Got to love a guy like this running for president

The Sponge

Registered User
Forum Member
Aug 24, 2006
17,263
97
0
What changes for these fellas? this sounds so similar to what is happening in Iraq but in McCains mind it is okay to stay this time.

CONFLICT IN THE BALKANS; Senator Who Saw War Up Close Doesn't Want to See Another


By MICHAEL WINES,
Published: May 5, 1993

Senator John S. McCain of Arizona is a conservative Republican and a war hero, a medal-spangled Navy pilot in Vietnam, the son and grandson of admirals in a family whose fighting lineage extends to George Washington's Continental Army. If politicians were thoroughbreds and bloodlines dictated performance, Mr. McCain might be the Secretariat of Senate militarists.

But anyone who wagered that Mr. McCain would favor United States intervention in Bosnia's war would lose his shirt. As President Clinton and lawmakers ponder the prospect of air strikes to counter Serbian aggression or the despatch of thousands of American troops to enforce a cease-fire, Mr. McCain has been sounding the Senate's most persistent and most urgent alarms on the question of involvement in a European war. Far Too Many Ifs

"We need to be honest about one central fact: We have no way to predict the size, length and casualties of a peacemaking effort," he told the Senate on April 21.

"If we find ourselves involved in a conflict in which American casualties mount, in which there is no end in sight, in which we take sides in a foreign civil war, in which American fighting men and women have great difficulty distinguishing between friend and foe, then I suggest that American support for military involvement would rapidly evaporate."

For now, Mr. McCain says, he prefers leaving the dirtiest work of peacemaking to those whom the war threatens most -- Europeans.

"I think it's time to hold their coats instead of them holding ours," he said in an interview.

Other senators have counseled against the use of United States force in Bosnia. But Mr. McCain's views draw special attention because of who he is: the Senator from Vietnam, who spent five and a half years in a prison camp after being blown out of the sky on a bombing run over Hanoi. It's Not Vietnam, He Says

Now, when he warns against what he calls the "tar baby" of Bosnia, the temptation is overwhelming to conclude that he is reliving the frustration of Vietnam.

Mr. McCain insists, a little wearily, that it isn't so. He says the 23 combat missions, the mid-air ejection that left him with two broken legs and a broken arm, the beatings by North Vietnamese guards, the solitary confinement, the efforts at resistance -- heroic, by some accounts -- are a closed chapter in his life.

"I never talk about Vietnam," he said last week during a talk in his Capitol Hill office. "I never relate stories about it. When I walked away from that place, it was over."

As for Bosnia, he said, there are better analogies.

"I think you can draw a parallel to the military challenge in Bosnia with what the Russians faced in Afghanistan," he said. "Even with ground forces and with overwhelming air superiority, they were unable to defeat a motivated, very capable enemy."

He nevertheless admits to seeing a fair likeness between Washington's initial response to Bosnia and its drift into Vietnam in the 1960's. Both began with a clamor to punish an enemy with air strikes; both may entail what he contends could be an open-ended commitment of troops and aircraft. The Admirals Before Him

"Right now," he said, "we seem to be flailing around, looking for a way to do this on the cheap. And there is no way to do this on the cheap."

How much of this caution is a reaction to Mr. McCain's Vietnam years, how much is passed on from ancestral fighting men and how much is a matter of intellect is speculation. But a background like Mr. McCain's cannot be ignored or forgotten.

His grandfather was in charge of all Pacific Ocean aircraft carriers during World War II; his father became commander of all United States forces in the Pacific during the Vietnam War.

