film festival launched to counter michael moore

AR182

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 9, 2000
18,654
87
0
Scottsdale,AZ
this is interesting.......

By Paul Bond

Just as his "Fahrenheit 9/11" opens nationwide, several filmmakers are readying documentaries aimed at debunking Michael Moore, and a new film festival is being planned that will feature such works as well as other movies well to the right of Moore's films.

Scheduled Sept. 9-11 in Dallas, the American Film Renaissance, as the festival will be known, has just been announced by co-founder Jim Hubbard, who said it is bankrolled primarily by some "big-time conservative donors."

Hubbard currently is negotiating to show two films critical of Moore.

The first is "Michael Moore Hates America," made by newcomer Michael Wilson and funded partially by Brian Cartmell, who made a small fortune when he sold his Internet domain registration company, eNic, to Verisign. The feature film, made for $200,000 and featuring appearances from Penn Jillette and John Stossel, among others, is looking for a theatrical and DVD distribution deal.


The second is the bigger-budget effort "Michael & Me" that was made by talk-radio star and soon-to-be TV host Larry Elder. The 90-minute documentary takes on Moore's 2002 anti-gun documentary, "Bowling for Columbine," Elder said.

"My film is a defense of those who own guns and of the Second Amendment," said Elder, whose "The Larry Elder Show" from Warner Bros. Prods. starts Sept. 13 on CBS affiliates in most major markets.

Elder said that he borrows liberally from Moore, including a "Bowling"-like animated segment that has Elder interviewing an obviously tense Moore. "He's sweating and sweating to the point he's reed thin, then he pulls out a gun and shoots me."

Moore didn't agree to an interview for either Elder's movie or Wilson's. "I did ambush him at a book signing in Santa Monica, and that's in the film," Elder said. "I asked him how many times Americans used guns for defensive purposes. He had nothing. No blooming clue."

For Moore's part, he said he's familiar with the title "Michael Moore Hates America" but doubts the movie even exists, beyond the trailer that can be seen on the Internet.

"You're being duped by the kooky right," he said. "I've been waiting to see this movie. It sounds like great science fiction."

Moore said he hadn't heard of Elder's film "Michael & Me."

As for the festival, Hubbard said that about 10 films are confirmed, and he'll cap it at about two dozen. Film reviewer Michael Medved is a confirmed guest as is Lionel Chetwynd, whose Showtime movie "DC 9/11," starring Timothy Bottoms as President Bush, will be shown.

"I'm itching to show that anywhere I can," Chetwynd said. "Like with all cable films, you want to keep it out there as long as you can to get it in front of as wide an audience as possible."

Hubbard and wife, Ellen, both attorneys, co-founded the festival in the spirit of competition. Boycott efforts, like the one from the group MoveAmericaForward.org that is asking exhibitors not to show Moore's "Fahrenheit 9/11," "are for the weak," Hubbard said.

"We want everyone to see Michael Moore's film," he said. "We also want everyone to see 'Michael Moore Hates America.' Conservatives complain about institutional bias in Hollywood. They need to stop whining and get out there and produce."

"Documentaries," added filmmaker Wilson, "are not 'Lions of the Serengeti' anymore. In this politically charged climate, they're skewed to an agenda, be it Michael Moore's or mine."

Not all films screened at the American Film Renaissance will invoke Moore. Patrick Wright's documentary, "Is It True What They Say About Ann?" focuses on Ann Coulter, the Fox News pundit. It was recently screened at the Maryland Film Festival.

And the war on terror also is expected to be a dominant theme at the American Film Renaissance.

"Liberal Hollywood has basically ignored the subject," filmmaker Jason Apuzzo said. His entry to the festival is "Terminal Island" and stars his wife, Govindini Murty, with a cameo from Irvin Kershner, director of "The Empire Strikes Back" and "Never Say Never Again." Kershner, who Apuzzo is careful to note that he doesn't share the same politics as Apuzzo and Murty, nevertheless mentored the couple in the making of their film.

"Conservative messages don't have a chance in contemporary Hollywood," Apuzzo said. "But there's another side in Hollywood. We are small in numbers but passionate."

"Terminal Island" is a black-and-white feature film about a woman being stalked by a Muslim terrorist who is himself being stalked by a bounty hunter.

