over Phil/TB 6 -125
under Ana/Chi 6 -131
Anaheim -150
Ducks need points bad and that means tight playoff hockey, Giguere/Khabib....didn't take under at Clbs 'cause I fear Vancouver will do their usual offensive outburst against this team.
yesterday--the SU pics went 2-1, +0.72 units
parlays 1-1, +0.25
under pics 21-6-1 in this "crunch time" since Olympic break
one losing day (it was a one unit loss) last nine
overall:
SU pics 91-77-3, +8.43 units
parlays 25-49, +18.88 units
--since I've resumed posting (for 57 days, forgot to update this yesterday). I was down like 12 units before
that......And, yes, I've always done better at parlays ---lotta practice due to a
history of sheer desperation and chalk betting! and season high for parlays was
36 units...time for another big winner, I say!
all flat bet 1 unit risk per pic (for example, a +135 pic would pay 1.35 units,
a -135 pic would pay 0.74 units).
no SU chalk over -170
Any comments? GOOD luck to everyone!
under Ana/Chi 6 -131
Anaheim -150
Ducks need points bad and that means tight playoff hockey, Giguere/Khabib....didn't take under at Clbs 'cause I fear Vancouver will do their usual offensive outburst against this team.
yesterday--the SU pics went 2-1, +0.72 units
parlays 1-1, +0.25
under pics 21-6-1 in this "crunch time" since Olympic break
one losing day (it was a one unit loss) last nine
overall:
SU pics 91-77-3, +8.43 units
parlays 25-49, +18.88 units
--since I've resumed posting (for 57 days, forgot to update this yesterday). I was down like 12 units before
that......And, yes, I've always done better at parlays ---lotta practice due to a
history of sheer desperation and chalk betting! and season high for parlays was
36 units...time for another big winner, I say!
all flat bet 1 unit risk per pic (for example, a +135 pic would pay 1.35 units,
a -135 pic would pay 0.74 units).
no SU chalk over -170
Any comments? GOOD luck to everyone!
