poor Jimmy...it would have killed RollTide to get a ND QB:mj07:
I've got plenty of Vikings fans who are going to be just as upset. The guy's a stud and Weis f'd him again. . . .
. . . . and that's a receiver that comes along every 2 decades
poor Jimmy...it would have killed RollTide to get a ND QB:mj07:
his character was not so bad that itd be the deciding factor on not taking him if hes the best player.
he was in a pass happy offense that scored a million points due to the system.
dez is good player but calling him a once in a decade player is hilarious, hes not THAT good. hes like a javon walker.
I've got plenty of Vikings fans who are going to be just as upset. The guy's a stud and Weis f'd him again. . . .
. . . . and that's a receiver that comes along every 2 decades
I've got plenty of Vikings fans who are going to be just as upset. The guy's a stud and Weis f'd him again. . . .
. . . . and that's a receiver that comes along every 2 decades
check out zac robinson`s stats WITH bryant and WITHOUT.......
speaks volumes...the guy`s a beast...
man you are so off base with you analysis of Dez Bryant...you say hes tall, hes 6'2....hardly a giant WR...you say hes fast, he ran like what, 4.57?
his college stats mean absolutely nothing to me. he had big numbers in an offense that scores a lot of points. he had 200+ yards vrs Houston and Baylor and had 4 TD vrs Iowa State. not impressed.
there is no way hes a "once in 2 decade" player
I
I trust Ozzie over wease on player evaluation any day of the week.
:nono:![]()
Jerry Jones is going to go celebrate by getting another facelift.
his character was not so bad that itd be the deciding factor on not taking him if hes the best player.
he was in a pass happy offense that scored a million points due to the system.
dez is good player but calling him a once in a decade player is hilarious, hes not THAT good. hes like a javon walker.
:142smilie
Another reason why you have to trust ozzie.
.
i know his college stats mean nothing to you...that`s why you`re down with drafting an unprioven kid from a rushing offense...
you`re makin` stuff up....6`2" is a tall receiver...i didn`t say he was "fast"...i said he could get deep...
you obviously didn`t watch the guy in 2008.....
your team took a receiver on "potential"...bryant is a proven commodity in a passing offense...
with and without bryant...2008/2009
CMP ATT YDS CMP% YPA LNG TD INT SACK RAT
204 314 3064 65.0 9.76 95 25 10 15 166.84
180 301 2084 59.8 6.92 51 15 12 10 126.43
biiig difference....the guy`s a beast...a natural talent..
these stats mean nothing. he was on a team that played 0 defense and had the ball on offense constantly. they had to put up 30 points a game to even have a chance at winning.
of course hes a good player, im not saying hes not, but saying hes a once in a decade player is absolutely insane
these stats mean nothing. he was on a team that played 0 defense and had the ball on offense constantly. they had to put up 30 points a game to even have a chance at winning.
of course hes a good player, im not saying hes not, but saying hes a once in a decade player is absolutely insane
his college stats mean absolutely nothing to me. he had big numbers in an offense that scores a lot of points. he had 200+ yards vrs Houston and Baylor and had 4 TD vrs Iowa State. not impressed.
there is no way hes a "once in 2 decade" player
again what does this mean? Ga Tech was number 3 in the nation in time of possesion again how is that relevant?:shrug: :sadwave:
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.