Favre asks for outright release from GB!

3 Seconds

Fcuk Frist
Forum Member
Jan 14, 2004
6,706
16
0
Marlton, NJ
http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=3483521

This is about to get real interesting...

Minnesota here he comes! :0corn


HATTIESBURG, Miss -- Three days after a conference call with Green Bay Packers team officials on Tuesday in which quarterback Brett Favre emphatically expressed his desire to play in 2008, Favre on Friday formally asked for his contractual release from the Packers in a letter, sources close to Favre and the team said.

The letter was sent by Favre's agent, James "Bus" Cook, via overnight mail on Thursday and arrived at the Packers facility Friday morning.

Cook, on behalf of Favre, expressed a desire to have an amicable parting, as the Packers have been reluctant to embrace his return. Favre announced his retirement in early March.
During a conference call on Tuesday that included Packers general manager Ted Thompson, Packers coach Mike McCarthy, Favre and Cook, sources say that the quarterback stated emphatically that he wanted to play again.

Favre was reminded by the Packers' brass that it was in March when the quarterback said publicly and privately that he wasn't 100 percent committed to football, sources said. Favre acknowledged his state of mind at the time, but added that he never felt he was a 100 percent committed in March of previous years, either. Favre felt he had to make a decision to retire because the Packers were pressing him for an answer, a source said.

During the same conference call on Tuesday, neither Thompson nor McCarthy were openly receptive or enthused about Favre's desire to un-retire, the sources said, prompting Favre to direct Cook to request his release from the Packers. Favre has three years remaining on his contract for a total of $39 million. He currently is on the reserve-retired list.

Favre wants a mutual parting rather than having to force the Packers' hand by writing a letter to request his reinstatement to the active 80-man roster. Under league policy, the team would have to comply or release him.

Cook's letter did suggest that Favre's accomplishments for the franchise merited the team honoring his request to be released, also asking that the action be taken "with no strings attached." Favre does not want to be traded, sources said, because he wants the freedom of choice to play for any other franchise.

Favre has been in communication with McCarthy during the past month about his desire to play but until this week had not spoken with Thompson.

Neither Thompson nor McCarthy were available for comment on Friday.

Favre did not wish to speak publicly about his situation when approached while working out Friday morning at a local high school in Hattiesburg. He appeared to be in excellent physical condition and threw the ball with ease, even throwing a football 50 yards "on a rope" with high school receivers. He has been throwing and running with the team for more than a month.

Favre was relaxed and in a positive frame of mind, joking and telling stories about himself, former teammates and coaches. He planned to continue working out next week.
 
Last edited:

AR182

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 9, 2000
18,654
87
0
Scottsdale,AZ
i think it will be surprisng if he winds up with minny because i think the pack would ask him to not sign witrh any team in the same division that the pack is in..

i said in another post that i thought that he was a perfect fit for the ravens...& that is my guess where he wind up.
 

bleedingpurple

Registered User
Forum Member
Mar 23, 2008
22,447
264
83
52
Where it is real F ing COLD
The Packers on not just going to release Favre. They know some team will trade something for him. They wouldn't take the risk of having a team like the Vikes or Chicago sign him.
I don't know what to think of this situation.. I am not a Favre fan because I am die hard Viking fan, but I realize that he is great or was great. Still don't want him. I hope he gets blindsided by a big D - End.
 

AR182

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 9, 2000
18,654
87
0
Scottsdale,AZ
the packers statement...

the packers statement...

The Green Bay Packers are aware of the latest developments regarding Brett Favre.Brett earned and exercised the right to retire on his terms. We wanted him to return and welcomed him back on more than one occasion.

Brett's press conference and subsequent conversations in the following weeks illustrated his commitment to retirement.

The finality of his decision to retire was accepted by the organization. At that point, the Green Bay Packers made the commitment to move forward with our football team.

As a retired player, Brett has the option to apply for reinstatement with Commissioner Goodell. If that were to occur, he would become an active member of the Green Bay Packers. As always, the Packers will do what's right and in the best interest of the team.

