Easter

[203Hoosier]

My advice is to follow the streak system above ALL else.
It's time tested and proven. Takes the handicapping out of everything.
Just watch.
I will only post the streak system, if need be, for further proof, each day.
Sit back and watch the streaks.

 

[Truckin']

in your 3rd post in saturdays thread, where you wrote, "adding to get the mojo going"....

you posted 6 plays that all lost. then

you erased them and put in twins and white sox. after they had won.


so you went 0-10 in real life.

in hoosiers imaginary world you went 2-4

I will chime in here
I saw the 6 plays myself and he wrote something like I am no longer just playing 2 dogs and I said to myself wow that lasted a long time.
I am not saying he didn't have a great basketball season or was in the wrong with anything with hoops but I did see the plays

 

[Bombs]

Someone with an active betlabs account could get the numbers on this stream system very quickly over a huge length of time.

It would be highly atypical for something like that to work. Would be too easy for too many people to spot and corrected in the lines within a very short time frame.

 

[Ramjet7]

Are we not all adults? Fade or follow or let it go. Cmone!

 

[203Hoosier]

End of Sunday totals

Streaks
3-2
+$1,860

Underdogs
4-7
-$7,020

 

[203Hoosier]

Are we not all adults? Fade or follow or let it go. Cmone!

Exactly!:0074:0074

 

[203Hoosier]

Someone with an active betlabs account could get the numbers on this stream system very quickly over a huge length of time.

It would be highly atypical for something like that to work. Would be too easy for too many people to spot and corrected in the lines within a very short time frame.

Not when you get the best odds with 10 different offshore accounts.
It's a money-maker.
Just watch.

 

[yyz]

Are we not all adults? Fade or follow or let it go. Cmone!

Let me ask you this.

You see this guys great record and think, "Wow! I need to follow him!"

So, he posts 10 plays in MLB, and you bet them. Now, he goes 0-10. Well, people lose, so you shrug it off. Then, you notice he deleted the losing plays, and posted winners. Do you just laugh it off?

This isn't as simple as "letting it go".

 

[Wayne Vegas]

End of Sunday totals

Steaks
3-2
+$1,860

Underdogs
4-7
-$7,020

Complete bullshit. Your record on dogs is 1-7. I guarantee if Pittsburgh would have lost today you wouldn?t have mentioned it. You never said anything about playing it again after the rain out. You are a fraud and a liar. Just like when that -600 square favorite disappeared from your basketball thread and someone called you on your bullshit.

 

[STEEL CITY SELECTIONS]

i bet the pirates yesterday, and they got rained out.....


im gonna go 2-0 today with pirates today....because looks like their gonna sweep doubleheader

at my make believe sports book..

you always win your rain out bet the next time that team plays, but only if they win.


if they lose its no-bet.....which is really kool


you need to have like 10 or 15 sports books man maybe you will find one that has the same rain out feature mine does,.

 

[Bombs]

Not when you get the best odds with 10 different offshore accounts.
It's a money-maker.
Just watch.

Since you are blind playing it in a system, the number you get is irrelevant.

You are basically saying that any system would work with the best possible line, which everyone is already looking for as is.

You have cited this system based on your experience, when empirical data supporting it or refuting it is readily available.

 

[203Hoosier]

Then let's see your "data."
My bankroll is my data.
Maybe I'm getting lucky and choosing the right two teams each year.
We shall see.
You will see.

 

[Bombs]

Then let's see your "data."
My bankroll is my data.
Maybe I'm getting lucky and choosing the right two teams each year.
We shall see.
You will see.

I only use bet labs for ncaa basketball, so my account is not active. But you can test or create any system.

 

[Bombs]

Then let's see your "data."
My bankroll is my data.
Maybe I'm getting lucky and choosing the right two teams each year.
We shall see.
You will see.

Also, if this is such a foolproof system its really stupid to pick only 2 teams. You should pick at least 10 to diffuse the risk and increase the volume for your ROI.

 

[203Hoosier]

Also, if this is such a foolproof system its really stupid to pick only 2 teams. You should pick at least 10 to diffuse the risk and increase the volume for your ROI.

Hello? Can you read/comprehend?
It's IMPOSSIBLE to use more than two teams.
Every NL team plays every NL team, and every AL team plays every AL team every season.
You can't pick two teams who play themselves in the same season.
It's got to be two teams....max....one from each league...who do not play each other in interleague play.
We've already been over this.
10 teams? Umm....what happens when my teams play each other?
C'mon....don't be lazy.
This is not that complicated.
Watch and learn.

