gjn23 said:
how manay points does a team need to win by for you to be impressed or to give credit? Especially on the road...especially in the playoffs? From my perspective Miami dominated game three except for a 7-8 min stretch at the end of q3-start of q4.....so they led by only 2 or so at half and won by only 10 or so at the end of the game.....very rare are complete blowouts in the playoffs..
I agree with you. But here is the deal with me. Miami playing well, Pistons not, Wade/Shaq playing great, Miami barely beating Pistons. That does not impress me about Miami. Game 2 and game 3 Detroit despite playing poorly for most of game, could easily have won either game. That is why I am not impressed with Miami. I am not implying Miami is lucky but just fortunate that they are playing really well and Detroit is not. I wish this series was like Spurs/Suns where both teams are playing good basketball. Then lets see where chips fall. Now some stuff you can give credit to Miami for causing Detroit to not play well but
there are couple areas where Detroit is playing poorly that has NOTHING to do with Miami. Those couple areas are the difference in Detroit being up 3-0 or min. 2-1 in this series. THAT IS WHY I AM NOT IMPRESSED WITH MIAMI! Now if Detroit was playing well and Miami playing well and Miami barely beating Detroit, I would be impressed with Heat.
As for wade and shaq overacheving....im guessing that you must also think michael jordan was a very very good player but over-acheived in the playoffs?????? the truly GREAT players always step up and score more in the playoffs...that's what the playoffs are all about....to say that this diminished miami's accomplishments is a joke....10-1 in the playoffs is very impressive...so is 5-0 on the road....
Wade and Shaq are playing MUCH better than there average AND what most people (including me) expected. Thats great for Miami. Role players playing great in games 2 and 3 as well. Thats great. BUT WHY DOES MIAMI STRUGGLE TO BEAT DETROIT? ESPECIALLY WHEN DETROIT IS PLAYING BELOW AVERAGE IN CERTAIN AREAS!
I agree great players step up. Miami has players stepping up and Detroit has the opposite going on. But you would figure Miami would win more convincingly or at least not give Detroit ANY chance to win the ball game. Detroit easily could have won games 2 & 3. That is my argument. That is what earns MY respect and what would impress me. Miami is not winning convincingly despite great play by Miami and poor play by Detroit.
as for det playing below average....i'd say that their offense has no such thing as average...it is usually ugly...their defense isidefinitely not what it was perceived to be...that could be because miami is a superior offensive team with two unstoppable players AND the change in rules FORCING det to play a bit more honest defense....these two things have NOTHING to do with det playing below average.....this is their average defensive performance.....you stated earlier that SA role players would have a field day with the phx defense (they really haven't outside of horry and berry and just in game 1-3) but it's an anomoly that mia role players are having a great series vs det....WHY?
Good points and valid points. I said you have to give some credit to Miami. But "my" major point and example is free throws. Miami would be down 2-1 or 3-0 if Detroit hit just there averages on free throws. Free throws have nothing to do with opposing team. Should I be impressed with Miami because they are playing very good, Detroit playing poorly, yet there only winning because Detroit can't make free throws and can't play good basketball (partly due to Miami and partly due to themselves)? Miami should be winning more convincingly. Please lets not forget Alonzo made 4-4 free throws and Shaq made 6 or 7 straight down stretch. Lets not forget that. Not only did Detroit shoot BELOW average, Miami shot ABOVE average. We def. will not EVER see Shaq make 6 or 7 straight again down stretch. I like to base my opinion on averages. Detroit is not playing like Detroit and it is not all based on Miami causing that! All I am saying is I like to see Miami beat Detroit when Detroit is playing good. Then I will be impressed!
I think it's purely you seeing things from the perspective of your wager, nothing else.
Maybe a little bit but what I am saying has at the very least "some" merit. It is not out of the question that I could be a little biased.
In the end I'm willing to admit that sa-phx are closely matched and sa is probably a better team in the end because they match-up better with phx....and that mia-det is a closely matched series with mia having an advantage with two superstars....you maximize sa wins and mimimize mia wins....WHY?
Simply put.......
Spurs playing relatively good basketball
Suns playing relatively good basketball
Miami playing relatively good basketball
Detroit playing relatively average/below average basketball.
Spurs/Suns you are seeing 2 teams playing well and obviously Spurs are the better team. But all games are close because both teams are playing well.
Detroit/Heat you have Heat playing well, Pistons playing below average, and games are very close.
Get it?
I also think Suns would beat Heat and Detroit. I have not been very impressed with Heat and Pistons. But I am somewhat impressed with how Detroit can hang with Heat despite playing poorly and Heat playing so well. That kind of shocks me as I would expect Heat to win convincingly (not necessarily blowout).
Why am I impressed with Spurs? Spurs beat Nuggets, Sonics, and hopefully Suns. All 3 playoff opponents were playing very good basketball and all 3 are dangerous.
Heat beat Nets, Wizards, and "maybe" Pistons. Pistons are by far the best team Heat faced and they are not playing well. I be VERY impressed if Heat beat Detroit with Detroit playing well. Free throws and lack of intensity are 2 biggest factors in seeing Detroit not playing well. Execution has been poorly too. Detroit has f***ed up on how many 2-1 3-1 fast breaks? Please don't give Miami too much credit for stopping that. Missing shots etc. you have to give credit to Miami regardless if it is Miami causing it.
BTW, Refs have been pretty slanted towards Miami. Whether you think it is a large slant or not, it def. is slanted towards Miami.
pt1gard
The basis of the argument is that I am not really impressed with Miami based on games 1, 2 and 3.
ps and as far as FTs, Spurs might still be playing sonics had TD not made 99% or be down 3-1 or at best tied 2-2 in PHX series ... guys with no nuts to step up and bang some FTs deserve their fate... And that's not even calculating JJ1 factor into equation--you are very fortunate to be up 3-1, any comments straying from that fact are rose-colored goggles.
I don't think Spurs are fortunate to be up 3-1. I do think Suns "could" have won at least 1 of the first 2 home games but they didn't. A lot of fortunate things happened for Suns to be in games with Spurs as well. Goes both ways. Both teams playing well and is good series. Just 1 team is better.