Global warming hoax

ChrryBlstr

Registered User
Forum Member
Feb 11, 2002
7,407
54
48
Hoosier country
Polar Bears Are Now Eating Dolphins in the Arctic

Polar Bears Are Now Eating Dolphins in the Arctic

:142smilie:142smilie:142smilie:142smilie:142smilie what a hoax it has been


http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/201...l-warming-and-polar-bears-will-fall-from-sky/

And in other parts of the world....

The good news: Polar bears, imperiled by climate change, appear to have found something new to eat.

The bad news: It's dolphins.

Scientists studying bears on the Arctic shores of Norway found several of the white-coated predators feasting on the remains of white-beaked dolphins, which appeared to have become trapped under the ice of a fjord.

"This is the first record of this species as polar bear prey," the team recounted in a study published in the scientific journal Polar Research. "White-beaked dolphins are frequent visitors to Svalbard waters in summer, but have not previously been reported this far north in early spring."

The discovery occurred in April 2014 at a site just below 80 degrees north latitude. Scientists took several photos of the bears with the remains of the dolphins. At least one of the bears was notably skinny, with his ribs visible through his fur; he had finished off one carcass and buried a second one to save for later, said Jon Aars, a biologist with the Norwegian Polar Institute and the lead author on the study. A return trip in July found the remains of seven more dolphins in the area.

While the discovery may provide some help for the bears, dolphins aren't likely to replace the seals that are a staple of their diet, he said.

"It's a large population of bears, and it's not going to be that all of the bears in Svalbard can feed on dolphins," Aars told VICE News. "But it could be significant for some individuals for sure."

The bears are struggling with the same problem that's bringing the dolphins to the nearly 80-degree latitudes where Aars and his colleagues conduct their surveys: a warming climate that's making it harder for the thousand-pound predators to get enough to eat. The presence of the dolphins in the fjord where the photos were taken is itself a bit of a fluke, he said.

"Before we saw this, there was almost no ice," Aars said. Then a cold snap in late March and early April caused new ice to form, and the ice blew into the fjord. The dolphins had only a small hole through which they could surface to breathe, allowing the bear to catch them when they did, he said.

The bear appeared to have finished off one dolphin and buried the remains of a second in the snow for later ? a common practice among some animals, but rare in polar bears, he said. Though the bear photographed in April was notably thin, other animals in the area were in better shape, he said.

Meanwhile, white-beaked dolphins ? which typically live in the Atlantic waters between Europe and Canada ? have been recorded ranging further northward. Around Svalbard, polar bears have been spotted feeding on the remains of dead sperm whales, which normally dwell in the North Atlantic, Andrew Derocher, a biologist who has studied polar bears for more than 30 years, told VICE News.

"What we're seeing is a lot more species that are normally found in lower latitudes drifting further and further north over time," said Derocher, a professor at Canada's University of Alberta. That's "a pretty common story" as global temperatures increase: Scientists have tracked northward shifts in the habitats of birds, butterflies, and other animals for some years.

And in the Arctic, which has warmed at more than double the rate of the rest of the globe, the disappearance of sea ice has created new habitat for other species, he said.

"They're not in their normal range, but of course they follow food," Derocher said. "And because there's no sea ice, they're happy to go into those areas. But the perils are that if the sea ice conditions change quickly, and they can ... they get trapped."

Meanwhile, polar bears do best when the sea surface is more than half-covered with ice, which they use as a platform to scoop up seals, Derocher said. But as ocean temperatures off Svalbard have gone up sharply since 1970, the amount of sea ice in the area has gone down, the Norwegian study notes. Meanwhile, the seals that make up the bulk of their diet live on the sea ice and feed in shallow waters near shore. That puts their populations under pressure, and leaves the bears in a bit of a bind.

