So what does that tell you...
I have only posted a few plays in the 12 years that I've been on the site. (What I did post bombed, so my superstitious side took over) And since my record has been terrible, I'll stop short of taking the Pack on the ML and say this... It is ripe for the picking. I think that the public perception of Seattle's defense, has left the stratosphere. Plays like Cam Chancellor jumping over the line have cemented in people's minds that they are super human. Sure it was cool, but there are tons of guys athletic enough to pull that off if timed right. Just the type of stuff Yahoo and ESPN use to bring in casual fans. The bottom line is that you can run on Seattle. Eddie lacy Sets the tone for their power running game and will be tough to stop. Starks can get north and south in a hurry and they're both decent running the screen. If Seattle commits the numbers in the box to take lacy out of the game, then I think even a hobbled Rodgers has enough weapons to be effective. I'm not buying seattles offense either. They seem to do just enough to get it done. But remember all of the drama they had earlier in the year? I'm not sure that they really resolved their issues other than the fact that winning is the best way to hide skeletons in the closet. So, if they find themselves in a game or even get behind... Things could get ugly again.
I will be on GB every way possible, and have them in a prop to play NE in the SB. I'm slightly up for the season, so this will determine my season as well. Win or lose... I think this is the play.
I have only posted a few plays in the 12 years that I've been on the site. (What I did post bombed, so my superstitious side took over) And since my record has been terrible, I'll stop short of taking the Pack on the ML and say this... It is ripe for the picking. I think that the public perception of Seattle's defense, has left the stratosphere. Plays like Cam Chancellor jumping over the line have cemented in people's minds that they are super human. Sure it was cool, but there are tons of guys athletic enough to pull that off if timed right. Just the type of stuff Yahoo and ESPN use to bring in casual fans. The bottom line is that you can run on Seattle. Eddie lacy Sets the tone for their power running game and will be tough to stop. Starks can get north and south in a hurry and they're both decent running the screen. If Seattle commits the numbers in the box to take lacy out of the game, then I think even a hobbled Rodgers has enough weapons to be effective. I'm not buying seattles offense either. They seem to do just enough to get it done. But remember all of the drama they had earlier in the year? I'm not sure that they really resolved their issues other than the fact that winning is the best way to hide skeletons in the closet. So, if they find themselves in a game or even get behind... Things could get ugly again.
I will be on GB every way possible, and have them in a prop to play NE in the SB. I'm slightly up for the season, so this will determine my season as well. Win or lose... I think this is the play.
