Denver lost Decker & Moreno & Welker for 4 games

T

T

Registered
Forum Member
Sep 1, 2012
10,096
857
113
The entire world is on DENVER. Last game of the day and a lot of chalk chasers.
I would like to believe that the MANNING effect is in play but that's shit load of offense GONE.
I wish some INDY fans would give some insight on the status of the COLTS.
This looks fishy to me.
 
B

barmeezee

Registered
Forum Member
Nov 24, 2012
964
8
0
i definitely agree with you here.. its almost like Indy gained some talent and Denver clearly lost a bunch.. i am pretty sure Peyton wants to win this one at home since Indy smoked em last year on the road but thats not enough to get it done.. I think Indy scores as much as they want and its a matter if they can stop Denver they may win SU
 
Dr Feelgood

Dr Feelgood

StonedPimp
Forum Member
Feb 3, 2001
3,608
24
38
Las Vegas
What they lost in O, they gained in D.....look for a similar result to last year's opening night game...Luck or not
 
T

T

Registered
Forum Member
Sep 1, 2012
10,096
857
113
Just what I was looking for...

Just what I was looking for...

Last year was the first year we saw Peyton regress and start to show his age. One year older and you take his best weapons away. Welker suspension, Decker and Moreno left to other teams. The OLine needed to be fixed and it was glaring in the SB but was ignored as Elway decided to rebuild the entire defense with 9 new starters. Yes they are talented but I don't care if you have 11 All Pros playing their first meaningful game together it will take time to trust each other and learn the system. They are not stopping Luck, a healthy Wayne, Hilton or Nicks.

No Mathis but they'll get pressure against this OLine with bliztes, Arien is not dumb. The biggest key for me is Indy last year was the only team to stop the Broncos WR's playing up and hitting the crap out of them holding them to under 20 points until late in the game. There are so many question marks coming into game 1 for the Broncos that I can't pass up the points. I know Peyton in prime time but this isn't the same QB as years past and so much turnover from last year, lots of new faces laying big points means trouble.
 
M

Musca

Registered User
Forum Member
Mar 3, 2005
1,998
14
38
Fort Worth, TX
Angle

Angle

Betting against the super bowl loser in game 1 of the new season is 12-2 ATS since 00.

Musca
 
V

volman

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 16, 2010
604
8
18
TFresh said:
Last year was the first year we saw Peyton regress and start to show his age. One year older and you take his best weapons away. Welker suspension, Decker and Moreno left to other teams. The OLine needed to be fixed and it was glaring in the SB but was ignored as Elway decided to rebuild the entire defense with 9 new starters. Yes they are talented but I don't care if you have 11 All Pros playing their first meaningful game together it will take time to trust each other and learn the system. They are not stopping Luck, a healthy Wayne, Hilton or Nicks.

No Mathis but they'll get pressure against this OLine with bliztes, Arien is not dumb. The biggest key for me is Indy last year was the only team to stop the Broncos WR's playing up and hitting the crap out of them holding them to under 20 points until late in the game. There are so many question marks coming into game 1 for the Broncos that I can't pass up the points. I know Peyton in prime time but this isn't the same QB as years past and so much turnover from last year, lots of new faces laying big points means trouble.
Click to expand...

55 TD'S regress hardly some arm strength may be gone but he didn't regress and Denver ' s pass rush got a hell of a lot better with Ware be hard to double him and Miller!!!
 
T

T

Registered
Forum Member
Sep 1, 2012
10,096
857
113
1Q ML is -225 but -.5 is only -130 ?
That is wacked it should be -.5 -150
 
IX_Bender

IX_Bender

Registered User
Forum Member
Oct 26, 1999
7,661
116
63
350 yards from the Atlantic(moved)
www.madjacksports.com
TFresh said:
Last year was the first year we saw Peyton regress and start to show his age.
Click to expand...


<script type="text/javascript" src="http://widgets.sports-reference.com/wg.fcgi?css=1&site=pfr&url=%2Fplayers%2FM%2FMannPe00.htm&div=div_passing"></script>


68% completions 5400 yds 55 tds. lowest number of INTs in the last 7 years. regression? more like statements of confounding stupidity. Denver may not cover this game, but I cannot abide such nonsense.

you are going back on ignore.
 
