Ok, part of my point was incorrect...A.P. uncovered it, so you say - I believe you - but this is an ABC pickup and report, so that counts for something. And I would assume the Associated Press is pretty much looked at as an association of press, which we all know what you consider to be liberal leaning, right? Or, can I quote you on saying the A.P. is centered and not left leaning? Just curious...would be nice to know. A good point to move forward on, for reference. I don't know that all the other biggies ignored it, as you put it...maybe so. I'm guessing the righty ones did too, you didn't jump on that.
I think you meant alleged evidence...but then, your position is clear that the dude is guilty, because I guess you believe what you hear from ABC now, if it serves your agenda. Wait, The A.P....sorry. You brought up the library...not me. Just making a point. I seriously doubt the guy was being self-serving in his point that the general public should have open access to the Internet at the library, which is what most people have now in their own homes. I guess government should control the Internet for the public now? More government intervention and control? Interesting...no problem with you having the position, just want it to be clear.
Bad choice of saying you were defending Limbaugh...just incredulous that he was the example you would hold up as leftys being unfair to and comparing it to this. It's simply ridiculous...comparing these two things. Limbaugh, in this instance, is so far beyond realistic when you see what he did, and what he had previously found public fault with in other public figures. Every single person who went off on Limbaugh for what he did, and what his position was prior to being found out, is correct in doing so. I wouldn't be talking about him - as fun as it is - if you had not held him up as a media example.
I only care about Limbaugh, because he is a fraud. It bothers me that so many people believe in him, and base their opinions at least in part because of the things he says. I would of course care immeasurably more about the guy next door, who is ALLEGEDLY a vicious pedophile, and attempts to influence law. As we can all see yet again, you take the leap of faith to try to make your point seem more "right," that the person is now a vicious pedophile...and not just a person who allegedly frequents those kinds of Web sites. I think my judge/jury/executioner point is even more soundly made in your case...with this. I'm not defending what is alleged in this case, which you zip right by...just his right to have a fair trial.
Keep posting...you continue to make my points for me. Cheers!
