Help With Law school exam-Eddie Haskell

TIME TO MAKE $$$

Registered
Forum Member
Jul 24, 2001
11,493
0
0
50
TORONTO, CANADA
Here is my Torts take home exam Ed, was wondering if you could give me a few "pointers" so that I may get a head start since I am an old stupid "wannabe" lawyer that I inspire to become......

I hope you have some time on your hands... Thanks

The stupid, and confused,

TIME


TORTS I
Professor Young
Final Examination
Fall 2002

FACT PATTERN

Immediately after completing your first year of law school with great distinction, you arrive for the first day of your $1000 a week summer clerkship with the large and prestigious firm of Stodgy, Respectable & Loaded. Prominently displayed on your mahogany desk is your very first assignment.

To: Summer Clerk
From: Partner
Re: Kerans v. Porter Paint Co.

Hi, and welcome to the real world. Sorry I couldn't greet you in person, but I have to spend the whole week in depositions in Palm Beach. Please have your response to this assignment on my desk by Friday afternoon so I can review it over the weekend.

Our clients, Elizabeth and Bertram Kerans, have asked us to look into the remedies that may be available to them for damages they have suffered as a result of Elizabeth's being sexually harassed on the job. While we generally do not do plaintiffs work, the Kerans are good friends of Mr. Stodgy, and this case will be receiving our very best efforts. A number of associates will be working on various aspects of this case, so please confine your discussion to the possibility that we will be able to proceed against Porter Paint for its own negligence. More experienced associates will be looking into the possibility that the company may be vicariously liable for the torts of its employee, and a junior partner will be dealing with the complicated question of what impact the workers compensation bar may have on this claim. What we need from you is a thorough analysis of the direct negligence claim.

Elizabeth Kerans is 52 years old. She and her husband are relatively well to do. Elizabeth has not worked for wages since they were married in 1961, although she has worked as a volunteer for a variety of social and charitable causes. She decided to get a job after her husband made a snide comment about her not being able to handle a real job. She accepted a position as a decorating consultant in one of Porter Paint's retail paint stores. Her job was to offer advice on coordinating paint, wallpaper and flooring to customers purchasing materials at the paint store. The store was open from 10 a.m. to 9 p.m., and Elizabeth was to work from 1 p.m. to close four nights per week. Her immediate supervisor was Chester Smith. On her first day on the job, Sally Johnson, one of her co-workers, warned Elizabeth to be careful about getting stuck in the store alone with Chester. When Elizabeth asked what she meant, Sally replied "They don't call him Chester the Molester for nothing". Just then, Chester approached, and the women did not finish their conversation. The rest of the first day passed uneventfully.

On the second day, Sally worked from 10 a.m. to 4 p.m. While Sally was in the store, nothing unusual happened. Elizabeth has told us that as soon as Sally left, Chester started acting "weird" and she began to get nervous. When we asked her to be a little more specific, she said that Chester seemed to be staring at her and began standing so close to her that she became very uncomfortable. However, she did not say anything, because this was a new job and she wasn't sure that he was doing anything very wrong. Within an hour after Sally had left, Chester had managed to "accidentally" touch or brush against Elizabeth's breasts twice. Each time Elizabeth had jumped back, and Chester had said sarcastically "Oh, excuse me". Around 5:30, Chester had reached up under Elizabeth's dress. Elizabeth says that she was flabbergasted, and does not remember exactly how she reacted. Further, she has great difficulty remembering just what happened next. Her therapist says that she has blocked out parts of the incident, which is a common psychological reaction to extreme stress. At any rate, before Elizabeth ran screaming from the store sometime between 6 and 6:30, Chester had forced her to touch his genitalia, had exposed himself to her in a back room, and finally had appeared before her naked and asked her to watch him masturbate.
 

TIME TO MAKE $$$

Registered
Forum Member
Jul 24, 2001
11,493
0
0
50
TORONTO, CANADA
When Bertram asked why she was home so early, Elizabeth said that she had "quit". He made some joking remark about having been right, and Elizabeth burst into tears and locked herself in the bedroom. After that, the subject never came up because Bertram was afraid to raise it, thinking he had made a major faux pas. He did notice that Elizabeth seemed nervous and depressed and cried a lot, but he figured that was related to her stage of life. He was relieved when she started seeing a therapist several months after the incident. After months of therapy, Elizabeth was able to tell Bertram what had happened. He confronted Chester, who denied the whole thing. Bertram then went to Chester's immediate superior at Porter Paint, the regional vice-president, Mark Neff. Mr. Neff assured Bertram that the incident would be investigated, and if Chester was guilty he would be disciplined. When Bertram and Elizabeth did not hear anything from Porter Paint, they wrote a letter demanding to know what action had been taken. Neff replied that in the absence of corroborating evidence, the company was not inclined to sanction Chester.