As with all Packers greats, Brett's legacy will always be celebrated by our fans and the organization, regardless of any change in his personal intentions.
Brett and Deanna will always be a part of the Packers family.
 

Sun Tzu

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 10, 2003
6,197
9
0
Houston, Texas
The Packers are fools not to take him back. They know Aaron Rogers sucks - hell they drafted 2 QBs and tried to sing Culpepper and tried to trade for one of Tampa's 19 QBs. This is all about Thompson's ego and being pissed at Favre for chastising him for not going after Moss - or any other free agent that matter - notice how Green bay didnt go out and spend a penny of the additional cap space they got from Favre's retirement?

The reality is they cant really trade him. He has a 3year $39 million contract, and just about nobody has the cap room. So Favre's contract would have to be restructured...which he of course controls. He isnt getting traded anywhere he doesnt want to go. And Minnesota is the place he wants to go - a former coach and the one option where he can win. GB of course wont make that trade.

So really Green bay has only 3 options -1. take him back as a starter - which they wont do. 2. take him back as a back up - at $12 million/yr and a PR nightmare - not happening 3. release him.

So 3 is what will happen. Under league rules they cannot say "we will release you if you agree not to go to X team." They could have a "gentlemen's agreement" which Favre could break and GB couldnt do anything about it - heck they would get a huge fine to even admit doing it.

So yes i think he gets released and yes he would end up in Minnesota. Idiot Ted Thompson cancels the number retirement on opneing night, Minny wins in Lambeau and then goes to the Super Bowl.
 
Last edited:

hedgehog

Registered
Forum Member
Oct 30, 2003
32,897
708
113
50
TX
I think he is the starter in Green Bay week 1, they will kiss and make up, stay tuned:0corn
 

Big Daddy

Registered User
Forum Member
Apr 30, 2000
4,382
13
38
69
Wisconsin
Packers GM, coach say it?s time to move on
By CHRIS JENKINS, AP Sports Writer
17 minutes ago


GREEN BAY, Wis. (AP)?The Green Bay Packers? general manager and coach say they don?t plan to grant Brett Favre?s request for his release.

GM Ted Thompson and coach Mike McCarthy told The Associated Press on Saturday that the star quarterback was welcome to rejoin the team but would have to be a backup.

It was their first public comments since Favre demanded his release this week. Favre held a tearful news conference to announce his retirement March 6.

Thompson and McCarthy did not want to discuss a possible trade. Thompson said he had not received any inquiries as of Saturday morning.

_________________________________________

Yeah, right:rolleyes: Can you imagine the extra pressure on Rodgers with Favre looking over his shoulder as a backup? And could you imagine the fan's reactions seeing Favre sitting on the sidelines as much as they love him in Green Bay? It would be a PR nightmare. Of all the options the Packers have, to me that would be the absolute worst one.:shrug:
 

Dice34

Off parole
Forum Member
Dec 18, 2004
4,731
27
0
D.O.C.
the GB side are being hypocrrites by saying its time to move on yet not releasing favre....

Hes not good enough to start for your team and yet you fear him starting for another....

Your allegiance is to Aaron Rodgers who has proven nothing as opposed to Brett who has been the face of the franchise the last 15 years....

Brett owes them nothing and the pack should grant him his release....afterall its
"time to move on"
 

THE KOD

Registered
Forum Member
Nov 16, 2001
42,561
314
83
Victory Lane
the GB side are being hypocrrites by saying its time to move on yet not releasing favre....

Hes not good enough to start for your team and yet you fear him starting for another....

Your allegiance is to Aaron Rodgers who has proven nothing as opposed to Brett who has been the face of the franchise the last 15 years....

Brett owes them nothing and the pack should grant him his release....afterall its
"time to move on"
..............................................................

When you think about it there is no way in hell that the Packers could accept Favre returning and playing against them at the Packer Stadium.

How embarressing that would be.

Did they retire Favre's number yet ?
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top