"When you shop a script like this around," said Murty, "studio execs say, 'Is this about Muslim terrorists? We don't want to touch it.' "

So why have a couple of lawyers from Texas created a film festival? "I've always been interested in the cultural and political messages in film," Jim Hubbard said. "To be frank, whenever there is such a message, it's liberal. For 40 years the left has had a near monopoly, and we're going to counter that."
 

MadJack

Administrator
Staff member
Forum Admin
Super Moderators
Channel Owner
Jul 13, 1999
106,021
2,295
113
71
home
glad to see you made it back here. what was the problem?

have the withdrawal symtoms subsided? :D
 

gardenweasel

el guapo
Forum Member
Jan 10, 2002
40,607
255
83
"the bunker"
goes to show ya`

goes to show ya`

that thanks to the media,moore is a major political player.....actually,so is howard stern.....there`s 2 media icons for you...

i think that come november,kerry ends up winning comfortably.....that`s my opinion.....but,not because of moore...


moore could give bush a little backlash impetus......you either like him and buy into his schtick or you don`t....i don`t believe there are many on the fence about moore...

i really hope that this doesn`t set a precedent for feature films being made in election years to be used as propaganda tools to influence the vote......

then networks with political agendas premiring political dramas and sitcoms...based on a particular political bent....political concert tours....sports celebrities selling their names for political advantage......it could get downright silly....starting to already...


and i have a question.....why do people put political bumper stickers on their cars?.......signs on their lawns?.....to antagonize their neighbors?....strangers who disagree?....to create controversy?.....

i`m curious....you hear so many people say that their vote is their own private matter....and others blatantly wearing their political heart on their sleeves.....like something on a sign or a bumper sticker will persuade strangers to their ideology....

it`s more likely to get one into a confrontation,imo....

just curious...
 
Last edited:

StevieD

Registered User
Forum Member
Jun 18, 2002
9,509
44
48
73
Boston
I do not put on politcal stickers but if I did I would put on a Bush sticker and cut people off and take up two places when I park to get people mad at him.
Why do you consider 911 propaganda? Have you seen it yet or have you been listening to that "liberal" media again. In my opinion if it is true it is not propaganda and if it wasn't true the neocons would have a better defense against it.
 

AR182

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 9, 2000
18,654
87
0
Scottsdale,AZ
madjack quote:" glad to see you made it back here. what was the problem?

have the withdrawal symtoms subsided?"


the relay between my computer to the site was blocked for some reason.( per my tech).

ain't no joke about the withdrawal symptoms. had the shakes not being able to tune into the site & read what my forum friends were talking about. the site is a good way for me to break up my work day.


gw quote:"i think that come november,kerry ends up winning comfortably.....that`s my opinion."

gw my friend, not going to happen.

bush has been getting pounded during the last few months over the iraq issue & kerry hasn't been able to gain on him.

this tells me that the american people don't have confidence in kerry.

imo moore's film. sterns comments are going to work against kerry.

i believe the american people do not want a liberal running our country post 9/11.

say what you want about clinton but he showed the dems how they could win the white house.

but instead of learning, they have fallen into the party of people like kennedy, daschle, & pelosi.

i think bush wins by at least 50 electoral votes, which is a considerably large margin.
 

gardenweasel

el guapo
Forum Member
Jan 10, 2002
40,607
255
83
"the bunker"
stevie

stevie

as i said,i`m not gonna put money in moore`s pockets by supporting his "i hate bush"fixation.....but,that`s me.....

you know moore didn`t really like bill clinton..by that i mean support him.....i kinda did...believe it or not....

but clinton wasn`t far enough to the left for moore...

i posted a few of moore`s half truths in another thread...i`m going by what i have read on the movie....and from what i understand,it`s basically an anti-bush bash....stretching the truth...throwing bombs("the fbi wasn`t in the loop whenthe saudi`s were flown out"....well,they were....and your hero richard clarke gave the go ahead)....

but.i`ll give moore credit....he`s doing what rush does...pandering to the extremist left...as rush does the right.....and he`s getting rich....

whether he`s smart or just fanatical is up for conjecture(more the latter than the former,imo)....that he is a shrewd business man is pure fact....
 

djv

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 4, 2000
13,817
17
0
GW you have it dead on. Money Money. These cats know how to milk the cow. Rush and Moore and even Ann Dickhead will never say it. But they laugh all the way to the bank. And whats really Sad. All three do a good job of dividing the country.
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top