FAA proposes record $10 mln fine for Southwest Air

vinnie

la vita ? buona
Forum Member
Sep 11, 2000
59,163
212
0
Here
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - U.S. aviation regulators on Thursday proposed to fine Southwest Airlines Co a record $10.2 million for allegedly failing to inspect planes for structural cracks.:scared

The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) said Southwest continued to fly uninspected aircraft even after the carrier notified the agency that it had missed a mandatory deadline to complete the work.

"The FAA is taking action against Southwest Airlines for a failing to follow rules that are designed to protect passengers and crew," said Nicholas Sabatini, the agency's associate administrator for safety.

The FAA said there were no safety incidents related to the missed inspections of Boeing Co 737 aircraft but the allegations and the fine amounted to a startling mark against the airline that has been an industry model for efficient operation for nearly 40 years.

The airline said in a statement late on Wednesday the inspections were routine and redundant. Southwest said it acted promptly and responsibly and that flight safety was never compromised.

Southwest shares fell 49 cents, or nearly 3.8 percent, to $12.50 on the New York Stock Exchange. The stock rose slightly after hours before retreating to its closing price.

Southwest is the biggest U.S. carrier by market value at $9.5 billion.

UNINSPECTED PLANES

Southwest flies only 737 planes and the inspection program was part of an industry-wide FAA initiative to more closely examine structural fatigue in all types of older planes. Most big U.S. airlines are slowly modernizing their fleets.

While commercial jetliners are built to fly for decades, the repetitive fuselage inspections imposed in 2004 are aimed at finding any minor skin cracks or other structural issues that occur with heavy use and usually can be fixed easily.

But the FAA asserted that Southwest operated 46 planes on nearly 60,000 flights while "failing to comply" with the inspection requirement between June 2006 and March 2007.

The carrier continued for eight days to operate the same planes on more than 1,400 additional flights after discovering last March that it missed the inspection deadline, the FAA said. This breach, the FAA said, prompted the heavy fine.

Cracks were found on six planes after the inspections were completed, the FAA said.

Southwest said in a statement that it acted promptly once it discovered the lapse. The carrier also said it consulted Boeing about the missed inspections as well as the continued operation of those aircraft for up to 10-days while the work was completed.

Southwest said Boeing concluded the compliance plan was technically valid. "In Boeing's opinion, the safety of the Southwest fleet was not compromised."

A Boeing official confirmed the consultation.

Southwest said the FAA "approved our actions and considered the matter closed as of April 2007."

FAA ROLE QUESTIONED

Questions were also raised about the FAA's role and whether its oversight was insufficient. Congressional lawmakers want to know why it took so long for the FAA to act and why uninspected planes were not grounded immediately.

The House of Representatives Transportation Committee is investigating and the panel's chairman, Rep. James Oberstar, a Minnesota Democrat, has scheduled a news conference for Friday. A hearing is planned for April.

Sen. Patty Murray, a Washington state Democrat and chairman of the appropriations subcommittee that funds FAA operations, called the safety violations "grotesque" and an "inexcusable lapse."

Murray was critical of the airline but also promised to hold FAA officials responsible.

"We need to ask serious questions as to why it took the FAA so long to discover them," she said.

The FAA said is sending a team of inspectors -- those that do not normally work closely with Southwest at its base in Dallas -- to review the maintenance program. Airlines overall are complying with the timelines for completing structural inspections, the agency said.

Southwest can appeal the proposed fine, which would be the largest ever against an airline if enforced. The largest to date is a $9.5 million penalty against Eastern Airlines in the 1980s.
 

dawgball

Registered User
Forum Member
Feb 12, 2000
10,652
39
48
50
I agree with your bro-in-law, but I have never had the pleasure of flying Midwest which gets rave reviews.

Southwest is the biggest U.S. carrier by market value at $9.5 billion.

