Fade guy wants

eeeerock

Registered User
Forum Member
Oct 31, 2006
9,050
33
48
LA BURNS: Joker, could you two be bigger assholes?
Joker: Yes.


LA BURNS: He is going to find a way to lose money
Joker: So far he's a winner.


LA BURNS: So to me the situation is simple.
Joker: It's not. This "fade" isn't even real. He's fake. Eric posts these plays as a superstition he thinks helps him with his own bets. His fade threads have been clogging up this forum for years.

LA BURNS: If you think this guy is some sort of whale
Joker: Burns, we are all whales here. I'm not sure about you though.

LA BURNS: looks like eeee and others made $ off of this situation last night
Joker: Nope. You aren't paying attention. Eric said "Chiefs" and you want to make that into a "Texans" play, then you must be a psychic.


Springer Final Thought: If you use a fade to place your wagers, you also enjoy The Big Wheel at casino's and the salad bar at the Golden Corral. Let's band together as capper's and share real information and not a superstition.




<iframe src="https://giphy.com/embed/srg19CG0cKMuI" width="480" height="270" frameBorder="0" class="giphy-embed" allowFullScreen></iframe><p><a href="https://giphy.com/gifs/applause-clapping-oscars-srg19CG0cKMuI">via GIPHY</a></p>
See Joker u can try and make a spin on this thread as much as u like. I should have put that I'm playing the Chiefs as I usually don't make a statement whether fading or playing along. Last night I felt obligated to state I was playing chiefs as he had a winning day going. The side won't change from the original post he never switches teams might text about upgrading the amount but that's it...... Thanks Burns as some of us get this thread. Joker the only way you won money today was if you don't pay attention to his dollar amount.
 

The Joker

Registered
Forum Member
Aug 3, 2008
28,116
360
83
47
Tennessee
www.madjacksports.com
See Joker u can try and make a spin on this thread as much as u like. I should have put that I'm playing the Chiefs as I usually don't make a statement whether fading or playing along. Last night I felt obligated to state I was playing chiefs as he had a winning day going. The side won't change from the original post he never switches teams might text about upgrading the amount but that's it...... Thanks Burns as some of us get this thread. Joker the only way you won money today was if you don't pay attention to his dollar amount.


I know. Good luck with your plays this season. Hope you kill it.

<iframe src="https://giphy.com/embed/ceeFbVxiZzMBi" width="480" height="360" frameBorder="0" class="giphy-embed" allowFullScreen></iframe><p><a href="https://giphy.com/gifs/people-coffee-very-ceeFbVxiZzMBi">via GIPHY</a></p>..
 

eeeerock

Registered User
Forum Member
Oct 31, 2006
9,050
33
48
2014 was around 45% or so (I wasn't keeping close track then. Just a guess.)
2015 No clue but it was probably around even (or here either. Just a calculated guess)
2016 55% but that is a conservative number
2017 so far this fucking asshole is 60% PLUS!!!!! :142smilie:142smilie:142smilie:142smilie:142smilie


Fade away douche nuggets!:00hour:00hour:00hour:00hour:00hour

I will waste my time since I have some to kill.If your going to rely on his % on these plays per (jockey) GL, because obviously (Jockey) has his own beliefs and thoughts to how these plays are.There is always ways to make money in the betting world be it fading or tagging along but this jackass always has to come in here and try and start shit.I won't waste my time after this post,that's responding to his ignorance,I will continue to post as I always do per receiving my text from fade.Some get it and some don't!!! By the way Jockey =Joker since he wants to call me eric.
 

LuvThemDogs

Registered User
Forum Member
Dec 2, 2005
1,310
51
48
LA BURNS: looks like eeee and others made $ off of this situation last night
Joker: Nope. You aren't paying attention. Eric said "Chiefs" and you want to make that into a "Texans" play, then you must be a psychic.

This....
 

