Great to see that the NCAA Football diehards are active....

Scott4USC

Fight On!
Forum Member
Sep 11, 2002
5,410
18
38
44
SALTY DOG said:
so scooter, you agree the SEC is more popular,
the SEC fans are more passionate about football,
the SEC has more TV exposure,
the SEC gets more publicity,
the SEC has more tradition,
the SEC has been more dominate,
you agree to all this but you want me to try again?
Try again at what.... :mj07:

I never said SEC has been more dominate in the last 5+ years. That is what this argument is about. Let me refresh your memory. The SEC is NOT superior to the Pac 10. That means we are talking about the present. I said SEC may be more dominant in the last 20+ years or the history of CFB. But that is not the argument.


SALTY DOG said:
You spend fricken hours researching stats to spin
your weak ass conference....the rest of us have a
life....anyone can spend hours researching stats
to back ANY ARGUMENT....but there is no reward
in out stat-ing you because there are much more
important things in life than arguing with a rock
with time on it's hands....
why do you think the SEC is all of the above...
because it is a football conference...the Pac 10 is
not and never has been a football conference...
You don't get the credit because you don't
deserve it...you have to earn credibility....Your
team is hot...but be careful because all good things
must come to an end...what goes up must come
down...just ask the real powerhouses...OU, Miami,
Mich, Neb, Fla. ST, Fla, Tenn, Bama...once again,
if USC was in the SEC, Big 12, Big 10, or ACC...
a completely different story....

NO I do not spend hours on research. I gather info as I read along. For example if someone else researched the stats and I thought they were interesting, I copy and paste it in a microsoft word file. Majority of my posts on MJ's take me the most 5-10min.

The stats I post are FACTS. Not twisting or spinning anything. Facts are facts. I use facts to support my opinion. Maybe you don't understand it. I dunno. That is your problem.


but go ahead and
spend a couple of hours tonight going over your
material for the rebuttal......... :mj07:

You have provided NOTHING to rebuttle. :banghead:

You still have not supported your opinion about the SEC being superior to the Pac 10. :nooo:

I am sorry if you take offense to someone questioning your opinion. I did not think it would be so difficult for you to back it up. You also fail to counter argue the facts. You basically have accomplished NOTHING in this debate.
 

Trampled Underfoot

Registered
Forum Member
Feb 26, 2001
13,593
164
63
I dont know which I have a harder time understanding..... the amount of time people spend debating with Scott or the amount of time he spends researching meaninless stats with all those USC women around. Perhaps face to face its even easier for them to see through his bullshit? A thought to ponder.
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top