Football Betting Myths

Status
Not open for further replies.

The Judge

Pura Vida!
Forum Member
Aug 5, 2004
4,909
29
0
SJO
There is an article posted at The Greek which I consider to be an excellent take on some of the gambling myths that we see bandied about so frequently. I absolutely believe everything that is covered in this article:


Football Betting Myths
Given the massive popularity of the NFL, it's surprising that the sport is shrouded in so much betting misunderstanding and misconception.

Let's try to separate betting myth from reality:

Myth #1: Betting lines are created to beat the public.
Reality: With the exception of the Super Bowl, the public plays almost no role in the linemaking process. The betting line is created and adjusted to meet the opinion of professional gamblers because it is they, not the casual fan, who bets serious money on the game.

Myth #2: Betting lines get balanced action.
Reality: While the goal is to construct a betting line that is of equal attraction to both favorite and underdog players, it rarely works out that way. More typically, a third of the games on the NFL schedule will have an insignificant amount of betting to cause much of a concern, another third will have active but balanced betting and the remaining third will have mostly one-way action. Traditionally, how the house fares on these lopsided games, called "decisions," determines whether books win or lose.

Myth #3: Bookmakers have inside information that they use to establish "trap" games.
Reality: Nowadays, with nearly everyone having access to the Internet, it's not so much the information as how well that data is interpreted. Bookmakers still may occasionally receive information regarding injuries or weather changes before players, but thanks to technology, that advantage often can be measured in seconds. Many years ago, if a bookmaker found out some significant nugget of data, he might try to lure the bettor to the "wrong" side. Those days are gone as inside information has all but ceased to exist and there is no such thing as a "trap" game.

Myth #4: Bettors have the edge early in the season because oddsmakers and bookmakers need more time to assess the teams.
Reality: More hours are spent analyzing the opening week of the NFL season than any other is. A detailed, in-depth assessment of NFL teams begins more than a month before the opening kickoff. While it's true that teams often do not tip their hand during the preseason or against weak, non-divisional foes, players are in no better position to uncover this deception than are bookmakers. Historically, the first six weeks of the season have been very kind to bookmakers. That's probably not just luck.

Myth #5: Professional gamblers pick their spots, betting just a couple of games a weekend.
Reality: Actually, sophisticated gamblers bet a lot of games. Think of it this way: If you're a successful gambler, why risk serious money on just a few games where a freak play or an official's call can make you a loser? The wider the net is tossed, the less of a factor luck becomes in the outcome.

Myth #6: Wiseguys bet more on games they really like.
Reality: More than any misconception, this myth probably best illustrates the difference between how professionals and amateurs think. A professional gambler believes that if a game is worth betting, it's worth betting significantly. Professional bettors generally wager approximately the same amount on every game they play. The concept of a "best bet" is a media creation that is foreign to professional sports bettors. Professional gamblers believe all their bets are good ones; that's why they make them.

Myth #7: Bettors can win by concentrating on a specific conference, division or region.
Reality: Not likely. It's not enough to have one specific area of expertise because the NFL schedule demands that teams play half their games outside their own division. Knowing the strength of a team is worthless if you don't also know the strength of the opponent.

Myth #8: Statistical wagering trends are important.
Reality: Technical analysis may be popular but it's hardly meaningful. Professional bettors put little faith in the favorite/underdog, home/away pointspread analysis that so often is cited by gridiron "handicappers." It's just another method of backfitting dismissed as irrelevant by wiseguys.

Myth #9: It's never wise to bet on rumors
Reality: Oh, yes it is. For example, if a professional bettor hears a rumor that Peyton Manning has the flu and is too ill to play quarterback for the Colts, he'll quickly bet on Indianapolis' opponent. If the rumor is correct, the gambler has stolen the line on a game that's certain to change. If the rumor is false, then he's played Indianapolis' opponent at a fair price. Since most lines are accurate, the bettor takes little betting risk in chasing a rumor.
 

Scott4USC

Fight On!
Forum Member
Sep 11, 2002
5,410
18
38
44
Myth #1: SEC road game are the most hostile environments. Tough to play on the road in the SEC.
Reality: USC travelled across the country TWICE for their first game of the year, with 2 different QB's making their first career start, and USC won @Auburn 23-0, and @Arkansas 50-14.