 

[Bombs]

Hello? Can you read/comprehend?
It's IMPOSSIBLE to use more than two teams.
Every NL team plays every NL team, and every AL team plays every AL team every season.
You can't pick two teams who play themselves in the same season.
It's got to be two teams....max....one from each league...who do not play each other in interleague play.
We've already been over this.
10 teams? Umm....what happens when my teams play each other?
C'mon....don't be lazy.
This is not that complicated.
Watch and learn.

It?s actually not impossible. It?s entirely possible. If two opposite sides of the same system played each other you would play no one. You could include every team if you wanted. That would only leave you with matchups where a team off a win is playing a team off a loss or betting against a team off a loss playing a team off a win. If your system which as you have stated is based solely on whether a team had won or lost its last game when the Yankees or Colorado off a win are playing a team off a win or they are off a loss playing a team off a loss you will be BETTING AGAINST THIS SUPPOSEDLY AMAZING SYSTEM BECAUSE THERE IS NOTHING UNIQUE ABOUT THE YANKEES OR COLORADO OTHER THAN THAT YOU PICKED THEM AT RANDOM.

Turns out my reading comprehension is good. So is my understanding of simple statistics.

Yours isn?t.

 

[203Hoosier]

WRONG!
The idea is that you have a play EVERYDAY on the SAME team. It is IMPOSSIBLE to know which teams are going to be more streaky than the others. There's no crystal ball.
Are you that dumb?
You are looking to deep into this.
Make up your own system, if you don't like mine. Nobody's forcing you to play it.
You are on "ignore" now. They have a feature for that here. I won't be able to see (thank God!) what you post.
I'll only post MY system and you will see.
It's so dumbed-down, even you will be able to follow it.
I'm sharing it this year for the first time, because I know it's a proven winner.
I'm not a tout and I'm not asking for money. I'm trying to help people who lose year after year to the books.
You can lead a horse to water....
Enjoy the MLB season.
I'll be counting my system profits, as usual, in the fall.
And who said anything about the Yankees? Read much? The chosen teams are TORONTO and Colorado, not the Yankees.
You're helpless. Books love guys like you. You don't even understand what's going on. I'd love to book your action.
Reading is fundamental.....TORONTO and Colorado. The streak is already up $$ on the year.
I won so many units in basketball, and with Michigan to win at 28-1 for $300 and a $600 Villanova moneyline bet, I can certainly bump my plays to $5k each, which is the max bet at most places I'm allowed to play.
Wanna bet that my system is UP money at the end of the year? I'll even give you 10-1 odds on it. This is the way baseball has been played for years. It's a streaky game.
I'll stop posting after game 162 of the regular season if the streak doesn't make money. THAT's how confident I am.
So, sit on the sidelines and doubt, fade, or jump on board, Proving you wrong is going to be as sweet as cashing out at the end of the year.
The math is always on my side. That's the way baseball works. Teams get hot and then they get cold.
You are beyond help. I will be laughing at you this entire season.
Thanks for the entertainment!

 

[203Hoosier]

One other thing. If anybody is going to follow just ONE of the two strategies I posted, it's the STREAKS. Proven winner over many decades. The bank account confirms this.
I was red hot all season in college hoops, so I'm DUE for a less than stellar performance with the underdogs. (Almost every basketball game I posted the last month of the season hit, and hit in ways they should have it...like backdoor covers, etc.) Things were going too well in college hoops, and I even admitted it on many occasions in that forum to the readers. But I never cooled off. The worm is certainly due to turn with my capping underdogs. But it will be in positive numbers when the season ends.
Take the easy way with the streaks, or don't, and kick yourself later.
You're welcome.

 

[Birdie313]

Hoosier, you are a fraud. You?ve been caught, let it go.

 

[Dimebag]

Hoosier, you are a fraud. You?ve been caught, let it go.

I have watched Hoosier put up one ML winner after another in the CBB section this year and trust me that he isn't some fugazi. Who cares if he had a slip up with a post early in the season in MLB. Maybe he got his hands on some crazy doobage, who knows. All I know is that it takes knowing something about handicapping sports to see what he has done. Not even looking at the dollar figures. I have followed his plays all along. Thanks for helping us Hoosier.