There was never much doubt that John 3d would follow in their steps. And so, after an unimpressive stint at the United States Naval Academy, Ensign McCain began flying fighter jets off carrier decks. Eventually, the job took him to the aircraft carrier Forrestal and to Vietnam. 'Crown Prince' Is Downed

In October 1967, on his twenty-third bombing run, Mr. McCain's jet was struck by an antiaircraft missile over Hanoi. He bailed out into a lake and was taken, both legs and one arm broken, to a P.O.W. camp. Not until two months after the the war's end, in March 1973, was he released; by that time, at 37, he weighed about 100 pounds and his hair had turned white.
 

gjn23

Registered User
Forum Member
Mar 20, 2002
9,319
45
48
55
So. Cal
i stopped reading after 9 words

john mccain is NOT a conservative republican.....and neither is/was either bush
 

bryanz

Registered User
Forum Member
Aug 8, 2001
9,724
35
48
65
Syracuse ny, usa
i stopped reading after 9 words

john mccain is NOT a conservative republican.....and neither is/was either bush

McCain may not be a physical conservative but he is the leader of the republican party. He is all that the party has to offer. Other than the religious right wing conservative kooks, conservatives have no voice in either party. What have conservatives done for America the last 20yrs ? The same as their brothers on the left. The most important part of the conservative movement should be economic policy & personal freedom & liberty. The conservative movement in American politicts is a myth. So he's not a conservative; there will be self proclaimed conservatives voting for him though. William Buckley died this yr alone. A social conservative with out sound economic policy with spending restraints is just another anti America force against the American People. When it comes down to what matters to working American Families. What is the difference between conservative politicans and their liberal brothers on the left ? Nothing ! Bush may not be a conservatives, conservative but conservatives can't wash their hands of his bloody mess. Like it or not, conservatives are responsible for the last 2 terms of the destruction of America. Maybe if the antiquated social wing of the party steped aside, the important part of the party could get America back on track. Conservatives are supposed to be for limited government, all I have seen from the right is their willingness to infringe upon the rights of the American People & the People of the World. Conservatives won't accept responsibility for the Bush movement that they gave birth to. I guess it's a wash because they have nothing to take credit for. What ever happened to personal responsibility that conservatives give so much lip service to ? From the looks of the people in the media that call themselves conservative; a media that owns and runs our government from the left and right. The American People have work to do. We have so much to do, to take our Country back. Smoke screen issues on the left and right have us blinded as they take America away from the People out the back door. Why do WE get caught up in these lables ? Conservative/liberal /media/government = anti American People. We need to change the way We think. We have to make it Us against them. Divide and conquer, it's the oldest play in the book. Their winnig. It's our move. How do social conservatives explain a right wing evangelist Robertson endorsement of Giuliani ? Who are the leaders of the conservatiive movement ? Mitt Romney/joke. Pat Robertson & Rush Limbaugh ? Is there a conservative party in America ? It's all bull shit ! The media wanted nothing to do with physically conservative & foreign policy conservative candidates in either primary.
 
Last edited:

bryanz

Registered User
Forum Member
Aug 8, 2001
9,724
35
48
65
Syracuse ny, usa
Why waste time talking about conservatives and liberals ? Let us talk about who is for the American People and Who is against Us. The list is short on one side and endless on the other.
 

kosar

Centrist
Forum Member
Nov 27, 1999
11,112
55
0
ft myers, fl
NO Comments Here ?

Yeah, I have a comment.

It's beyond absurd that McCain was against that action that halted a genocide and did not cost us one soldiers life.

But then he strongly supports the Iraq fiasco and probably has his eyes firmly set on Iran.

I mean, wtf?

cocoon star said:
"If we find ourselves involved in a conflict in which American casualties mount, in which there is no end in sight, in which we take sides in a foreign civil war, in which American fighting men and women have great difficulty distinguishing between friend and foe, then I suggest that American support for military involvement would rapidly evaporate."

This is just like Cheney strongly, clearly, intelligently and cogently defending Bush 41 for not going to Baghdad in 1991, describing to a tee what would happen and what the consequences would likely be.

But somehow it became urgent to do just that in 2003 because of the imagined WMD and the non-existent ties to 9/11 and/or Al-Queda.
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top