Weasel:
Sat on a jury, huh. In that case, I will yield to your expertise. With your astounding insights into everything, what else shall we change, freedom of speech and assembly? due process? equal protection?
But God help us if we try to take the right to bear arms away, right? Typical republican hypocrite. Pick and choose what you want to change to fit your agenda.
You know, even assuming, several, and I do mean several, questionable verdicts, don't you think your being a little short sighted here? I mean, this is throwing the baby out with the bath water.
There are many defense verdicts in very valid plaintiffs case that go unannounced in the media. I'm sure they far outnumber the perceived frivolous awards that garner all sorts of media attention and are spun by the right wing media.
As I've indicated many times on this board, unless you are in the courtroom and hear the evidence, you cannot make a valid determination as to whether the verdict was right or wrong. I think many of you with agendas similar to weasels think there there are these evil jurors out there who travel around the country to give silly awards and verdicts.
Get real people, they are just like you and me. Normal, and in your case normal but impaired. Are some lawyers better than others, of course. Can rich people afford more expensive lawyers, obviously.
However, just because a lawyer is expensive does not necessarily make him good. He may be good in discovery and pre-trial stuff but crap in the courtroom. And vice versa.
You know whats tiresome weasel is hearing idiots like yourself makeing moronic statements in support of caps on awards. Granted that is the prevalent right wing theme which you and your ilk continue to spin in the right wing media.
The only "moronic or biased jury" you referenced appears to be the one you sat on wherein you garnered all of your expertise. No one is hiding behind the Constitution, prick. I'm merely defending it from your attack.
You see, f***wad, the Constitution guarantees you (yes even you) the right to a jury trial. Your anti-american republican brothers would like to take that away by "legislating" an amount an injured person can receive.
How come you clowns don't have trouble with jury verdicts that take lives away (death penalty) but don't believe a jury is capable of determing an amount to award an injured party? Could it be that jury's do return death penalties (primarily against minorities) and that fits with the republican party's racist agenda?
Wow. How insightful. By the way, based on the content of your posts, I completely and totally understand your "...not having a clue..." while sitting on a jury in a simple auto case.
By the way, dolt, I like your analogy about the fox in the henhouse. My personal favorite on election eve was the barbarians were at the gate. After Bush and the liberal supreme court stole the election, was now they are inside.
It has proven to be true. This murderer has done nothing but take care of his friends. The absolute most corrupt president this country has ever had.
Another point, I know rather disjointed, but brilliant, there are good doctors (Strangelove) and bad doctors (Freeze), there are good and bad in everything. How can you make that moronic statement that lawyers merely gouge there clients. That is silly. You are playing to the media on high profile awards. That aint reality.
My posts are not ideologically motivated nor biased. I speak from the heart, mind and middle. My posts are intelectually stimulating, well thought out, and reflect common sense reality rarely seen on a gambling website.
I am by far and away the most intelligent, forward thinking poster that has ever been a member of this website. I have done my utmost to provide a modicum of ideas for all of you who struggle with the elementary issues of the day in the hopes of helping you with your daily struggles.
Yet, I am constantly berated by neanderthals such as yourself who refuse to open your minds to civilized thoughts, ideas and concepts which will further our journey through space and advance humankind.
No, I read with astonishment posts by Blitz, Pro, Freeze, Dawg, Dogs, 65, Wilson, Majestic, Fletcher, Nosigar and others too numerous to mention that not only display primate like thinking but also exhibits a dangerous attack on the values they state they represent. They are the barbarians inside the gates of Rome. Georgia, that is.
Well, the journey goes on. I, like my heros Allen Dershowitz and Jerry Springer, will go on and try to educate the masses before its too late and this country turns into the 21st centurys version of Nazi Germany.
Eddie
Sat on a jury, huh. In that case, I will yield to your expertise. With your astounding insights into everything, what else shall we change, freedom of speech and assembly? due process? equal protection?
But God help us if we try to take the right to bear arms away, right? Typical republican hypocrite. Pick and choose what you want to change to fit your agenda.
You know, even assuming, several, and I do mean several, questionable verdicts, don't you think your being a little short sighted here? I mean, this is throwing the baby out with the bath water.
There are many defense verdicts in very valid plaintiffs case that go unannounced in the media. I'm sure they far outnumber the perceived frivolous awards that garner all sorts of media attention and are spun by the right wing media.
As I've indicated many times on this board, unless you are in the courtroom and hear the evidence, you cannot make a valid determination as to whether the verdict was right or wrong. I think many of you with agendas similar to weasels think there there are these evil jurors out there who travel around the country to give silly awards and verdicts.
Get real people, they are just like you and me. Normal, and in your case normal but impaired. Are some lawyers better than others, of course. Can rich people afford more expensive lawyers, obviously.
However, just because a lawyer is expensive does not necessarily make him good. He may be good in discovery and pre-trial stuff but crap in the courtroom. And vice versa.
You know whats tiresome weasel is hearing idiots like yourself makeing moronic statements in support of caps on awards. Granted that is the prevalent right wing theme which you and your ilk continue to spin in the right wing media.
The only "moronic or biased jury" you referenced appears to be the one you sat on wherein you garnered all of your expertise. No one is hiding behind the Constitution, prick. I'm merely defending it from your attack.
You see, f***wad, the Constitution guarantees you (yes even you) the right to a jury trial. Your anti-american republican brothers would like to take that away by "legislating" an amount an injured person can receive.
How come you clowns don't have trouble with jury verdicts that take lives away (death penalty) but don't believe a jury is capable of determing an amount to award an injured party? Could it be that jury's do return death penalties (primarily against minorities) and that fits with the republican party's racist agenda?
Wow. How insightful. By the way, based on the content of your posts, I completely and totally understand your "...not having a clue..." while sitting on a jury in a simple auto case.
By the way, dolt, I like your analogy about the fox in the henhouse. My personal favorite on election eve was the barbarians were at the gate. After Bush and the liberal supreme court stole the election, was now they are inside.
It has proven to be true. This murderer has done nothing but take care of his friends. The absolute most corrupt president this country has ever had.
Another point, I know rather disjointed, but brilliant, there are good doctors (Strangelove) and bad doctors (Freeze), there are good and bad in everything. How can you make that moronic statement that lawyers merely gouge there clients. That is silly. You are playing to the media on high profile awards. That aint reality.
My posts are not ideologically motivated nor biased. I speak from the heart, mind and middle. My posts are intelectually stimulating, well thought out, and reflect common sense reality rarely seen on a gambling website.
I am by far and away the most intelligent, forward thinking poster that has ever been a member of this website. I have done my utmost to provide a modicum of ideas for all of you who struggle with the elementary issues of the day in the hopes of helping you with your daily struggles.
Yet, I am constantly berated by neanderthals such as yourself who refuse to open your minds to civilized thoughts, ideas and concepts which will further our journey through space and advance humankind.
No, I read with astonishment posts by Blitz, Pro, Freeze, Dawg, Dogs, 65, Wilson, Majestic, Fletcher, Nosigar and others too numerous to mention that not only display primate like thinking but also exhibits a dangerous attack on the values they state they represent. They are the barbarians inside the gates of Rome. Georgia, that is.
Well, the journey goes on. I, like my heros Allen Dershowitz and Jerry Springer, will go on and try to educate the masses before its too late and this country turns into the 21st centurys version of Nazi Germany.
Eddie
