FCC

Revolutionary Intentions

Registered
Forum Member
Sep 7, 2024
768
198
43
The following quotes from the FCC chair are unconstitutional, and he must be removed from office for the appearance of impropriety. I do not like the Jimmy Kimmel show, and obviously Jimmy Kimmel was being disingenuous when he said the assassin is a right winger. But, he has the right to say that. If his employer wants to remove him for lying overly, that’s no problem. Im personally glad he’s off air. Also, I’m sure part of the reason he got yanked is late night TV show model is dying. Regardless, the FCC chair simply cannot show any form of bias or share any opinion stifling speech as this is a direct assault on the first amendment. The mere appearance of impropriety in the form of pressure to limit Kimmel’s right to lie about the ideology of the shooter is absolutely unacceptable and he must be removed today.

“We can do this the easy way or the hard way. These companies can find ways to change conduct, frankly, on Kimmel … or there’s going to be additional work for the FCC ahead.”


“Disney needs to see some change here … it’s time for them to step up and say this, you know, garbage … isn’t something that we think serves the needs of our local communities.”

🇺🇸
 
  • Like
Reactions: DOGS THAT BARK

DOGS THAT BARK

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 13, 1999
19,501
176
63
Bowling Green Ky
The following quotes from the FCC chair are unconstitutional, and he must be removed from office for the appearance of impropriety. I do not like the Jimmy Kimmel show, and obviously Jimmy Kimmel was being disingenuous when he said the assassin is a right winger. But, he has the right to say that. If his employer wants to remove him for lying overly, that’s no problem. Im personally glad he’s off air. Also, I’m sure part of the reason he got yanked is late night TV show model is dying. Regardless, the FCC chair simply cannot show any form of bias or share any opinion stifling speech as this is a direct assault on the first amendment. The mere appearance of impropriety in the form of pressure to limit Kimmel’s right to lie about the ideology of the shooter is absolutely unacceptable and he must be removed today.

“We can do this the easy way or the hard way. These companies can find ways to change conduct, frankly, on Kimmel … or there’s going to be additional work for the FCC ahead.”


“Disney needs to see some change here … it’s time for them to step up and say this, you know, garbage … isn’t something that we think serves the needs of our local communities.”

🇺🇸

utah court documents filed Tuesday in connection with the murder charge against Robinson say his mother told investigators, “Over the last year or so, her son had become more political and had started to lean more to the left, becoming more pro gay and trans-rights oriented.”




Those documents also say that when Robinson was asked why he killed Kirk, “Robinson explained there is too much evil, and [Kirk] spreads too much hate.”

A day before those documents were filed, Kimmel, in his show’s opening monologue Monday, said, “The MAGA Gang desperately trying to characterize this kid who murdered Charlie Kirk as anything other than one of them and doing everything they can to score political points from it.”
 

Revolutionary Intentions

Registered
Forum Member
Sep 7, 2024
768
198
43
Yanking Kimmel in ABC/Disney’s call. He’s an entertainer, not a journalist. They own the show, he embarrassed them by telling a blatant lie, they pulled him. That’s not censorship, that’s a business decision. Same as any company firing an employee who goes too far in eyes of the employer.





FCC Chair Carr’s comments are a different ballgame. His first comments were unacceptable, what he’s saying in this article is far worse. Once a federal regulator says ‘we’re not done with the media ecosystem’ that’s a shot across the bow at actual press outlets. News media can and do lie, whether by framing, omission, or outright. That’s covered by the First Amendment. The government doesn’t get to decide what’s a lie and then punish or pressure outlets accordingly.

The danger is conflation: if people cheer when a regulator makes those comments because they didn’t like what Kimmel said, they don’t realize the next step is regulators leaning on CNN, Fox, NYT, or even small outlets. Once the precedent is set that “media ecosystem” is subject to political pruning, it’s a straight line to censorship.

This isnt new. Government officials in biden admin pressured social platforms during COVID; company execs later admitted it. That’s unacceptable. Establishment immediate didn’t run with that story, but they will run with this one. More division. Yay 🙄

Trump needs to condemn these comments immediately. I also have concerns about what Pam Bondi had to say about some hate speech nonsense yesterday. She needs to stop talking. In over her head. I saw that she got mansplained by both the deputy AG and Stephen Miller. I’d like her and the FCC chair out today.
 