LuvThemDogs

Registered User
Forum Member
Dec 2, 2005
1,310
51
48
LTD and Joker, could you two be bigger assholes? eeee posts these plays for informational purposes - the guy is obviously a loser over time and people, as eeerock repeatedly states, can do whatever they want with the info he provides

Joker - are you bringing anything to the nfl forum as far as winning $ is concerned? and LTD, can you really not figure this out? the posted plays are what this guy is playing, and the idea is that, sooner or later regardless of his win % or whatever else Joker wants to spend his time tracking, he is going to find a way to lose money


so to me the situation is simple - if you think this guy is some sort of whale or if you don't have the mental capacity to follow along, stay out of the thread and spend your time elsewhere - looks like eeee and others made $ off of this situation last night maybe you all could have as well if you weren't busy trying to be assholes in someone else's thread


as always, good luck


LA Burns

Look...Nobody is an asshole except you for calling us assholes. Did you read anything in here or do you not have the ability to comprehend what you read?

I asked him who the play was on and got a smart ass response from him. Period! One guy in this thread knew what the play was on. That does not constitute "everyone."

He made it clear that the fade plays are the ones posted in these threads and yet he comes in here and says "playing the Chiefs." How fucking ignorant can you be to not see the confusion that might cause? Even if it's just a little confusing. Esp if you're actually betting real money and not monopoly money? I asked for clarity and got a wise ass comment. Why don't you read and try to understand instead of insinuating and making a fool of yourself?
 

yanno

Registered User
Forum Member
Sep 8, 2001
3,608
165
63
Ontario
200 Houston L
60 Jets W
40 chargers W
50 pitt L
30 SF L
40 GB W
40 seattle W
50 Balty W

I know that I should stay of out this. :mj22:

But it is very clear from the original post that the Fade was on Houston for 200. It was his biggest bet of the day, it appears. It is also obvious from the later post that the poster was playing the Chiefs because it was against Fade's biggest play of the day.

Talk about making a mountain out of a molehill! :lol:
 

ldabdou

Chillaxin
Forum Member
Dec 28, 2004
9,338
93
48
Nor Cal
I know that I should stay of out this. :mj22:

But it is very clear from the original post that the Fade was on Houston for 200. It was his biggest bet of the day, it appears. It is also obvious from the later post that the poster was playing the Chiefs because it was against Fade's biggest play of the day.

Talk about making a mountain out of a molehill! :lol:

The 200 bet wasn?t posted. You had to read between the lines when he said he?s playing the chiefs cuz he thinks he gives it all back. I was confused too as I had to read it a couple of times. Just sayin.
 

eeeerock

Registered User
Forum Member
Oct 31, 2006
9,050
33
48
The 200 bet wasn?t posted. You had to read between the lines when he said he?s playing the chiefs cuz he thinks he gives it all back. I was confused too as I had to read it a couple of times. Just sayin.

How can you say the 200 bet wasn't posted? It was the first bet on his card!!!! My bad that I didn't start the later thread with I'm playing Chiefs,exactly why I don't typically post what I'm fading or tagging along with,but as in the past his lower bet amounts have hit more then his big ones!! However to say the 200 $ bet wasn't posted is absurd..
 

ldabdou

Chillaxin
Forum Member
Dec 28, 2004
9,338
93
48
Nor Cal
How can you say the 200 bet wasn't posted? It was the first bet on his card!!!! My bad that I didn't start the later thread with I'm playing Chiefs,exactly why I don't typically post what I'm fading or tagging along with,but as in the past his lower bet amounts have hit more then his big ones!! However to say the 200 $ bet wasn't posted is absurd..

My bad if I didnt see it but I dont recall seeing it. I specifically went looking for it cuz I new he had a good day..Regardless...Thanks for your efforts...
 

the addict

BI-WINNING
Forum Member
Oct 9, 2009
13,034
116
0
39
PA proud
200 Houston L
60 Jets W
40 chargers W
50 pitt L
30 SF L
40 GB W
40 seattle W
50 Balty W

The initial post from above has been edited since yesterday....

Was the "200 Houston" posted initially?

If so i think its clear



If not like someone claimed.....i can see the confusion....

Eeerock says "playing the chiefs"...so assume fade wants chiefs...because he only lists the fades plays....see post #1 below for the "play is the cheifs"

We know he only lists the fades plays because he says he cannot be clearer he only lists the fades plays......see post #2 below


Then says he should have said he was playing chiefs and not the fades play..see post #3....which we wouldn't assume, because he only lists the fades plays


But....if the initial post had the "200 Houston" play listed...theni think it was clear he meant cheifs was opposite the fade


Playing Chiefs, he is having a good day think he gives it back with the big play!!!



