BOXLOCKS said:Scott
Most of the criticism you got from me and others in this thread had nothing to do with you picking McBride and the over.
I critisized you for playing McBride by KO at +565 when you could get McBride straight up at +545.
The fact that you played McBride straight and Tyson by decision proves you thought there was a chance this went the distance. Why risk the big payout if these guys held and tied up for 10 rounds. I have seen plenty of fights go the distance that had no chance.
Think about it, if there was an accidental headbutt and McBride won by technical decision, your KO prop would have lost while a straight bet would have cashed. And if these guys held and tied up for 10 rounds, the KO prop would have lost and the straight bet would have won.
You cashed your tickets and did very well, now quit being stubborn and admit it wasn't very smart to play McBride by KO at +565 when you could get him straight at +545.
.............................................................BOXLOCKS said:The kicker here is that McBride is much worse than Williams, he's slower, less skilled, and has a weaker chin. Tyson will have to twist both knees to lose this one.
gl bl
You cashed your tickets and did very well, now quit being stubborn and admit it wasn't very smart to play McBride by KO at +565 when you could get him straight at +545.
BOXLOCKS said:Btw, I will have continued success on the -400 plays, just like I will have continued success on the -300's, -200's, -110's and every other boxing wager I place.
yyz said:Box,
Why can't you be a man and admit you made an obvious mistake, its not that hard.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.