Revolutionary Intentions

Registered
Forum Member
Sep 7, 2024
768
198
43
utah court documents filed Tuesday in connection with the murder charge against Robinson say his mother told investigators, “Over the last year or so, her son had become more political and had started to lean more to the left, becoming more pro gay and trans-rights oriented.”




Those documents also say that when Robinson was asked why he killed Kirk, “Robinson explained there is too much evil, and [Kirk] spreads too much hate.”

A day before those documents were filed, Kimmel, in his show’s opening monologue Monday, said, “The MAGA Gang desperately trying to characterize this kid who murdered Charlie Kirk as anything other than one of them and doing everything they can to score political points from it.”
Kimmel lied. There’s no question about it. And yet the FCC still has no right to stifle speech or even give the appearance of it. If ABC fires him, that’s cool. I’m actually all for that. I think he is a gas bag.
 

yyz

Under .500
Forum Member
Mar 16, 2000
43,226
2,206
113
On the course!
Kimmel lied. There’s no question about it. And yet the FCC still has no right to stifle speech or even give the appearance of it. If ABC fires him, that’s cool. I’m actually all for that. I think he is a gas bag.

Did he, though?

What if you replace "other than" with "besides"?


"The MAGA Gang desperately trying to characterize this kid who murdered Charlie Kirk as anything other than one of them and doing everything they can to score political points from it.”

State media immediately led with "they killed Charlie Kirk" without knowing a single thing about this guy. (He hadn't even been identified yet)

I took his comments to mean MAGA can't accept that it could be one of them so they toss suspicion at everyone BUT themselves. I didn't feel he was accusing him of BEING MAGA.

I don't know his intent.




 

ageecee

Registered User
Forum Member
Aug 17, 1999
22,424
744
113
59
Louisiana
Kimmel lied. There’s no question about it. And yet the FCC still has no right to stifle speech or even give the appearance of it. If ABC fires him, that’s cool. I’m actually all for that. I think he is a gas bag.



He's a leftist looney tune who hates Trump and what the Republican party stands for. He's a hack that's all he is.
 
  • Like
Reactions: oldmansrt

Revolutionary Intentions

Registered
Forum Member
Sep 7, 2024
768
198
43
Did he, though?

What if you replace "other than" with "besides"?


"The MAGA Gang desperately trying to characterize this kid who murdered Charlie Kirk as anything other than one of them and doing everything they can to score political points from it.”

State media immediately led with "they killed Charlie Kirk" without knowing a single thing about this guy. (He hadn't even been identified yet)

I took his comments to mean MAGA can't accept that it could be one of them so they toss suspicion at everyone BUT themselves. I didn't feel he was accusing him of BEING MAGA.

I don't know his intent.
He said this on Monday or Tuesday. We all knew exactly what was going on by then. Of course anyone with the brain the moment the shell casing engravings were leaked.
 
  • Like
Reactions: oldmansrt

Skulnik

Truth Teller
Forum Member
Mar 30, 2007
21,066
297
83
Jefferson City, Missouri
He said this on Monday or Tuesday. We all knew exactly what was going on by then. Of course anyone with the brain the moment the shell casing engravings were leaked.
6 Times Leftists Melting Down Over Jimmy Kimmel Were Happy To Deny Conservatives ‘Free Speech’
The Federalist ^ | 09/18/2025 | BRIANNA LYMAN




The left doesn’t really care about Kimmel or free speech, it’s just about exploiting a convenient storyline to keep their narrative of Trump-is-authoritarian alive.​




ABC News pulled Jimmy Kimmel off the air on Wednesday. Not for being painfully unfunny, and not even for having an opinion. No, Kimmel got yanked because he flat-out lied and claimed: “the MAGA gang desperately [is] trying to characterize this kid who murdered Charlie Kirk as anything other than one of them and doing everything they can to score political points from it.”

It was a pure lie. Following widespread criticism, Nextstar Media Group said its ABC affiliate stations would not run Kimmel’s show over the comments.