:mj07: :mj07: :mj07: :mj07: :mj07: :mj07:
 

kosar

Centrist
Forum Member
Nov 27, 1999
11,112
55
0
ft myers, fl
Myth #1: SEC road game are the most hostile environments. Tough to play on the road in the SEC.
Reality: USC travelled across the country TWICE for their first game of the year, with 2 different QB's making their first career start, and USC won @Auburn 23-0, and @Arkansas 50-14.

:mj07: :mj07: :mj07: :mj07: :mj07: :mj07:





:topic: :mj11: :mj10:
 

blgstocks

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 4, 2005
3,181
12
0
So. Cal
You really should put scott on your ignore list Kosar, best thing ive ever done on this site. Only time I run across his ignorance is when other members quote him, and it is always ridiculous.

Why doesnt jack send him to trojanboy.com or some other fan site?
 

Scott4USC

Fight On!
Forum Member
Sep 11, 2002
5,410
18
38
44
My post was valid. SEC is touted as the most hostile environments. Someone might take that into account in their handicapping. But it simply is not true.

Although CAL was spooked with their NEW QB making 2nd career start on the road @TN. CAL got blown out. CAL is legit top 10 team. Tough to play across the country with new QB. Michigan travelled across country and lost @Oregen. Arkansa and AU lost @USC. Arkansas this year with FRESHMAN QB went to Auburn and dominated @AU.

Many people bet against USC playing @AU and @ARK and factored in USC traveling across nation and in hostile environment with NEW QB! They lost both times.

SEC does NOT have more hostile environments than other conf. SEC road games are not tougher.

If you don't like the betting tip, ignore it!
 
Last edited:

hedman

Paid Poster
Forum Member
Dec 8, 2004
2,292
140
0
SouthDakota
My post was valid. SEC is touted as the most hostile environments. Someone might take that into account in their handicapping. But it simply is not true.

Although CAL was spooked with their NEW QB making 2nd career start on the road @TN. CAL got blown out. CAL is legit top 10 team. Tough to play across the country with new QB. Michigan travelled across country and lost @Oregen. Arkansa and AU lost @USC. Arkansas this year with FRESHMAN QB went to Auburn and dominated @AU.

Many people bet against USC playing @AU and @ARK and factored in USC traveling across nation and in hostile environment with NEW QB! They lost both times.

SEC does NOT have more hostile environments than other conf. SEC road games are not tougher.

If you don't like the betting tip, ignore it!

Quoted so blgstocks can enjoy. Why ignore this. Your telling me you dont rubberneck and try to see the car accident, thats what Scooter is. He's like a car accident, you have to read it.
 

The Judge

Pura Vida!
Forum Member
Aug 5, 2004
4,909
29
0
SJO
:topic: :mj11: :mj10:
Thanks for the tip. Very relevant for a post focusing on NFL betting myths.
I knew that Scooter's post was bound to be off topic because that is the kind of guy that he is but I didn't know what he had posted because this is what I see:

This message is hidden because Scott4USC is on your ignore list.

Stay out of my threads Scott. I am pretty sure we went over this last season.
 
Last edited:

Scott4USC

Fight On!
Forum Member
Sep 11, 2002
5,410
18
38
44
It is very simple. The IGNORE option allows you to IGNORE me. So do it. IGNORE ME! :yup
 

blgstocks

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 4, 2005
3,181
12
0
So. Cal
Quoted so blgstocks can enjoy. Why ignore this. Your telling me you dont rubberneck and try to see the car accident, thats what Scooter is. He's like a car accident, you have to read it.

I used to enjoy reading the car wrecks, but unlike other car wrecks (dvlsu, sponge) scotts posts are so long and winded that it is just a total waste of time. I used to read him to be shocked at how biased and skewed his vew of the world is through SC glasses, but after reading that he thought refs were giving SC calls because they "knew" they blew the game w/ Texas i put him on ignore right after that.

Now I just ask Jack to ban him in every thread that Scott gets quoted in and I see his biased ignorance.
Scott your advice in handicapping a game is worthless. "Ra Ra SC is so great" is not good advice.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Bet on MyBookie
Top