The SEC is a more complete conference from top to bottom hence why when you look at alot of these SOS over the years, the SEC is so high. It is because they play each other & that is tough enough. They don't need strong OOC games the way their conference is while the Pac 10 is not as strong from top to bottom.
From 2000 to present... USC has played the toughest schedule in CFB
- Thread starter Scott4USC
- Start date
Plus the site you linked is full of garbage. It is quite ridiculous to even sit here & try to factor SOS for decades past when these things are subjective & criteria gets changed all the time.
I try to reason with you but your little dick syndrome with USC is borderline mental insanity.
I try to reason with you but your little dick syndrome with USC is borderline mental insanity.
Go read mansa_musa post. Very well written and informative.
http://www.madjacksports.com/forum/showthread.php?s=&threadid=131076
http://www.madjacksports.com/forum/showthread.php?s=&threadid=131076
no matter what the hell this fat slob says, he will have to say somthing stupid, to try to convince himself that USC and the PAC 10 are the best. no matter who schedule what and what SOS is and who had a better conferance, my mom can beat up your mom, the chicken came first not the egg.that fact of the matter is that the SEC has produced 4 national champs in the last 12 years and Scott is all hissy fit about that. that shit is in writing and they have the trophys to prove it. you really think if the PAC 10 was that great, you would think they would be in some championship games. Pac 10 is a great conference, no doubt about that, but alot of people ie; writers, fans, coaches and even the bowl selection committee knows they are not that talentd. does that mean they will be that way forever, hell no, maybe now they can start to get a better reconginition w/ USC winning a piece of the prize. but from Virgin Scott's arguement that the pac 10 is the greatest thing ever invented is hilarious. I love opinions and all, but I think you need to get laid and get your mind off of it. USC could go 0-12, and Scott would still say they are the greats....'well if it werent for the grass on the field at California, USC would of won that game or if the fans were so drunk and would just shut of, maybe the USC players could of been more focused. The thing I don't get, is that if Scott4Homos is ripping on the voting system and all this BS, wouldn't you think twice about why they voted for USC than this year. doesn't make any sense at all. Scott, drink a case of beer, head out to the bars and pick up some pussy. stop hanging around Micahel Jackson and his little boys and get some fresh air....
Thanks for calling me a fat slob. Very nice of you. If you want to see a picture of me, get my e-mail from madjack.
I have "never" said the Pac 10 was the best conference. NEVER. You obviously have poor reading comprehension. Also, your post lacks any substance.
As for a kicker, I will share something about my personal life because it actually is somewhat connected to college football and you seem to offer me personal advice which is totally off topic and rude. I am currently dating a girl on the dance squad at UCLA. Yep, UCLA, USC rival. So that might give you a laugh. Does not matter really, because Pete Carroll has ruined the rivalry between USC and UCLA. So I have no problem dating a girl from rival college. I am not that hard core.
Just decided to share that because you constantly give me personal advice which is not needed/wanted. Now only post what is related to the topic and try and do it with some substance.
I have "never" said the Pac 10 was the best conference. NEVER. You obviously have poor reading comprehension. Also, your post lacks any substance.
As for a kicker, I will share something about my personal life because it actually is somewhat connected to college football and you seem to offer me personal advice which is totally off topic and rude. I am currently dating a girl on the dance squad at UCLA. Yep, UCLA, USC rival. So that might give you a laugh. Does not matter really, because Pete Carroll has ruined the rivalry between USC and UCLA. So I have no problem dating a girl from rival college. I am not that hard core.
Just decided to share that because you constantly give me personal advice which is not needed/wanted. Now only post what is related to the topic and try and do it with some substance.
Scotty, there are other SOS's out there here is an example. I was amazed to see zna and cal in the top 5. But just to illustrate my point about the west coast BS you posted. Somehow Washington's SOS went from #7 in your poll to #45 in this one
http://www.nationalchamps.net/2003/SOS/index.htm
http://www.nationalchamps.net/2003/SOS/index.htm
You see Scott, like I said, its not really that hard to find some POS website to support our opinions. (no offense war) The difference is, you wont find any SEC fans claiming the site as "proof" of anything. That would be a page out of YOUR playbook...