T

T

Registered
Forum Member
Sep 1, 2012
10,096
857
113
IX_Bender said:
<script type="text/javascript" src="http://widgets.sports-reference.com/wg.fcgi?css=1&site=pfr&url=%2Fplayers%2FM%2FMannPe00.htm&div=div_passing"></script>


68% completions 5400 yds 55 tds. lowest number of INTs in the last 7 years. regression? more like statements of confounding stupidity. Denver may not cover this game, but I cannot abide such nonsense.

you are going back on ignore.
Click to expand...

I copied that from another forum. I dont give a fuck if you put me on ignore.
 
Hashish

Hashish

Smoked
Forum Member
Sep 5, 2006
8,085
107
0
Surf City
IMO you are dumb betting on this game at all. Denver will win, but who knows if they will roll them or not. There were lots of better spots earlier today. Pass on this one. Good luck.
 
M

Musca

Registered User
Forum Member
Mar 3, 2005
1,998
14
38
Fort Worth, TX
Dog and Over

Dog and Over

I like the Dog and over... give me 37-31 final with Denver winning SU but not ATS.

FWIW Colts are 0-6 ATS their lat 6 openers.
Loser of superbowl is 12-2 ATS last 14 but the has covered the last 2.

Manning has weapons and will score. Denver defense is going to be pretty good but are they in game one?


NBL

Small plays
 
Old School

Old School

OVR
Forum Member
Mar 19, 2006
38,443
461
83
74
the numbers..

05/13/2014 10:29 AM EDT
DENVER BRONCOS -7 +06
55o05
off
off
05/17/2014 1:50 PM EDT
DENVER BRONCOS -6.5
55
05/19/2014 1:44 PM EDT
DENVER BRONCOS -6.5 -13
05/19/2014 2:05 PM EDT
DENVER BRONCOS -6.5 -15
07/01/2014 4:42 PM EDT
DENVER BRONCOS -6.5 -20
07/01/2014 4:45 PM EDT
DENVER BRONCOS -6.5 -15
07/25/2014 1:59 PM EDT
DENVER BRONCOS -7 -05
08/24/2014 6:27 PM EDT
56u12
08/24/2014 10:30 PM EDT
56u14
08/25/2014 5:06 AM EDT
56u17
08/25/2014 9:03 AM EDT
55.5
08/26/2014 5:24 PM EDT
55.5u16
08/26/2014 6:00 PM EDT
55.5u17
08/28/2014 12:58 PM EDT
DENVER BRONCOS -6.5
55
08/29/2014 10:24 PM EDT
+273
-310
08/30/2014 1:54 AM EDT
DENVER BRONCOS -7 -05
08/31/2014 2:01 PM EDT
DENVER BRONCOS -7 -16
09/01/2014 9:25 AM EDT
DENVER BRONCOS -7.5
09/01/2014 11:03 AM EDT
+281
-320
09/01/2014 12:43 PM EDT
55.5
09/01/2014 1:36 PM EDT
+289
-330
09/01/2014 1:58 PM EDT
+315
-362
09/01/2014 5:48 PM EDT
+322
-370
09/01/2014 9:43 PM EDT
+334
-386
09/02/2014 12:48 AM EDT
+322
-370
09/02/2014 12:51 AM EDT
+314
-360
09/02/2014 12:55 AM EDT
+322
-370
09/02/2014 8:55 PM EDT
+301
-345
09/02/2014 10:34 PM EDT
+297
-340
09/03/2014 9:16 AM EDT
+305
-375
09/03/2014 4:04 PM EDT
+290
-350
09/06/2014 9:28 PM EDT
55
09/07/2014 9:28 AM EDT
+286
-351
09/07/2014 9:50 AM EDT
+295
-360
09/07/2014 10:08 AM EDT
55u14
09/07/2014 10:20 AM EDT
55
09/07/2014 10:32 AM EDT
54.5
09/07/2014 11:08 AM EDT
+298
-364
09/07/2014 2:28 PM EDT
DENVER BRONCOS -8
54
+305
-375
09/07/2014 4:14 PM EDT
53.5
09/07/2014 4:29 PM EDT
+310
-380
09/07/2014 4:38 PM EDT
53
09/07/2014 4:47 PM EDT
+315
-390
09/07/2014 4:56 PM EDT
DENVER BRONCOS -9
+345
-425
09/07/2014 4:59 PM EDT
DENVER BRONCOS -9.5
09/07/2014 5:02 PM EDT
DENVER BRONCOS -9.5 -02
+355
-450
09/07/2014 5:05 PM EDT
DENVER BRONCOS -9
09/07/2014 5:32 PM EDT
+345
-425
09/07/2014 5:35 PM EDT
DENVER BRONCOS -8.5
53.5
+335
-415
09/07/2014 7:26 PM EDT
DENVER BRONCOS -9
09/07/2014 7:32 PM EDT
54
09/07/2014 7:38 PM EDT
53.5
09/07/2014 7:44 PM EDT
DENVER BRONCOS -8.5
53.5o11
09/07/2014 7:50 PM EDT
DENVER BRONCOS -8
53.5
+305
-375
09/07/2014 7:59 PM EDT
DENVER BRONCOS -7.5
09/07/2014 8:02 PM EDT
DENVER BRONCOS -7.5 -12
09/07/2014 8:05 PM EDT
DENVER BRONCOS -8 -11
09/07/2014 8:08 PM EDT
DENVER BRONCOS -8

