Everything's just fine in Patriot nation.

[airportis]

Patriots are irrelevant.

Haven't won shit in what, 5 years?

Whole team is on the decline. Moss getting up there in age. Wilfork might walk. Suspect secondary.:sadwave:


I'm sure I'm not the only one who finds it hilarious that you're so pathetic of a fan that you have to jerk off to Peyton Manning losing to make it feel like your team is significant, even though they're at home watching, just like you.


Pats division was a cake walk for years. Bills suck, Dolphins were horrible, Jets were never any good.

Oh how the times have changed. I wouldn't be surprised if NE doesn't even make the playoffs next year.

 

[rusty]

and you made this RIDICULOUS post...these teams play the Colts TWICE EVERY YEAR!!!!:142smilie

I was talking about the Patriots.

 

[rusty]

All it takes is a few - - - - - - - - to gang up on one person and blow things out of content.....I actually get a kick out of a few - - - - - - - getting all worked up over nothing.Whats more mind-boggling is the attention the thread got??That was not my intent.

I was just trying to state the Pats/Colts play a lot against each other ,more so than most for a non-conference opponent.That's all...:mj07:

In fact the thread was based on Manning losing.

 

[Jaxx]

0-3 in super bowls they didnt tape the opposotion

3-0 in super bowl they taped the opposition

Cheaten low life belicheck. Yea I want him as a coach. Like Tom Brady though.

 

[rusty]

Cheaten low life belicheck. Yea I want him as a coach. Like Tom Brady though.

I think the cheater thing is overblown.However his act at press conferences and his stubbornness sometimes in his coaching decisions are getting old.

Now he want's to run both the O and D?That sounds like trouble to me.

 

[shamrock]

what?
I often wonder if there is a brain in your head.:shrug:

gjn,,owtkast, I tried to worn you from the start of this thread.

 

[smurphy]

Pats fans are like a million CarterCubs. It takes that kind of mentality to start a thread about your team when you aren't even in the game.

...Eyes shifting to Vinnie as well.:nono:

 

[rusty]

gjn,,owtkast, I tried to worn you from the start of this thread.

What so hard to understand?I was glad to see Manning lose,not so much that the Saints won.

You obviously are not a hardcore Pats fan,but that ok.

 

[jr11]

I know this was stated but to Rusty, and to break it down further, I will use the Steelers from last years results....

2 games versus each division opponent = 6 games total

Played the whole AFC West, this rotates each year, = 4 games

Played the whole NFC North, this also rotates each season, = 4 games

That leaves 2 other games, this is determined WHERE you finished the previous year in your own division, for the Steelers it was first, hence winning the SB over Arizona. My point, since the played the whole AFC West, their other 2 games would have been agains the NO.1 divisonal team in the other AFC divisions (EAST-SOUTH), which was Tennessee and Miami.

Going into next season, Pittsburgh's OTHER 2 games will be against teams that ALSO finish third in their division, i.e. I think they play the whole AFC South, therefore it would be Oakland and Miami who I think both finished third in the West and East respectively.

So, because INDY and NE each have been dominate over the last decade or so, each winning their divisions, yes they will play each other every year regardless of the division rotations. This is how the system is set up, pretty much why I thought Pittsburgh would make the playoffs again, hence becasue they finished first the previous year, INDY and both NE came in second and we avoided them by getting TENN and Miami.

 

[rusty]

I know this was stated but to Rusty, and to break it down further, I will use the Steelers from last years results....

2 games versus each division opponent = 6 games total

Played the whole AFC West, this rotates each year, = 4 games

Played the whole NFC North, this also rotates each season, = 4 games

That leaves 2 other games, this is determined WHERE you finished the previous year in your own division, for the Steelers it was first, hence winning the SB over Arizona. My point, since the played the whole AFC West, their other 2 games would have been agains the NO.1 divisonal team in the other AFC divisions (EAST-SOUTH), which was Tennessee and Miami.

Going into next season, Pittsburgh's OTHER 2 games will be against teams that ALSO finish third in their division, i.e. I think they play the whole AFC South, therefore it would be Oakland and Miami who I think both finished third in the West and East respectively.

So, because INDY and NE each have been dominate over the last decade or so, each winning their divisions, yes they will play each other every year regardless of the division rotations. This is how the system is set up, pretty much why I thought Pittsburgh would make the playoffs again, hence becasue they finished first the previous year, INDY and both NE came in second and we avoided them by getting TENN and Miami.

I know how the system works.I made a statement that when it comes to Pats/Colts its rigged.I wasn't serious.It just seems they play alot thats all.