"We say, 'OK, these white-beaked dolphins are moving northward, why don't the polar bears just move northward?' The problem is once you get north of Svalbard very much, you get into the deep, deep Arctic Ocean waters," Derocher said. "Those are 2,000 to 3,000 meters (6,500-10,000 feet) deep. "They're not going to be habitat for seals, if it's not habitat for seals, then it's not going to be good habitat for bears."

And the loss of sea ice is also making it more difficult for bears to reproduce, Aars said. Female polar bears traverse the ice to reach the islands off the coast in late fall, making dens there to give birth. If the ice doesn't form, the bears don't make it ? and scientists aren't sure yet whether they've found new places on the mainland, he said.

https://news.vice.com/article/polar-bears-are-now-eating-dolphins-in-the-arctic

Peace! :)
 

hedgehog

Registered
Forum Member
Oct 30, 2003
32,884
693
113
50
TX
When you liberals figure out its a hoax it will be too late, its all a money grab ie Al Gore and about power over you to make you think something that is nothing but and elaborate scheme of fiction.
 

Jabberwocky

Registered User
Forum Member
Mar 3, 2006
3,491
29
0
Jacksonville, FL
Hedgetard and Skulfuk have to be the last two idiots on the planet that believe global warming is a hoax propagated by Al Gore. The depths of their stupidity is staggering. To be the dumbest people in the Republican Party is quite an achievement.
 
  • Like
Reactions: WhatsHisNuts

Duff Miver

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 29, 2009
6,521
55
0
Right behind you
Hedgetard and Skulfuk have to be the last two idiots on the planet that believe global warming is a hoax propagated by Al Gore. The depths of their stupidity is staggering. To be the dumbest people in the Republican Party is quite an achievement.

For those two, being at the top of any list: Dumbest, Ugliest, Poorest, is an achievement.

I can see it now, Skulnutz is in the ninth grade.

At the end of the year, his mother asks: "How did your grades turn out?"

Skulnutz replies: "Perfect. Straight Fs, that means Fantastic. They even tole me I don't have to attend school any more after this year."

Skulnutz was 23 at the time.
 

THE KOD

Registered
Forum Member
Nov 16, 2001
42,553
305
83
Victory Lane
When you liberals figure out its a hoax it will be too late, its all a money grab ie Al Gore and about power over you to make you think something that is nothing but and elaborate scheme of fiction.

yeh when New York is flooded out you neo cons will go


oh shit ............ they were right


sad that it will take a major event for you to get it thru your thick skullniks
 

Skulnik

Truth Teller
Forum Member
Mar 30, 2007
21,204
475
83
Jefferson City, Missouri
For those two, being at the top of any list: Dumbest, Ugliest, Poorest, is an achievement.

I can see it now, Skulnutz is in the ninth grade.

At the end of the year, his mother asks: "How did your grades turn out?"

Skulnutz replies: "Perfect. Straight Fs, that means Fantastic. They even tole me I don't have to attend school any more after this year."

Skulnutz was 23 at the time.

Tole that to me again.

:00x13
 

Skulnik

Truth Teller
Forum Member
Mar 30, 2007
21,204
475
83
Jefferson City, Missouri
Hedgetard and Skulfuk have to be the last two idiots on the planet that believe global warming is a hoax propagated by Al Gore. The depths of their stupidity is staggering. To be the dumbest people in the Republican Party is quite an achievement.

Please use mouthwash when addressing me, you have Cock Breath.

TIA

:0008
 

Skulnik

Truth Teller
Forum Member
Mar 30, 2007
21,204
475
83
Jefferson City, Missouri
Don?t Panic! Arctic Ice Hits ?Record? Low!? Climate Depot Explains Arctic melting hype





'Current Arctic ice shifts are not 'proof' of man-made global warming, nor are they unusual, unprecedented or cause for alarm, according to multiple peer-reviewed studies, data analyses and experts'


By: Marc Morano - Climate DepotAugust 27, 2012 4:36 PM



Climate Depot Editorial

First off, Climate Depot extends congratulations to the global warming activists as they celebrate current Arctic ice conditions and try to convince the public that it is a significant event that is due to man-made global warming.