<tbody>
</tbody>
 
B

barmeezee

Registered
Forum Member
Nov 24, 2012
964
8
0
Hashish said:
IMO you are dumb betting on this game at all. Denver will win, but who knows if they will roll them or not. There were lots of better spots earlier today. Pass on this one. Good luck.
Click to expand...

probably the best advice but i am guessing like most recreational players alot of dudes out there just want the action .. but again you are spot on
 
T

T

Registered
Forum Member
Sep 1, 2012
10,096
857
113
Hashish said:
IMO you are dumb betting on this game at all. Denver will win, but who knows if they will roll them or not. There were lots of better spots earlier today. Pass on this one. Good luck.
Click to expand...

Ok for one I never POSTED A BET. THAT WAS SF 1H that won in the first 10 mins.
Good luck.
 
LonghornMM

LonghornMM

Registered User
Forum Member
Oct 30, 2003
4,520
197
63
Deer Park, TX
Hashish said:
IMO you are dumb betting on this game at all. Denver will win, but who knows if they will roll them or not. There were lots of better spots earlier today. Pass on this one. Good luck.
Click to expand...

I teased Denver to -1 1/2 and over 47 and also have them in an open 3-team teaser at +2 1/2
 
P

poolplayer8888

Registered
Forum Member
Jan 15, 2006
1,207
20
0
TFresh said:
Last year was the first year we saw Peyton regress and start to show his age. One year older and you take his best weapons away. Welker suspension, Decker and Moreno left to other teams. The OLine needed to be fixed and it was glaring in the SB but was ignored as Elway decided to rebuild the entire defense with 9 new starters. Yes they are talented but I don't care if you have 11 All Pros playing their first meaningful game together it will take time to trust each other and learn the system. They are not stopping Luck, a healthy Wayne, Hilton or Nicks.

No Mathis but they'll get pressure against this OLine with bliztes, Arien is not dumb. The biggest key for me is Indy last year was the only team to stop the Broncos WR's playing up and hitting the crap out of them holding them to under 20 points until late in the game. There are so many question marks coming into game 1 for the Broncos that I can't pass up the points. I know Peyton in prime time but this isn't the same QB as years past and so much turnover from last year, lots of new faces laying big points means trouble.
Click to expand...

Peyton regressed last year?? Are you on drugs?
 
gardenweasel

gardenweasel

el guapo
Forum Member
Jan 10, 2002
40,575
226
63
"the bunker"
I was absolutely shocked to see that aq Shipley was indy`s starting center tonight...I can tell you that he played quite a bit for the ravens last year and was a huge liability(we averaged 2.9 ypc and the pass protection was nonexistent)...matter of fact i`m pretty sure he was not being brought back if he cleared waivers....

not saying it will sway the balance but not a good thing for colt backers,i can guar-an-tee...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Bet on MyBookie
Top