I really don't know how much clearer to make what he wants, when the thread states Fade Wants and then the plays are listed.I usually don't declare what I'm fading or playing along with because I feel it just makes it to confusing, but felt entitled to do so tonight.



See Joker u can try and make a spin on this thread as much as u like. I should have put that I'm playing the Chiefs as I usually don't make a statement whether fading or playing along..






Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk
 

zig

Registered User
Forum Member
Feb 13, 2000
1,936
56
48
65
WI
I know that I should stay of out this. :mj22:

But it is very clear from the original post that the Fade was on Houston for 200. It was his biggest bet of the day, it appears. It is also obvious from the later post that the poster was playing the Chiefs because it was against Fade's biggest play of the day.

Talk about making a mountain out of a molehill! :lol:

This
 

eeeerock

Registered User
Forum Member
Oct 31, 2006
9,050
33
48
The initial post from above has been edited since yesterday....

Was the "200 Houston" posted initially?

If so i think its clear



If not like someone claimed.....i can see the confusion....

Eeerock says "playing the chiefs"...so assume fade wants chiefs...because he only lists the fades plays....see post #1 below for the "play is the cheifs"

We know he only lists the fades plays because he says he cannot be clearer he only lists the fades plays......see post #2 below


Then says he should have said he was playing chiefs and not the fades play..see post #3....which we wouldn't assume, because he only lists the fades plays


But....if the initial post had the "200 Houston" play listed...theni think it was clear he meant cheifs was opposite the fade

















Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk

It was edited to update the result of the play!!! On top of that there is always an amount after his plays!!!
 

eeeerock

Registered User
Forum Member
Oct 31, 2006
9,050
33
48
Was just going to say, haven't received anything so nothing from him tonight!!!! No need to look in all this mess for his play tonight!!
 

T-MONEY

Registered User
Forum Member
Aug 23, 2002
47
1
8
Parts Unknown
eeeerock, ignore the noise. your posts are some of the clearest on this forum. if folks are in too much hurry to actually read them, its not on you.

you do good work on this forum.

Thanks,
T-money
 

T OFF

Registered User
Forum Member
Sep 7, 2006
1,132
27
48
MCCOMB MS
Keep posting fade plays E!

Keep posting fade plays E!

Ima keep following my 17 pt system though it has went 50/50 last 2 weeks

BUFFALO ....SHOUDA

DALLAS.....COULDA

CLEVELAND.....WOULDA

😂 Ima stick with it till it goes to 💩 I just hate I'm the worse at loading up on 1-2 teams I like the most on system and they tank gotta break myself from that

Good luck tonight bud!:0008
 

LA Burns

Registered
Forum Member
Jun 11, 2003
3,909
32
0
New Orleans
seems to me the overall traffic on this site is down, way down

if I were eeerock I would consider not even worrying about posting this stuff anymore even though there are obviously people who take a look and have the ability to EASILY understand the concept


people like the ones who come in here and give this guy shit for absolutely no reason are the same people who drive quality posters away from MJ's

been coming here for 14 years don't go to any other gambling forums - there are some on this site who care WAY more about the general discussion forum than anything that has to do with gambling - that's totally fine but just stay in there if you have nothing to offer from a gambling perspective



it is what it is
 

parlayinn

Registered User
Forum Member
Mar 15, 2001
824
1
0
Was clear as day to me when I checked this thread yesterday. Surprised to now see these responses. These fade wants are helpful to me and I certainly appreciate them.
 

LA Burns

Registered
Forum Member
Jun 11, 2003
3,909
32
0
New Orleans
clear to everyone parlay, we're not talking about rocket science here


reminds me of all the people who ran hammer off from posting winners - a bunch of guys who got off posting in the gen discussion and mojo forums who haven't posted a sports pick in years but who went into / go into his threads regularly and gave him shit


how can you offer nothing ever and then go into people's threads who are trying to offer something and bitch and moan?? obviously it pisses me off
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top