I didn't know this.
 

vinnie

la vita ? buona
Forum Member
Sep 11, 2000
59,163
212
0
Here
I agree with your bro-in-law, but I have never had the pleasure of flying Midwest which gets rave reviews.



I didn't know this.

Did you know about the structural cracks ? :scared .......kurby
 

DOGS THAT BARK

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 13, 1999
19,500
175
63
Bowling Green Ky
Southwest was doing great few yeas back when other airlines were struggling--their key to success was they hedged fuel commodities and made a killing.
 

dawgball

Registered User
Forum Member
Feb 12, 2000
10,652
39
48
50
The hedged fuel costs was certainly a big boost to their bottom line. But it is certainly not the whole story.

They use one type of plane as mentioned in this article. That reduces parts costs, labor costs, training costs, pilot costs, etc. etc.

Also, their employees are treated well as is evident when you talk to one of them. Their culture is very friendly and is why I am willing to look past their oddities and still give them as much business as I can.
 

Dr Feelgood

StonedPimp
Forum Member
Feb 3, 2001
3,608
24
38
Las Vegas
Flown then exclusively since 1997...this won't stop me...In all those years I have been late by more than an hour ONCE!!! Yes ONCE!!!! And it was 2 weeks ago Over 75+ flights....

Great customer service, great prices, I get my boarding passes as early as possible (24 hour pre check in) and am always on the first boarding class. Nonstop flights from Manchester to Vegas, Cali, and Florida...I have nothing bad to say about them.

So what if they serve peanuts and wheat thins...
 

dawgball

Registered User
Forum Member
Feb 12, 2000
10,652
39
48
50
selling....for 5 bucks??? :mj07:

Many of the airlines are starting to serve zero complimentary snacks and beverages. Not even water. You must purchase a bottle of water.

I don't blame them. They have to cut costs where they can. But it just makes Southwest that much more attractive to me.
 

ImFeklhr

Raconteur
Forum Member
Oct 3, 2005
4,585
129
0
San Francisco
I never understood the whole "food on a plane thing"...

Beverages, I can understand.

Who can't wait 4 or 5 hours to eat something? Like our society is lacking for food options, so we really rely on air travel to sustain our appetites.
------------
I got THIS e-mail from Southwest tonight:
------------
Dear Rapid Rewards Member:


Southwest Airlines: We take Safety Seriously
You may have heard that Southwest Airlines was fined by the FAA regarding recent aircraft inspections. First and foremost, we want to assure you this was never and is not a safety of flight issue.

From our inception, Southwest Airlines has maintained a rigorous Culture of Safety?and has maintained that same dedication for more than 37 years. It is and always has been our number one priority to ensure the Safety of every Southwest Customer and Employee. ?We?ve got a 37-year history of very safe operations, one of the safest operations in the world, and we?re safer today than we?ve ever been,? said Southwest CEO Gary Kelly.

Receipt of the FAA letter of penalty gives us the chance to present the facts which we feel will support our actions taken in March 2007. The FAA penalty is related to one of many routine inspections on our aircraft fleet involving an extremely small area in one of the many overlapping inspections. These inspections were designed to detect early signs of skin cracking.

Southwest Airlines discovered the missed inspection area, disclosed it to the FAA, and promptly reinspected all potentially affected aircraft in March 2007. The FAA approved our actions and considered the matter closed as of April 2007.

The Boeing Company has stated its support of Southwest's aggressive compliance plan. Southwest acted responsibly and the safety of the fleet was not compromised, Boeing said.

Former National Transportation Safety Board Inspector-in-Charge Greg Feith said after a review of the available data and information that it?s apparent that there was no risk to the flying public in March 2007 while Southwest Airlines performed their program to re-inspect the small area of aircraft fuselages identified.

Southwest consistently maintains a Leadership role in developing maintenance programs for the Boeing 737 aircraft.

As always, we commit to keeping you informed. Please check southwest.com for periodic updates.
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top