Essay on John Kerry
Excerpt from recent Ann Coulter essay on John Kerry
Kerry was indisputably brave in Vietnam, and it's kind of cute to
see Democrats pretend to admire military service. Physical courage,
like chastity, is something liberals usually deride, but are tickled
when it accidentally manifests itself in one of their own. One has to
stand in awe of Kerry's military service 33 years ago. Of course,
that's where it ends,including with Kerry -- inasmuch as, upon his
return from war in 1970,he promptly began trashing his fellow Vietnam
vets by calling them genocidal murderers.
But if Bush can't talk to Kerry about the horrors of war, then Kerry
sure as hell can't talk to anyone about the plight of the middle class.
Kerry's life experience consists of living off other men's money by
marrying their wives and daughters. For over 30 years, Kerry's primary
occupation has been stalking lonely heiresses. Not to get back to his
combat experience, but Kerry sees a room full of wealthy widows as "a
target-rich environment." This is a guy whose experience dealing with
tax problems is based on spending his entire adult life being supported
by rich women.What does a kept man know about taxes?
In 1970, Kerry married into the family of Julia Thorne -- a family
estimated to be worth about $300 million. She got depressed, so he
promptly left her and was soon seen catting around with Hollywood
starlets,mostly while the cad was still married. (Apparently, JFK
really was his mentor.)
Thorne is well-bred enough to say nothing ill of her Lothario
ex-husband. He is, after all, the father of her children -- a fact that
never seemed to constrain him. When Kerry was about to become the
latest Heinz family charity, he sought to have his marriage to Thorne
annulled, despite the fact that it had produced two children. It seems
his second meal ticket,Teresa Heinz, wanted the first marriage annulled
-- and Heinz is worth more than $700 million.
Kerry claims he will stand up to powerful interests, but he can't even
stand up to his wife. Heinz made Kerry sign a prenuptial
agreement,presumably aware of how careless he is with other people's
property,such as other people's Vietnam War medals, which Kerry threw
on the ground during a 1971 anti-war demonstration.
At pains to make Kerry sound like a normal American, his campaign has
described how Kerry risked everything, mortgaging his home in Boston to
help pay for his presidential campaign. Technically, Kerry took out a
$6 million mortgage for "his share" of "the family's home" -- which was
bought with the Heinz family fortune. (Why should he spend his own
money? He didn't throw away his own medals.) I'm sure the average
working stiff in Massachusetts can relate to a guy who borrows $6
million against his house to pay for TV ads.
Kerry's campaign has stoutly insisted that he will pay off the mortgage
himself, with no help from his rich wife. Let's see: According to tax
returns released by his campaign, in 2002, Kerry's income was $144,091.
But as The Washington Post recently reported, even a $5 million mortgage
paid back over 30 years at favorable interest rates would cost $30,389
a month --or $364,668 a year.
The Democrats' joy at nominating Kerry is perplexing. To be sure,
liberals take a peculiar, wrathful pleasure in supporting pacifist
military types. And Kerry's life story is not without a certain feral
aggression. But if we're going to determine fitness for office based on
life experience,Kerry clearly has no experience dealing with problems
of typical Americans since he is a cad and a gigolo living in the lap
of other men's money.
Kerry is like some character in a Balzac novel, an adventurer twirling
the end of his mustache and preying on rich women. This low-born
poseur with his threadbare pseudo-Brahmin family bought a political
career with onerich woman's money, dumped her, and made off with
another heiress to enable him to run for president.
If Democrats want to talk about middle-class tax cuts, couldn't they
nominate someone who hasn't been a poodle to rich women for past 33
years? Don't forget: John Kerry is strong on defense
He voted to kill the Bradley Fighting Vehicle
He voted to kill the M-1 Abrams Tank
He voted to kill every Aircraft carrier laid down from 1988
He voted to kill the Aegis anti aircraft system
He voted to Kill the F-15 strike eagle
He voted to Kill the Block 60 F-16
He voted to Kill the P-3 Orion upgrade
He voted to Kill the B-1
He voted to Kill the B-2
He voted to Kill the Patriot anti Missile system
He voted to Kill the FA-18
He voted to Kill the B-2
He voted to Kill the F117
In short, he voted to kill every military appropriation for the
development and deployment of every weapons systems since 1988 to
include the battle armor for our troops.
With Kerry as president our Army will be made up of naked men running
around with sticks and clubs.
He also voted to kill all anti terrorism activities of every agency of
the U.S. Government and to cut the funding of the FBI by 60%, to cut
the funding for the CIA by 80%, and cut the funding for the NSA by 80%.
But then he voted to increase OUR funding for U.N operations by 800%!!!
Is THIS a President YOU want?
If you are interested in the character of the next president of the
United States, please forward this to those you want to inform.
