didn't think they would ever ask me about my taxs.....I didn't........I just didn't
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top