FCC commissioner Brendan Carr noted ABC could face repercussions, but he didn’t force ABC to do anything. ABC made the call on its own — whether to protect its bottom line or because it knew it would lose in court. Notably, FCC regulations prohibit news distortion or a hoax. A station’s broadcast violates the FCC’s rules if “the station licensee knew that the information was false” or if “broadcasting the false information directly causes substantial public harm…”

Nonetheless, the professional censorship class on the left has suddenly discovered the First Amendment.

Harry Sisson took to X to claim “We are witnessing the most brazen attack on free speech in modern American history. Elon, Trump, and MAGA said they were free speech warriors. It’s the exact opposite.”

Matt Yglesias wrote on an entire article about “MAGA’s scary clampdown on free speech.”


David French called Kimmel’s removal a “direct attack on free speech.”

Vox’s Zack Beauchamp wrote Kimmel’s removal is the “most brazen attack on free speech yet.”

But where was this passion for “free speech” when ABC canceled the hit sitcom “Roseanne” in 2018 after Roseanne Barr referred to former Obama aide Valerie Jarrett as the offspring of the “Muslim Brotherhood & Planet of the Apes.”

The left cheered the cancellation, with French posting: “Roseanne canceled. Who could have possibly foreseen that a toxic person would be so toxic?”


No handwringing about censorship then.

Where were the hysterics when President Donald Trump was deplatformed in 2021? The “Twitter Files” even revealed that Twitter employees acknowledged on internal channels that Trump’s tweets after January 6 did not violate any policies — yet they banned him anyway.

The left celebrated.

Yglesias reportedly had no problem with the silencing of free speech, posting “It’s kinda weird that deplatforming Trump just like completely worked with no visible downside whatsoever.”

French said it was an “actual exercise of liberty,” and called the suppression of free speech “appropriate.”

Vox’s Aja Romano reassured Americans that deplatforming Trump isn’t a free speech issue. Rather, it is “effective at rousting extremists from mainstream internet spaces. It’s not a violation of the First Amendment.”

When Megyn Kelly was fired by NBC in 2018 after Kelly questioned whether blackface Halloween costumes were always racist, The New Yorker’s Doreen St. Félix mocked her, writing: “But Kelly is shrewd in plenty of other ways. In the next phase of her career, perhaps she will use her firing to fashion herself into a martyr for the so-called suppression of free speech.”

No defenders of free expression, no cries about censorship, just applause.

And let’s not forget the Biden administration’s censorship machine, exposed in Missouri v. Biden — later known as Murthy v. Missouri. The administration and federal agencies coerced and colluded directly and indirectly with social media companies to censor things they didn’t like on a litany of topics, such as Hunter Biden’s laptop, election integrity, and Covid-19. In fact, Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg later admitted on The Joe Rogan Experience that Meta was complicit in the censorship.

Speaking of the Hunter Biden laptop, no one raised any alarms when conservatives were being locked out of their Twitter accounts for sharing the New York Post’s bombshell story. In fact, left-wing media outlets gave cover to Big Tech, with NPR framing their reporting on the censorship as Twitter and Facebook merely limiting “the reach of an article with unconfirmed claims” before couching that with a note that so-called “experts warn that social media platforms are full of misinformation and conspiracy theories.”

No one clutched the First Amendment when The Federalist’s John Daniel Davidson was locked out of his Twitter account for stating the obvious fact that then-U.S. Assistant Secretary for Health Rachel Levine is a man. It was near radio silence from the left when YouTube censored Sen. Rand Paul for disagreeing with the government about CDC guidance.

So why the sudden panic now when a private company makes a determination on its own to pull a host for spreading egregious lies (and possibly violating the law)?

Partially because it’s one of their own. But even more so because, as Barack Obama once said, never let a crisis go to waste. The left doesn’t really care about Kimmel or free speech. But by pretending that this is some unprecedented Trump crackdown, they get to smear Trump as a dictator or authoritarian to delegitimize his presidency. It’s not about defending free speech, it’s just about exploiting a convenient storyline to keep their narrative of Trump-is-authoritarian alive.
 