Although over a year had passed, Bertram and Elizabeth decided to look into filing criminal charges against Chester. Officer Grant was very kind and promised to question Chester. Grant said that it sounded to him like Chester was guilty of Gross Sexual Imposition, a felony. When Grant pulled Chester in for questioning, Chester began to cry and rant. He admitted to molesting Elizabeth, said that she was not the only one he had victimized, and said that he was a sick man and needed help rather than punishment. While Grant did not necessarily agree, before he could get an arrest warrant Chester had voluntarily committed himself to a psychiatric hospital. After Chester was locked up in the loony bin, Porter Paint sent a letter to the Kerans saying that they had fired Chester. Officer Grant came by to say that he was sorry, but he did not think he could make the criminal charges stick in light of Chester's insanity defense.

It was about this time that Bertram mentioned the situation to his old friend Stodgy. Stodgy put a team of attorneys on the case, and they quickly eliminated the obvious possibilities. Elizabeth has plenty of tort claims against Chester (battery, assault, maybe false imprisonment, intentional infliction of emotional distress, etc.). The statute of limitations has not run on those claims, and his insanity defense probably would not block the tort claims. Unfortunately, his psychiatric care has cost a small fortune and he is probably judgment proof even if we could get service in the loony bin. There is also the possibility that we could use state and federal civil rights statutes against Porter Paint. Title VII sex discrimination claims can be based upon sexual harassment, maintaining a hostile work environment, etc. Unfortunately, we found out about the situation after the statute of limitations on the statutory causes of action had already run. Therefore, if the Kerans are going to recover at all, they will have to pursue a negligence claim against Porter Paint.

We have filed a complaint against Porter Paint on behalf of the Kerans. In the course of discovery we have gathered the following information. At the time of the incident, Chester had been employed by Porter Paint for over twenty five years. He had worked his way up-from stock boy to store manager. Porter Paint has given us a copy of Chester's employment record. It has general notations regarding promotions and raises, but no information regarding any complaints about his work performance or conduct toward other employees except a copy of the Kerans' letter demanding to know what action had been taken and the letter announcing that Chester had been fired. Neff has testified on deposition that he was aware of one other complaint. A woman who worked as a decorator in Chester's store complained about two years before the Kerans incident that Chester had grabbed her breasts. Neff said that he didn't remember much about the incident, but had felt at the time that she was making a big deal over nothing. He thinks that he told Chester to knock it off and the problem was solved. The woman who made the complaint was Martha Ross.

We talked with Ms. Ross, and she remembers the incident differently. She says that she made repeated requests for help in getting Chester to leave her alone. She says that Neff's reaction was to tell her that "boys will be boys" and that "sometimes you have to go along to get along". She quit her job after Neff refused to discipline Chester or even transfer Ross to another store. She says that Chester had a reputation among the female employees for this kind of misconduct, but no one did anything about it because they were afraid to lose their jobs. She says that several women quit to get away from Chester. Neff admits that there was a fair amount of employee turnover at the paint store, but says that is common for minimum wage jobs. He does not recall anyone ever telling him that they were quitting to get away from Chester.

In addition to Ms. Ross, our investigators located Steve Jones, who was the store manager before Chester. He recalls an incident when he was store manager when one of his female employees complained that Chester, then a store clerk, had made sexual remarks and suggestions to her, and "accidentally" bumped into her repeatedly. Jones had referred the matter to Howard McKey, the vice-president who preceded Neff. McKey told Jones to take Chester to the red-light district and "get his rocks off" so he would leave the "girls in the store" alone. Jones had taken that response as a joke, an indication that the complaint was not to be taken seriously. He had not been told to reprimand Chester for his behavior, nor had he done so.

We also located McKey, who is now 84 years old. He retired in 1972. He says that Chester always liked to "fool around with the girls" and that he had several complaints about Chester while he was vice-president. He never tried to discipline Chester. He thought that the girls should have been flattered by the attention, and if they really found it offensive they could stay at home where they belonged. He doubts that any records would have been kept about those incidents, he certainly didn't keep any. He would guess that 5 or 6 different women complained about Chester over a five year period.

Your assignment is to discuss the merits of the Kerans' negligence case against Porter Paint, assuming that the facts are as stated above and that no further factual development is likely to occur prior to trial. Specifically:

1) Outline the basis of the negligence claim, stating whether we will be able to prove each necessary element. If there is more than one way to approach that issue, briefly discuss each approach and recommend which one(s) we should use.