But now, after years of waiting, the Arctic sea ice extent has ? at least according to some monitoring sources (See: Update: NOAA Showing 28% More Ice Than The 2007 Minimum) ? dipped below the 2007 amount. Of course this is only since satellite monitoring of Arctic began in 1979, so we are in reality talking about 33 years of monitoring. [Update: Has the Arctic record been achieved yet? See Anthony Watts: ?The NSIDC product, the new and improved ?multi-sensor? MASIE product, shows no record low at ~ 4.7 million square kilometers?]

Is this Arctic ice event significant and does it prove man-made global warming claims? Will skeptics now recant and call for carbon taxes to control the weather?

No, no. And No. Global warming activists are clinging to Arctic ice shifts as their number one claim of scientific ?proof? as they seek to keep the man-made global warming movement alive.

Current Arctic ice shifts are not ?proof? of man-made global warming, nor are they unusual, unprecedented or cause for alarm, according to multiple peer-reviewed studies, data analyses and experts.

In December 2011, Climate Depot released the A-Z Climate Reality Check report, noting: ?The scientific reality is that on virtually every claim ? from A-Z ? the claims of the promoters of man-made climate fears are failing.? Since that report was issued and presented to the UN climate conference in Durban South Africa, the claims of man-made climate promoters have continued to fail on every issue from sea levels to polar bears to global temperatures to Mt. Kilimanjaro to extreme weather claims to hurricanes to tornadoes to Antarctic ice. The failure has been so complete that global warming activists and many in the media are now forced to point to any bad weather event as somehow ?proof? of man-made global warming.

Here is how the media is presenting the current Arctic ice conditions: AP?s Seth Borenstein: Scientists say critical ice in the Arctic Ocean melted to record low levels this overheated summer. ? The National Snow and Ice Data Center reported Monday that the extent of Arctic sea ice shrank to 1.58 million square miles and is likely to melt more in the coming weeks. That breaks the old record of 1.61 million square miles set in 2007. Figures are based on satellite records dating back to 1979. Data center scientist Ted Scambos says the melt can be blamed mostly on global warming from man-made emissions of greenhouse gases.

The New York Times Justin Gillis reports: ?The amount of sea ice in the Arctic has fallen to the lowest level on record, a confirmation of the drastic warming in the region and a likely harbinger of larger changes to come.? Gillis also posits that changes in the Arctic sea ice extent impact our weather. But other analyses refute that. See: No Correlation Between Arctic Ice And N. Hemisphere Winter Weather: ?Winter snowfall has been increasing for fifty years. The peak year for Arctic ice was the lowest year for winter snowfall? & Global Warming Causing Winters To Simultaneously Get Colder And Warmer

Could AP?s Borenstein and NYT?s Gillis be on to something unique in the annals of reporting?

First, some perspective on Arctic ice: See: Six Thousandths Of One Percent (0.006%) More Of The World?s Ice Melted This Summer ? ?At this rate it?ll take 166 years to see a 1% reduction. This is like taking a glass of ice from a frozen swimming pool. The number is so small that it is outside the statistical margins of certainty?

And the reduction was aided by a super storm this year. See: Did ?The Great Arctic Cyclone of 2012′ reduce sea ice?: ?Neither Borenstein nor NSIDC?s current announcement mentions the massive Arctic storm that broke up huge amounts of sea ice, making this new record low possible?? & See: Reduced sea ice extent due to storm? The ice loss was mainly in the Chukchi Sea, where the storm was. The storm brought warm water to the surface

Note how eerily similar all of this sounds to a November 2nd, 1922 article in the Washington Post article titled ?Arctic Ocean Getting Warm; Seals Vanish and Icebergs Melt?:? The Arctic ocean is warming up, icebergs are growing scarcer and in some places the seals are finding the water too hot, according to a report to the Commerce Department yesterday from Consul Ifft, at Bergen, Norway. Reports from fishermen, seal hunters and explorers, he declared, all point to a radical change in climate conditions and hitherto unheard-of temperatures in the Arctic zone?Great masses of ice have been replaced by moraines of earth and stones, the report continued, while at many points well known glaciers have entirely disappeared.?