  • Like
Reactions: oldmansrt

Revolutionary Intentions

Registered
Forum Member
Sep 7, 2024
768
198
43
I don’t worry too much about what the left’s motives are on anything, but I am personally hyper concerned about FCC chair’s lack of familiarity with the first amendment. I was livid with Biden admin over first amendment violations related to Covid, and now livid after the recent commentary from Carr. His comments after Kimmel was suspended are bad enough, but that interview you shared from squawk box today is unreal. I still can’t imagine that anyone on either side of the political aisle would be OK with the FCC chair saying he’s not done with the media ecosystem.
 
Last edited:

bleedingpurple

Registered User
Forum Member
Mar 23, 2008
22,415
240
63
52
Where it is real F ing COLD
If I were Kimmel, I would be happy to be out of it, but it's not my gig. He has so many millions that he can just leave the public eye. Maybe he's one of those who likes the spotlight. I don't think what he said was that egregious. Didn't we just have a Fox News host just say something like "just kill them" in regards to the homeless who won't seek help? Didn't Trump mock a disabled reporter when he was running during his first term? I think both were much worse than what Kimmel said. SNL starts up again October 4th.. They better play nice or maybe they will have ramifications as well. I just don't like how this looks. If Kimmel doesn't want to leave the spotlight, he can start his own podcast I guess
 
  • Like
Reactions: oldmansrt

WhatsHisNuts

Woke
Forum Member
Aug 29, 2006
28,200
1,455
113
50
Earth
www.ffrf.org
During his Inauguration, Trump said he would be a champion for free speech. Then he got into office and started suing broadcasting companies. Then he appoints one of the Project 2025 authors to lead the FCC, and he starts making threats to the broadcasters. This is the result. The champion of free speech is anything but. He's using the power of his office to threaten those that oppose him. This is not what this country is supposed to be. It has ZERO to do with anything Kimmel said about Charlie Kirk or the kid from the MAGA family that killed him.
 

Revolutionary Intentions

Registered
Forum Member
Sep 7, 2024
768
198
43
During his Inauguration, Trump said he would be a champion for free speech. Then he got into office and started suing broadcasting companies. Then he appoints one of the Project 2025 authors to lead the FCC, and he starts making threats to the broadcasters. This is the result. The champion of free speech is anything but. He's using the power of his office to threaten those that oppose him. This is not what this country is supposed to be. It has ZERO to do with anything Kimmel said about Charlie Kirk or the kid from the MAGA family that killed him.

You are mistaken. The kid may have had a republican family, but obviously he was a left winger. Kimmel lied. If you’re pushing his same narrative, then you are lying.

The current administration's use of the FCC pressuring ABC to suspend is definitely wrong, but it isn't quite as evil and antithetical to the spirit of America as the previous administration's use of the FBI to silence and deplatform regular American citizens from social media over posts about Covid or other social issues of the time. Kimmel knew what he was doing and he forced his employer into a corner and is now paying the price, unlike old Aunty Jane who had the temerity to question the origins of a virus that shut down the world and lost her access to Facebook at the behest of the federal government. Also, if we're fighting for the right of social commentators to tell lies about a shooting death that shocked the world, I'm sure that Alex Jones would like a word. Left needs to be consistent with our outrage imo.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Skulnik and ageecee

ageecee

Registered User
Forum Member
Aug 17, 1999
22,424
744
113
59
Louisiana
You are mistaken. The kid may have had a republican family, but obviously he was a left winger. Kimmel lied. If you’re pushing his same narrative, then you are lying.

The current administration's use of the FCC pressuring ABC to suspend is definitely wrong, but it isn't quite as evil and antithetical to the spirit of America as the previous administration's use of the FBI to silence and deplatform regular American citizens from social media over posts about Covid or other social issues of the time. Kimmel knew what he was doing and he forced his employer into a corner and is now paying the price, unlike old Aunty Jane who had the temerity to question the origins of a virus that shut down the world and lost her access to Facebook at the behest of the federal government. Also, if we're fighting for the right of social commentators to tell lies about a shooting death that shocked the world, I'm sure that Alex Jones would like a word. Left needs to be consistent with our outrage imo.


That’s what Dems do they lie.
Nutsack lies
Kimmel lies

See the correlation
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top