draft in game

gardenweasel

el guapo
Forum Member
Jan 10, 2002
40,575
226
63
"the bunker"
his character was not so bad that itd be the deciding factor on not taking him if hes the best player.

he was in a pass happy offense that scored a million points due to the system.

dez is good player but calling him a once in a decade player is hilarious, hes not THAT good. hes like a javon walker.

check out zac robinson`s stats WITH bryant and WITHOUT.......

speaks volumes...the guy`s a beast...
 

dunclock

Registered User
Forum Member
Dec 22, 2001
11,899
125
63
64
Nashville, TN
I've got plenty of Vikings fans who are going to be just as upset. The guy's a stud and Weis f'd him again. . . .

. . . . and that's a receiver that comes along every 2 decades

was hoping we took Bryant but we need DE since we lost Albert last year and VandenBosch this year:scared
 

airportis

Registered User
Forum Member
Sep 22, 2006
6,522
178
63
38
NJ
check out zac robinson`s stats WITH bryant and WITHOUT.......

speaks volumes...the guy`s a beast...


man you are so off base with you analysis of Dez Bryant...you say hes tall, hes 6'2....hardly a giant WR...you say hes fast, he ran like what, 4.57?

his college stats mean absolutely nothing to me. he had big numbers in an offense that scores a lot of points. he had 200+ yards vrs Houston and Baylor and had 4 TD vrs Iowa State. not impressed.

there is no way hes a "once in 2 decade" player
 

shawn555

Registered
Forum Member
Apr 11, 2000
7,189
130
63
berlin md
I am happy with ravens draft, I would have liked Bryant but geting three picks for the Tebow slot is even better.

I trust Ozzie over wease on player evaluation any day of the week.
 

gardenweasel

el guapo
Forum Member
Jan 10, 2002
40,575
226
63
"the bunker"
man you are so off base with you analysis of Dez Bryant...you say hes tall, hes 6'2....hardly a giant WR...you say hes fast, he ran like what, 4.57?

his college stats mean absolutely nothing to me. he had big numbers in an offense that scores a lot of points. he had 200+ yards vrs Houston and Baylor and had 4 TD vrs Iowa State. not impressed.

there is no way hes a "once in 2 decade" player


i know his college stats mean nothing to you...that`s why you`re down with drafting an unprioven kid from a rushing offense...

you`re makin` stuff up....6`2" is a tall receiver...i didn`t say he was "fast"...i said he could get deep...

you obviously didn`t watch the guy in 2008.....

your team took a receiver on "potential"...bryant is a proven commodity in a passing offense...

with and without bryant...2008/2009
CMP ATT YDS CMP% YPA LNG TD INT SACK RAT
204 314 3064 65.0 9.76 95 25 10 15 166.84
180 301 2084 59.8 6.92 51 15 12 10 126.43


biiig difference....the guy`s a beast...a natural talent..
 

shawn555

Registered
Forum Member
Apr 11, 2000
7,189
130
63
berlin md

:142smilie

Another reason why you have to trust ozzie.

The Vikings wanted Dez Bryant and the Ravens told the Broncos that the Vikings were after Tebow. The Broncos returned with a huge package because they thought the Vikings were in on Tebow once NE traded to Dallas for Bryant.
 

Dice34

Off parole
Forum Member
Dec 18, 2004
4,731
27
0
D.O.C.
his character was not so bad that itd be the deciding factor on not taking him if hes the best player.

he was in a pass happy offense that scored a million points due to the system.

dez is good player but calling him a once in a decade player is hilarious, hes not THAT good. hes like a javon walker.

you really do have no clue what you are talking about do you??

ok state 2008: 326 pass att, 582 rush att
ok state 2009: 336 pass att, 555 rush att

to say thomas is easily better than bryant is inaccurate and a dumb statement.

Dez Bryant was the only option at wr for the cowboys (thats ok state:) ) as he didnt have a #2 that could keep teams from rolling the safety over the top to double him...

teams knew the ball was going to him and they still couldnt stop him....but he seems to be a diva and a retard....but not 2 fiddle to Thomas in talent as easily as you imply
 

airportis

Registered User
Forum Member
Sep 22, 2006
6,522
178
63
38
NJ
i know his college stats mean nothing to you...that`s why you`re down with drafting an unprioven kid from a rushing offense...

you`re makin` stuff up....6`2" is a tall receiver...i didn`t say he was "fast"...i said he could get deep...

you obviously didn`t watch the guy in 2008.....

your team took a receiver on "potential"...bryant is a proven commodity in a passing offense...

with and without bryant...2008/2009
CMP ATT YDS CMP% YPA LNG TD INT SACK RAT
204 314 3064 65.0 9.76 95 25 10 15 166.84
180 301 2084 59.8 6.92 51 15 12 10 126.43


biiig difference....the guy`s a beast...a natural talent..



these stats mean nothing. he was on a team that played 0 defense and had the ball on offense constantly. they had to put up 30 points a game to even have a chance at winning.

of course hes a good player, im not saying hes not, but saying hes a once in a decade player is absolutely insane
 

hedgehog

Registered
Forum Member
Oct 30, 2003
32,851
658
113
50
TX
sorry, I went away, had kids to deal with...

I can't believe Tebow goes before Colt or Claussen, wtf is Denver thinking?
 

gardenweasel

el guapo
Forum Member
Jan 10, 2002
40,575
226
63
"the bunker"
these stats mean nothing. he was on a team that played 0 defense and had the ball on offense constantly. they had to put up 30 points a game to even have a chance at winning.

of course hes a good player, im not saying hes not, but saying hes a once in a decade player is absolutely insane

time will tell....we`ll talk again this winter....:sadwave:
 
Last edited:

Dice34

Off parole
Forum Member
Dec 18, 2004
4,731
27
0
D.O.C.
these stats mean nothing. he was on a team that played 0 defense and had the ball on offense constantly. they had to put up 30 points a game to even have a chance at winning.

of course hes a good player, im not saying hes not, but saying hes a once in a decade player is absolutely insane

again what does this mean? Ga Tech was number 3 in the nation in time of possesion again how is that relevant?:shrug: :sadwave:
 

airportis

Registered User
Forum Member
Sep 22, 2006
6,522
178
63
38
NJ
Crabtree had ridiculous #s too. Was he a once per decade player? :142smilie
 

kegray1

Benneteau fan
Forum Member
Nov 4, 2004
9,663
9
0
53
Houston
his college stats mean absolutely nothing to me. he had big numbers in an offense that scores a lot of points. he had 200+ yards vrs Houston and Baylor and had 4 TD vrs Iowa State. not impressed.

there is no way hes a "once in 2 decade" player

People said the same about Steph Curry playing crap competition at Davidson. I think GS is happy with him after this season.
Bryant is a serious weapon. He fell because of suspect background just like how Moss fell in the draft.
 

airportis

Registered User
Forum Member
Sep 22, 2006
6,522
178
63
38
NJ
again what does this mean? Ga Tech was number 3 in the nation in time of possesion again how is that relevant?:shrug: :sadwave:

Yea GA Tech ran a triple option running the ball almost every play, of course theyre going to have a high possession time, thats usually the case when you run the ball 95% of the time.

OK St had the ball a lot because they blew ass on defense and let up a million points. Every game was a shootout.
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top