Faves and Overs

[green2240]

Did the 7 faves of a touchdown or more ALL cover?

Did 6 of 7 totals in those games go over?

Jesus, what a joke. Good to know that there is still some parity in the league

 

[Old School]

Did the 7 faves of a touchdown or more ALL cover?

Did 6 of 7 totals in those games go over?

Jesus, what a joke. Good to know that there is still some parity in the league

yes 7-0 the PAT as a given ..7 points

yes 6-1 totals "Over"

but the fact that 6 new playoff teams appear from the year before speaks more to the parity of the league..

good teams beat the shit out of shit teams year in and year out..

they are supposed to get the shit beat out of them ..

question is...will one lay the lumber..

odds makers have done a superior job in getting the lines to their liking

see below


YEAR TO DATE
CLOSING LINES

FAVS 74

DOGS..68

PUSH 3


OVERS..77

UNDERS..68

HOME DOGS...19-22-1

ya take the favs ya still getting juiced

ya take the "Overs" and ya a whopping 2 games over .500

it's still harder than hell to get to that magical 57%% w/juice

unless of course ya been willing to believe that "Prime Time" is just that..

 

[edludes]

The rules have changed so much to favor the offenses, that the great offenses can't b stopped. Rogers, manning ,Brady, Luck. If they have people who can catch and a good enough o line to give them time against their opponents then w the rules like they r , these guys can't b stopped. Roethlisberger, Flacco, Romo, they can do it most of the time now. I love to play unders, but that is very very difficult these days. I watched Indy take apart the Giants D on mon night and it was boring . Miami did almost everything right against gbay but could not stop Rogers.stuff is happening offensively that I've never seen before: 500 yds passing, no sacks, no intys.... By Ben roethlisber? Is he really the greatest of all time, or just playing at the right time? I wonder what some of the past greats would do with today's rules, because the comparisons r becoming irrelevant statistically .

 

[smurphy]

The rules have changed so much to favor the offenses, that the great offenses can't b stopped. Rogers, manning ,Brady, Luck. If they have people who can catch and a good enough o line to give them time against their opponents then w the rules like they r , these guys can't b stopped. Roethlisberger, Flacco, Romo, they can do it most of the time now. I love to play unders, but that is very very difficult these days. I watched Indy take apart the Giants D on mon night and it was boring . Miami did almost everything right against gbay but could not stop Rogers.stuff is happening offensively that I've never seen before: 500 yds passing, no sacks, no intys.... By Ben roethlisber? Is he really the greatest of all time, or just playing at the right time? I wonder what some of the past greats would do with today's rules, because the comparisons r becoming irrelevant statistically .

:iagree:

 

[edludes]

Here is the new weapon the books use to keep their losses from getting worse: slanting the juice against the wrong side. They get to a major number as a line on a certain game rises , and they slam the juice the other way. Since everyone knows the books r the sharpest of the sharp, they get suckered into thinking there's a huge winning angle they r missing, when there really is no hope for the losing side at all. The jets game at sd this season comes to mind. That game penciled out to nothing short of a rout, which it was, but was being touted as a sharp play all week because the juice made the jets a lot more expensive . The books use this highly slanted juice to fake out " line chasers" and to minimize their losses on some of these mismatches in the process.

 

[ldabdou]

Here is the new weapon the books use to keep their losses from getting worse: slanting the juice against the wrong side. They get to a major number as a line on a certain game rises , and they slam the juice the other way. Since everyone knows the books r the sharpest of the sharp, they get suckered into thinking there's a huge winning angle they r missing, when there really is no hope for the losing side at all. The jets game at sd this season comes to mind. That game penciled out to nothing short of a rout, which it was, but was being touted as a sharp play all week because the juice made the jets a lot more expensive . The books use this highly slanted juice to fake out " line chasers" and to minimize their losses on some of these mismatches in the process.

I totally agree with this and it has been going on for years...It also depends on what house you go with too. You can use that house whose doing it and shop and get better value elsewhere...

 

[green2240]

Here we go again

Same old script. Dog covers until the 4th and then a collapse

Over will probably hit too

 

[green2240]

Yep, more faves. What is that.....10 in a row?

 

[Old School]

Yep, more faves. What is that.....10 in a row?

not on Thurs night..

what are you referring to..

glad to look it up for you

 

[green2240]

not on Thurs night..

what are you referring to..

glad to look it up for you

I'm referring to the last 10 overall games in this shitty league

 

[Old School]

I'm referring to the last 10 overall games in this shitty league

a Fish cover would make a run of 6-0 to the betting Fav

to include 4-0 in the late games Sunday

Mon. night and here Thurs. Night.

the Sun early games were 4-3 to betting fav