Let's quickly go over the results from the 2nd Test. A profit of 2.5 points were gained as Karmison lost in his match-up against Flintoff and the later also won man of the match. The profit was gained from recommending the Pommies at 6.00 for 1 points. The match-up of McGrath and Lee was void because McGrath took no part.
Moving onto the 3rd Test and the momentum has swung England's way. I must point out that over the last 5 years when test's are played back-to-back (less than a week inbetween games) the winning side win or draw 82% of the time.
I have been going on for some time how Australia would struggle when they eventually lose the services of both McGrath and Warne. Well the 2nd Test showed that fact up. If it had not been for Warne with his bowling, England would have won the 2nd Test as easily as Australia had won the first.
I wasn't aware of the fact until it was highlighted on the television that Australia allow 120 more runs on average per innings when McGrath is not in the team. That is an alarming stat for Austarlians and clearly shows how important their strike bowler is to his team.
Traditionally, Old Trafford the venue for the 3rd Test is renowned for being a turning wicket from day 1 of a test. The groundsman is confident that will not be the case this time around. It will be hard and fast with plenty of bounce. That will still make Warne a handful to play but not as much as first feared.
If Australia are to win this test then it will be Warne who will cause the damage as the pitch starts to wear from day 3 onwards (if it gets that far).
The books have been quick to react to England's performance and there is absolutly no value in any of the three possible results unless you are a die hard Australian who would back your country to win even if they were in the Downhill sking or Bobsleigh at the Olympics.
So my recommendations for the 3rd Test are as follows;
1 point S. Warne (Man of the Match) @ 9.00
2 points Warne to beat Giles (2 player match-up) @ 1.72
1 point J. Langer (top Australian bat .. both innings combinded) @ 5.50
1 point M. Clarke (top Australian bat .. both innings combinded) @ 7.00
Moving onto the 3rd Test and the momentum has swung England's way. I must point out that over the last 5 years when test's are played back-to-back (less than a week inbetween games) the winning side win or draw 82% of the time.
I have been going on for some time how Australia would struggle when they eventually lose the services of both McGrath and Warne. Well the 2nd Test showed that fact up. If it had not been for Warne with his bowling, England would have won the 2nd Test as easily as Australia had won the first.
I wasn't aware of the fact until it was highlighted on the television that Australia allow 120 more runs on average per innings when McGrath is not in the team. That is an alarming stat for Austarlians and clearly shows how important their strike bowler is to his team.
Traditionally, Old Trafford the venue for the 3rd Test is renowned for being a turning wicket from day 1 of a test. The groundsman is confident that will not be the case this time around. It will be hard and fast with plenty of bounce. That will still make Warne a handful to play but not as much as first feared.
If Australia are to win this test then it will be Warne who will cause the damage as the pitch starts to wear from day 3 onwards (if it gets that far).
The books have been quick to react to England's performance and there is absolutly no value in any of the three possible results unless you are a die hard Australian who would back your country to win even if they were in the Downhill sking or Bobsleigh at the Olympics.
So my recommendations for the 3rd Test are as follows;
1 point S. Warne (Man of the Match) @ 9.00
2 points Warne to beat Giles (2 player match-up) @ 1.72
1 point J. Langer (top Australian bat .. both innings combinded) @ 5.50
1 point M. Clarke (top Australian bat .. both innings combinded) @ 7.00