Excerpt from recent Ann Coulter essay on John Kerry
Kerry was indisputably brave in Vietnam, and it's kind of cute to
see Democrats pretend to admire military service. Physical courage,
like chastity, is something liberals usually deride, but are tickled
when it accidentally manifests itself in one of their own. One has to
stand in awe of Kerry's military service 33 years ago. Of course,
that's where it ends,including with Kerry -- inasmuch as, upon his
return from war in 1970,he promptly began trashing his fellow Vietnam
vets by calling them genocidal murderers.
But if Bush can't talk to Kerry about the horrors of war, then Kerry
sure as hell can't talk to anyone about the plight of the middle class.
Kerry's life experience consists of living off other men's money by
marrying their wives and daughters. For over 30 years, Kerry's primary
occupation has been stalking lonely heiresses. Not to get back to his
combat experience, but Kerry sees a room full of wealthy widows as "a
target-rich environment." This is a guy whose experience dealing with
tax problems is based on spending his entire adult life being supported
by rich women.What does a kept man know about taxes?
In 1970, Kerry married into the family of Julia Thorne -- a family
estimated to be worth about $300 million. She got depressed, so he
promptly left her and was soon seen catting around with Hollywood
starlets,mostly while the cad was still married. (Apparently, JFK
really was his mentor.)
Thorne is well-bred enough to say nothing ill of her Lothario
ex-husband. He is, after all, the father of her children -- a fact that
never seemed to constrain him. When Kerry was about to become the
latest Heinz family charity, he sought to have his marriage to Thorne
annulled, despite the fact that it had produced two children. It seems
his second meal ticket,Teresa Heinz, wanted the first marriage annulled
-- and Heinz is worth more than $700 million.
Kerry claims he will stand up to powerful interests, but he can't even
stand up to his wife. Heinz made Kerry sign a prenuptial
agreement,presumably aware of how careless he is with other people's
property,such as other people's Vietnam War medals, which Kerry threw
on the ground during a 1971 anti-war demonstration.
At pains to make Kerry sound like a normal American, his campaign has
described how Kerry risked everything, mortgaging his home in Boston to
help pay for his presidential campaign. Technically, Kerry took out a
$6 million mortgage for "his share" of "the family's home" -- which was
bought with the Heinz family fortune. (Why should he spend his own
money? He didn't throw away his own medals.) I'm sure the average
working stiff in Massachusetts can relate to a guy who borrows $6
million against his house to pay for TV ads.
Kerry's campaign has stoutly insisted that he will pay off the mortgage
himself, with no help from his rich wife. Let's see: According to tax
returns released by his campaign, in 2002, Kerry's income was $144,091.
But as The Washington Post recently reported, even a $5 million mortgage
paid back over 30 years at favorable interest rates would cost $30,389
a month --or $364,668 a year.
The Democrats' joy at nominating Kerry is perplexing. To be sure,
liberals take a peculiar, wrathful pleasure in supporting pacifist
military types. And Kerry's life story is not without a certain feral
aggression. But if we're going to determine fitness for office based on
life experience,Kerry clearly has no experience dealing with problems
of typical Americans since he is a cad and a gigolo living in the lap
of other men's money.
Kerry is like some character in a Balzac novel, an adventurer twirling
the end of his mustache and preying on rich women. This low-born
poseur with his threadbare pseudo-Brahmin family bought a political
career with onerich woman's money, dumped her, and made off with
another heiress to enable him to run for president.
If Democrats want to talk about middle-class tax cuts, couldn't they
nominate someone who hasn't been a poodle to rich women for past 33
years? Don't forget: John Kerry is strong on defense
He voted to kill the Bradley Fighting Vehicle
He voted to kill the M-1 Abrams Tank
He voted to kill every Aircraft carrier laid down from 1988
He voted to kill the Aegis anti aircraft system
He voted to Kill the F-15 strike eagle
He voted to Kill the Block 60 F-16
He voted to Kill the P-3 Orion upgrade
He voted to Kill the B-1
He voted to Kill the B-2
He voted to Kill the Patriot anti Missile system
He voted to Kill the FA-18
He voted to Kill the B-2
He voted to Kill the F117
In short, he voted to kill every military appropriation for the
development and deployment of every weapons systems since 1988 to
include the battle armor for our troops.
With Kerry as president our Army will be made up of naked men running
around with sticks and clubs.
He also voted to kill all anti terrorism activities of every agency of
the U.S. Government and to cut the funding of the FBI by 60%, to cut
the funding for the CIA by 80%, and cut the funding for the NSA by 80%.
But then he voted to increase OUR funding for U.N operations by 800%!!!
Is THIS a President YOU want?
If you are interested in the character of the next president of the
United States, please forward this to those you want to inform.
