dont be a sucker!!!

jmizeus

Registered User
Forum Member
Dec 15, 2000
7,264
2
0
western,ny
one thing u guys might want to consider is, raiders got there asses handed to them on mnf vs broncos a few weeks back. normally when that happens the 2nd time on mnf they come to play:shrug:
i just believe this is definitely 1 game that u wont need the points. either a blow-out by kc, or raiders win s/u ??

right now i have to believe raiders are the wtg? especially after there performance on mnf vs broncos. plus kc back to back roadies? might have to play the total on this one
 

chuckdman

Registered User
Forum Member
Sep 5, 2003
1,314
2
0
50
TO
J Gates

J Gates

J Gates said:
the raiders do suck but somehow they will find a way to cover... just watch

yo chuck u got a deal!

OK.. so we have a deal. If Oakland wins, I will send you a Raiders baseball cap. If KC wins, you send me a KC hat. No spread.. straight win!.. Sounds good!? Let me know before kickoff. You can get my email from Jack.


GOOO KC!!!
 

steelersal

Registered User
Forum Member
Oct 9, 2003
24
0
0
59
florida
31-13 KC victory, don't see the Raiders getting it done tonight. Way to much speed on both sides of the ball and special teams,for an old,slow banged up Raider team to handle. :D

Oh I also like the under tonght also.;)

Good luck with your picks everyone.:cool:
 

BigSix

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 24, 2002
215
0
16
I'm a sucker, I'm a square, I'm the public.

I'm cashing a big FAT ticket!!

:nutkick
 

gman2

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 12, 2002
9,827
16
0
big six:

nothing positive can come out of you going in gates thread to rub in the loss. cheifs got it done. game was inches from the raiders likely cashing. no sense in giving gates sh1t
 

chuckdman

Registered User
Forum Member
Sep 5, 2003
1,314
2
0
50
TO
J Gates

J Gates

J Gates said:
chuck when should i ecpect that hat.... i no its gonna be mine

hahaha!! Thanks Gates, get my email from Jack and I will send you my address. I would like the AWAY KC hat please!! Don't be a sucker and listen to sucker posts like this !! :D It was close though but to all KC backers.. Great pick, and send some of the green to MR. Buchannen for fumbling the punt return!!

I LOVE YOU KC!! You guys are just moooooney!! Maybe I should send my NEW hat to Mr. Buchannen... :)Nah, just need 4-5 more hats for my football collection! Thanks Gates, will enjoy to see the hat! We'll do this again on your next "DONT BE A SUCKER" post!

Good luck in the future weeks!! :D
 

theGibber1

Registered User
Forum Member
Aug 27, 2001
8,615
64
0
Dallas TX
somtimes we lose when were on the right side.


the right side???

with exception of the 4th Oak was dominated the entire way.. if it werent for a few missed field goals and bad calls KC wins by 17.. this game wasnt close despite the end score
 

gman2

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 12, 2002
9,827
16
0
gibber:

game probably should have ended 10-3. how is that not close? oakland missed scoring opportunites just like kansas city did.

in all reality- buchanon normally doesnt fumble that punt. and because of the ensuing 10-yd scoring drive, cheifs drop back into prevent and let up a cheap TD of their own.

final could have easily been 10-3.

chiefs did just enough to cover.
neither team played particularly well. hardly domination

(i dont, however, agree that oakland was the right side, even though i had em. but by that same token, no way did kansas city dominate anyone either)
 
Last edited:

J Gates

Registered User
Forum Member
Sep 18, 2003
84
0
0
New York
u guys kae it sound like oakland had now chance...u guys all thought it was going to be a blow out and i had the close game right and i almost had the whole gmae right if i didnt come up a yard short....

im glad i was able to stir up so much attention though in this post!
 

chuckdman

Registered User
Forum Member
Sep 5, 2003
1,314
2
0
50
TO
J Gates said:
u guys kae it sound like oakland had now chance...u guys all thought it was going to be a blow out and i had the close game right and i almost had the whole gmae right if i didnt come up a yard short....

im glad i was able to stir up so much attention though in this post!

Gates!! Where's my hat :)?? It was close at the end and was surprised Oakland was able to stop the running game a bit. Holmes still netted over 100yds rushing but yah. I almost sh*t my pants at the end.. Thank God KC. Oakland will be better when they come back from their Bye week if Gannon is back. Porter looked good his first game back!..> he was the difference!
 

ctownguy

Life is Good
Forum Member
Jul 27, 2000
3,065
16
0
SoCal
Hey guys,

The bettors that were on KC were on the right side and the ones on Oakland were on the wrong side.

It's all about cashing the ticket, not where the sharp money is or sucker bets etc.

KC was the best team on paper and they covered that's it.

woulda coulda shoulda means nothing.

If Oak won then that would have been the right side, sometimes bettors try to read too much in the line and trends IMHO mean absolutely nothing on what's going to happen in a particular situation.

Just my opinion.
 

edludes

Registered User
Forum Member
Oct 25, 2001
3,592
38
0
alaska
J Gates-The sucker is the one who LOSES the bet.The losers tonight were wanna be sharpies who bet on a team with a six game ATS losing streak and a variety of other serious problems against a team that had done about evrything right so far this year.Just admit you were wrong,that the KC bettors had the game correctly handicapped,and that you and the other Raider backers were simply WRONG this time.A miss is as good as a mile in this game.Glad to see you admit you were only making an attention grab,(that was obvious to most of us,)now say the rest of it"I was wrong and myself a sucker and the KC bettors outsmarted me."
 

J Gates

Registered User
Forum Member
Sep 18, 2003
84
0
0
New York
betting is all luck...it has nothing to do with being out smarted... anything can happen in the NFL and this game looked to be a "trap" game... if u bet on the obvious side of those games more times then not u will lose and thats y sports books exist.
 

Valuist

Registered User
Forum Member
Aug 21, 2001
2,314
0
0
62
Mt. Prospect, IL
I don't think anyone can say Oakland was dominated. 25-16 first down edge, 357-311 yardage edge. KC won because the turnover edge. You can't count on getting the turnover edge and return TDs every week. This team is ripe for a fall.
 

chuckdman

Registered User
Forum Member
Sep 5, 2003
1,314
2
0
50
TO
GATES!!!

GATES!!!

J Gates said:
ctown....u make no sense

chuck who r u looken at for next week????

Yo Gates! Still didnt get an email from you! Still waiting for my KC hat! I hope your not going to back up on your word!

Right now, early leans are Minny and Tennese . Both teams have been rolling and dont think it will be any different. Still haven't done any homework cause work has been too crazy.
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top