Stuman
Stuman
Are you guys dense?:shrug:
That link showed the "pre-season" SOS for all the teams. I enjoyed seeing it and I knew USC had a top 10 SOS before the year started. Too bad it did not hold up. Once again, the difference between that link and my link, is PRE-SEASON SOS vs ACTUAL SOS. BIG DIFFERENCE.
I am sorry, but you all made yourselves look foolish.
I sometimes question the intellect of everyone here who I interact with.
That link however proved/backed up my statement on how lucky LSU was to play in the Sugar Bowl. USC had a "pre-season" SOS of 9 and LSU was 48. Boy did LSU luck out with their OWN SOS and USC SOS. Wish USC had some of that LSU luck, nothing went USC way this year.
FIGHT ON!!!!!!!!!!
That link showed the "pre-season" SOS for all the teams. I enjoyed seeing it and I knew USC had a top 10 SOS before the year started. Too bad it did not hold up. Once again, the difference between that link and my link, is PRE-SEASON SOS vs ACTUAL SOS. BIG DIFFERENCE.
I am sorry, but you all made yourselves look foolish.
I sometimes question the intellect of everyone here who I interact with.
That link however proved/backed up my statement on how lucky LSU was to play in the Sugar Bowl. USC had a "pre-season" SOS of 9 and LSU was 48. Boy did LSU luck out with their OWN SOS and USC SOS. Wish USC had some of that LSU luck, nothing went USC way this year.
FIGHT ON!!!!!!!!!!
Yada yada let it go already.
LSU are the national champions & USC is nothing but a paper champion.
How ridiculous are you? If anything preseason SOS compared to the final SOS #'s just shows how off preseason SOS's were but of course you wouldn't say that as that would hamper your stupid obsession with USC.
LSU are the national champions & USC is nothing but a paper champion.
How ridiculous are you? If anything preseason SOS compared to the final SOS #'s just shows how off preseason SOS's were but of course you wouldn't say that as that would hamper your stupid obsession with USC.
LOL I can't believe that this is still going on.
PRO USC HUH???? God, I would hate to bring up an arguement about OJ being from USC he is probably innoncent right?
PRO USC HUH???? God, I would hate to bring up an arguement about OJ being from USC he is probably innoncent right?
OJ DID IT!!!
OJ DID IT!!!
Sorry I have less to offer when it comes to capping sports than most here, so I depend on help and opinions from others. Here's one example!!
I'll only add that the rules are set Pre season and everyone should know them, there is no fair way to change them in midstream or Post season!!
No alligiance to either team!!
http://www.papertrojans.bravehost.com/
Keep it Positive, Topdog!!
OJ DID IT!!!
Sorry I have less to offer when it comes to capping sports than most here, so I depend on help and opinions from others. Here's one example!!
I'll only add that the rules are set Pre season and everyone should know them, there is no fair way to change them in midstream or Post season!!
No alligiance to either team!!
http://www.papertrojans.bravehost.com/
Keep it Positive, Topdog!!
Scott4USC said:
Could LSU's "good luck" possibly be attributed to the fact that they play in a conference with teams who know how to finish strong, and USC's "bad luck" attributed to the fact that USC played a bunch of pushovers? (USC played 11 teams with 5 or more losses) Have you examined that angle yet?
Stuman
Scott4USC said:.
As for a kicker, I will share something about my personal life because it actually is somewhat connected to college football and you seem to offer me personal advice which is totally off topic and rude. I am currently dating a girl on the dance squad at UCLA. Yep, UCLA, USC rival. So that might give you a laugh. Does not matter really, because Pete Carroll has ruined the rivalry between USC and UCLA. So I have no problem dating a girl from rival college. I am not that hard core.
Which one is she?
