First and next to last sentence ~
- Thread starter buddy
- Start date
So, as we all know, you're a hypocrite.
Doesnt bother you at all that the people who make the laws, are paid off by "Big Pharm".
Yours in Jesus F Christ,
yyz
:0008
Let?s not forget, his original source is labeled as ?quackery? and he?s bitching because a legitimate news source didn?t tell the world he?s on the board of Pfizer. The Pfizer website has a profile of him and everything. Hiding in plain site. Scandalous!!!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Does Pfizer make any mention of his (James C. Smith) close financial ties with Reuters?
I asked the wrong question.
I should have asked,
"Did Reuters disclose their financial ties with Pfizer?'
-------------------------------------------------------------
From the onset of the pandemic, social media giants, including Facebook, Twitter and YouTube, have flagged COVID-related posts the social media giants deem ?false or misleading.?
That?s not news ? most social media users are aware of the practice, especially amid recent headlines citing increased pressure from Congress and the White House to aggressively crack down on ?vaccine misinformation.?
But here?s a less-publicized fact some social media users ? and consumers of online news ? may not know: Reuters, owned by the $40 billion international multimedia company, Thomson Reuters Corporation, is also in the business of ?fact checking? social media posts.
Reuters publishes its fact-checking commentary online in a format designed to resemble new stories, which turn up in online searches.
Last week, Reuters announced a new collaboration with Twitter to ?more quickly provide credible information on the social networking site as part of an effort to fight the spread of misinformation.?
In February, Reuters announced a similar partnership with Facebook to ?fact check? social media posts.
However, when announcing its fact-checking partnerships with Facebook and Twitter, Reuters made no mention of this fact: The news organization has ties to Pfizer, World Economic Forum (WEF) and Trusted News Initiative (TNI), an industry collaboration of major news and global tech organizations whose stated mission is to ?combat spread of harmful vaccine disinformation.?
Reuters also failed to provide any criteria for how information would be defined as ?misinformation? and did not disclose the qualifications of the people responsible for determining fact versus false or misleading ?misinformation.?
Physician kicked off LinkedIn for calling out Reuters? ties to TNI, Pfizer, WEF
Dr. Robert Malone, a physician and inventor of mRNA vaccines and RNA drugs, said he thinks anyone reading Reuters ?fact check? articles about COVID-related content should know about, as Malone says, the obvious conflicts of interest.
I should have asked,
"Did Reuters disclose their financial ties with Pfizer?'
-------------------------------------------------------------
From the onset of the pandemic, social media giants, including Facebook, Twitter and YouTube, have flagged COVID-related posts the social media giants deem ?false or misleading.?
That?s not news ? most social media users are aware of the practice, especially amid recent headlines citing increased pressure from Congress and the White House to aggressively crack down on ?vaccine misinformation.?
But here?s a less-publicized fact some social media users ? and consumers of online news ? may not know: Reuters, owned by the $40 billion international multimedia company, Thomson Reuters Corporation, is also in the business of ?fact checking? social media posts.
Reuters publishes its fact-checking commentary online in a format designed to resemble new stories, which turn up in online searches.
Last week, Reuters announced a new collaboration with Twitter to ?more quickly provide credible information on the social networking site as part of an effort to fight the spread of misinformation.?
In February, Reuters announced a similar partnership with Facebook to ?fact check? social media posts.
However, when announcing its fact-checking partnerships with Facebook and Twitter, Reuters made no mention of this fact: The news organization has ties to Pfizer, World Economic Forum (WEF) and Trusted News Initiative (TNI), an industry collaboration of major news and global tech organizations whose stated mission is to ?combat spread of harmful vaccine disinformation.?
Reuters also failed to provide any criteria for how information would be defined as ?misinformation? and did not disclose the qualifications of the people responsible for determining fact versus false or misleading ?misinformation.?
Physician kicked off LinkedIn for calling out Reuters? ties to TNI, Pfizer, WEF
Dr. Robert Malone, a physician and inventor of mRNA vaccines and RNA drugs, said he thinks anyone reading Reuters ?fact check? articles about COVID-related content should know about, as Malone says, the obvious conflicts of interest.
Last edited:
Hey Buddy: FYI, when you use Dr Robert Malone to make your argument, you've lost. He's a proven QUACK.
https://apnews.com/article/coronavi...p-fact-check-a87b1044c6256968dcc33886a36c949f
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/covid-psychosis-theory-joe-rogan-b1989552.html
https://www.businessinsider.com/sci...vid-19-mass-formation-psychosis-claims-2022-1
https://www.politifact.com/article/2022/jan/06/who-robert-malone-joe-rogans-guest-was-vaccine-sci/
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/covid-psychosis-theory-joe-rogan-b1989552.html
https://www.businessinsider.com/sci...vid-19-mass-formation-psychosis-claims-2022-1
https://www.politifact.com/article/2022/jan/06/who-robert-malone-joe-rogans-guest-was-vaccine-sci/