But there more Arctic hype from yesteryear. See: The Arctic Con: Polar Meltdown Claims ? We Have heard them all before ? in the 1930s, 40s & 50s etc.

Here is a very small sampling of past Arctic ice scares when Arctic was in warm cycle:

1922: ?Extraordinary warmth in the Arctic during the last few years? ? Polar ice sheet to melt down? ? Scientists astonished by Arctic warming. Northern United States to become ?sub-tropical.?

1923 Shock News: ?Radical? Climate Change Melting Down The North Pole

1935: Russian Ship Sailed 500 Miles From The North Pole In Ice-Free Water catastrophic proportions and people living in lowlands along their shores would be inundated?temps in Arctic had increased 10 deg. F since 1900?an ?enormous? rise?

Flashback 1947 : International Agency Needed To Stop The Arctic Meltdown: Same story ? different millennium ? ?May 30 1947.-The possibility of a prodigious rise in the surface of ocean with resultant widespread inundation if Antarctic ice regions and the major Greenland icecap should reduce at same rate as present melting in Arctic??

Flashback 1947: ?Alarming? Rise In Arctic Temperatures To Melt Greenland And Flood The Coasts Posted on August 18, 2012 ? Ten degrees of warming in Arctic with CO2 at 320 PPM?

We?ve heard it all before! 1922 Tipping Point: Antarctic Ice Sheet Collapse Will Lead To Biblical Flood

July 4, 1907: Arctic Heat Record ? Hottest Place In Europe



Read more: http://www.climatedepot.com/2012/08...t-explains-arctic-melting-hype/#ixzz3wumYuzXF
 

Duff Miver

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 29, 2009
6,521
55
0
Right behind you
Don?t Panic! Arctic Ice Hits ?Record? Low!? Climate Depot Explains Arctic melting hype





'Current Arctic ice shifts are not 'proof' of man-made global warming, nor are they unusual, unprecedented or cause for alarm, according to multiple peer-reviewed studies, data analyses and experts'


By: Marc Morano - Climate DepotAugust 27, 2012 4:36 PM

Oh great. Skulnutz is now quoting Marc Morano, who has a degree in political science.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marc_Morano

Morano is a rightwing nutjob who knows absolutely nothign about weather or climate.

Why doesn't Skulnutz quote REAL Climate Scientists?

images
 

Duff Miver

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 29, 2009
6,521
55
0
Right behind you
And you take Al Gore at his word and his BANK ACCOUNT?

Pity Really

Nuff Said

You're still putting up the same stupid shit. Quoting non-scientists when the knowledge of competent climate scientists is readily available.

One question skulnutz:

How did you get so fucking stupid?
 

Duff Miver

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 29, 2009
6,521
55
0
Right behind you
I don't fucking know, how did you?

Sorry, skulnutz, but unlike you, I get my information from people who actually KNOW something by virtue of their education and experience. They have verified credentials and acceptance by others in their field of expertise. College professors, Nobel Prize laureates, authors, educators, leaders. I listen to proven experts.


You don't do that. Your get your information from people who have no credentials, education or knowledge other than invented bullshit.

Maybe your Mama dropped you on your head when you were a baby.
 

THE KOD

Registered
Forum Member
Nov 16, 2001
42,553
305
83
Victory Lane
Sorry, skulnutz, but unlike you, I get my information from people who actually KNOW something by virtue of their education and experience. They have verified credentials and acceptance by others in their field of expertise. College professors, Nobel Prize laureates, authors, educators, leaders. I listen to proven experts.


You don't do that. Your get your information from people who have no credentials, education or knowledge other than invented bullshit.

Maybe your Mama dropped you on your head when you were a baby.

I think skul gets alot of his info from hedge

:scared
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top