Fade guy wants

[LuvThemDogs]

The initial post from above has been edited since yesterday....

Was the "200 Houston" posted initially?

If so i think its clear



If not like someone claimed.....i can see the confusion....

Eeerock says "playing the chiefs"...so assume fade wants chiefs...because he only lists the fades plays....see post #1 below for the "play is the cheifs"

We know he only lists the fades plays because he says he cannot be clearer he only lists the fades plays......see post #2 below


Then says he should have said he was playing chiefs and not the fades play..see post #3....which we wouldn't assume, because he only lists the fades plays


But....if the initial post had the "200 Houston" play listed...theni think it was clear he meant cheifs was opposite the fade

















Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk

Thanks Addict. He did not have the 200 Houston play listed initially. I remember checking that list and it wasn't on there. He added it later when he edited the tally after the game.

When people are gambling with real money and actually using his plays, it makes sense to be crystal clear. To some, I guess being vague works for them. Until they bet the wrong side and end up losing money.

 

[LuvThemDogs]

I really don't know how much clearer to make what he wants, when the thread states Fade Wants and then the plays are listed. I usually don't declare what I'm fading or playing along with because I feel it just makes it to confusing , but felt entitled to do so tonight.

Playing Chiefs, he is having a good day think he gives it back with the big play!!!

This makes it pretty clear that his post was confusing. Only an idiot can't see this or comprehend it. And his play was NOT listed on the list of picks until he edited it after the game. Quit making excuses for a lack of clarity.

 

[parlayinn]

The only relevant fact is whether the 200 Houston play was posted at the time he made the "playing Chiefs" post.

He did not have the 200 Houston play listed initially. I remember checking that list and it wasn't on there. He added it later when he edited the tally after the game.

And his play was NOT listed on the list of picks until he edited it after the game.

You are not being honest when you keep repeating he added it AFTER the game. I know I saw it before the game and before the "playing Chiefs" post because this thread was one of the only things I happened to look at before the game and the 200 unit play stood out to me.

Also, he didn't just say "playing chiefs" but clearly explained his personal opinion that Fade would "give it back with the big play." Houston was the only listed play much bigger than the others and only game remaining at the time he made that post.

 

[LuvThemDogs]

The only relevant fact is whether the 200 Houston play was posted at the time he made the "playing Chiefs" post.





You are not being honest when you keep repeating he added it AFTER the game. I know I saw it before the game and before the "playing Chiefs" post because this thread was one of the only things I happened to look at before the game and the 200 unit play stood out to me.

Also, he didn't just say "playing chiefs" but clearly explained his personal opinion that Fade would "give it back with the big play." Houston was the only listed play much bigger than the others and only game remaining at the time he made that post.

If it was there when he initially posted his play, it seems pretty obvious that he would have pointed it out to me as to being the play which was posted, rather than make a snide remark about how the fades plays are the only plays posted in here and explain how his posting works.

Maybe he changed it before game time, but I did not see it at the time of the original post of "playing Chiefs."

 

[Wayne Vegas]

If it was there when he initially posted his play, it seems pretty obvious that he would have pointed it out to me as to being the play which was posted, rather than make a snide remark about how the fades plays are the only plays posted in here and explain how his posting works.

Maybe he changed it before game time, but I did not see it at the time of the original post of "playing Chiefs."

The play was posted with the rest of them. I saw it around noon. I always check to see if he has any big square plays.

 

[LA Burns]

all of the fade's plays for the day were listed in the very 1st post that was made

the purpose of the thread is for the fade's plays to be posted, not necessarily for eeeerock's personal plays to be posted

you have to figure out from there what you want to do with that info - in this particular week's thread eeee went the extra mile after the daytime action and came back and said that the fade had a decent day and he thought that the profits were likely to be given back with the big play that the fade had Sunday night, which was obviously Houston - he went as far as to post the following at this time:


"Playing Chiefs, he is having a good day think he gives it back with the big play!!!"


The fade's big play was 200 on Houston - biggest play of the day by a lot. The idea was to fade it, hence the title of the post.


Hard for me to believe that there are people who can't follow along with this


That being said, should not have called LTD an asshole as he was just a bit confused - because the situation shouldn't be a confusing one, and because Joker has been coming into these threads on a weekly basis being a dick, I lumped them together.


Bottom line:


I like MJ's. I have been coming here since 2003 and as someone who gambles on a pretty regular basis I like to come and check the temperature of the different forums and see who's on what, etc. I very very rarely blindly tail as I don't need to and I don't like to as I have my own plays that I am confident in. But again I like to mine for info and this is one and only handicapping forum that I visit for that purpose. The more people who are here sharing relevant handicapping info the better this site is for everyone - and there is a negative effect on that volume of posters when people who have nothing to offer from a handicapping perspective give others who do a hard time for the wrong reasons. It is totally unnecessary and it undermines what this site is supposed to be about - sharing info to come up with opportunities to make money.



So from here - onward and upward (I hope)



As always, good luck



LA Burns

 

[eeeerock]

Seems like a few have computer problems or started drinking to soon on Sunday,kind of weird that some seen it at time of posting but others claim I added after game started....Well your never going to appease everyone no matter what you do..So lets just make false claims that the play was never posted yet there are still others saying yes it was posted at the beginning, like it was....What would I have to gain by claiming it was there if it wasn't,I don't think anyone would say yeah I saw it hadn't been posted...Some people really make you wonder.I gain nothing by posting these other then the chance to help others in some way maybe make $...Why I state use them whatever way helps you.....It does strike a nerve when I have these false claims saying the play wasn't posted in original thread when it was...I don't put the plays in any order other then the way I receive them from him...If you overlooked the first play when it was his biggest I don't know what to say,and I'm done with it.Will continue to post when I get them!!! Thanks to those who did stop by to confirm you saw them with original post,nothing fake from me!!!

 

[Salty]

I can't believe your still having to explain yourself. Buncha dried up string beans around here

 

[IE]

i will be closing this thread soon if the nonsense keeps up.