2) Anticipate the defenses that Porter Paint will raise, and discuss how we should respond to each defense.

3) Evaluate the likelihood of success on the merits -- Can we win this case?
 

Eddie Haskell

Matt 02-12-11
Forum Member
Feb 13, 2001
4,595
41
0
26
Cincinnati
aclu.org
Yes.

Eddie, the succinct

(by the way, since I went to a night law school in northern kentucky and knew that I wouldn't get hired by any major lawfirms or corporations, grades didn't matter) my position was anything above a c was an overkill.

Seriously, though, the facts presented are meant to trick you into thinking this is a tort question. In reality it is a mix of contract law and real property with constituitional aspects. I think you will find your answer in the rule against perpetuities as well as in the case of Phalzgraf v. Long Island Railroad. Cardozza's dissent was erotic.

Where do I send you the bill,

Eddie, the teacher.
 
Last edited:

TIME TO MAKE $$$

Registered
Forum Member
Jul 24, 2001
11,493
0
0
50
TORONTO, CANADA
Ed,

I knew you were a good man, thanks for the tips.......

I have to hand this in on Monday and my first thoughts are to
establish a negligence claim, I must show duty, breach, causation and actual harm.


Will be working on this over the weekend and I shall post my answer on Sunday hopefully.



Again, all kidding aside thank you for your help.

I'll buy your a few :drinky: if I pass by your town.



Cheers



Time, the student.
 

TIME TO MAKE $$$

Registered
Forum Member
Jul 24, 2001
11,493
0
0
50
TORONTO, CANADA
Eddie Haskell said:
Yes.

Eddie, the succinct

(by the way, since I went to a night law school in northern kentucky and knew that I wouldn't get hired by any major lawfirms or corporations, grades didn't matter) my position was anything above a c was an overkill.

Seriously, though, the facts presented are meant to trick you into thinking this is a tort question. In reality it is a mix of contract law and real property with constituitional aspects. I think you will find your answer in the rule against perpetuities as well as in the case of Phalzgraf v. Long Island Railroad. Cardozza's dissent was erotic.

Where do I send you the bill,

Eddie, the teacher.


Ed,

who do you think your fooling?
:nono:

;)
 

taoist

The Sage
Forum Member
I beg to differ, TTM $$$....

I beg to differ, TTM $$$....

...i'd have to say old ed was pretty accurate in this quote. LOL ;)


Eddie Haskell said:
(...[since I] knew that I wouldn't get hired by any major lawfirms or corporations, grades didn't matter) my position was anything above a c was an overkill...



"I think you will find your answer in the rule against perpetuities as well as in the case of Phalzgraf v. Long Island Railroad. Cardozza's dissent was erotic." ...now that's a classic ed...you are a funny guy. :D
 

Eddie Haskell

Matt 02-12-11
Forum Member
Feb 13, 2001
4,595
41
0
26
Cincinnati
aclu.org
How Tao,

Since you obviously went to a better law school than I no matter where you went (not kidding) and you obviously have done much better than I in the legal profession (many of us law types strive to live in that legal hotbed of Tennessee) would you mind explaining for Time and I the rule against perpetuities? Never did quite grasp that one (although ironically, I had no problem with future interests and actually got the book award in property I and commercial paper). So there.

I remain,

Eddie Haskell
Attorney at Law and Screen Door Repair
 

fatdaddycool

Chi-TownHustler
Forum Member
Mar 26, 2001
13,742
287
83
61
Fort Worth TX usa
Hey Ed,
My screen has a hole in it from shootin beer cans through the kitchen window, how would I go about repairing that? Would I have to replace the entire screen frame and all or just duct tape it. And if you can shoot me an explanation of the rule of perpetuities also, as I have never truly understood it either, and now I am really lost if you are saying it applies here?
Also can you tell me the what the last nice deed you did was? You see I think you must be a charitable person, don't know why just something about ya. Why don't you come down to Texas, its huntin season and the fish are biting, sure would love to have ya for a visit......
FDC
 

Eddie Haskell

Matt 02-12-11
Forum Member
Feb 13, 2001
4,595
41
0
26
Cincinnati
aclu.org
Fat:

Your post shows what a sensible, intelligent guy you really are. Here I am shootin my yankee-ass mouth off about all the dumb billies from the lone star state and you go ahead and put my skinny white ass in its proper place. Instead of tackling that screen door project all by your little old lonesome, you do the absolute right thing and consult an expert on your current door dilema.

This week, and this week only, I'm having a special.... free will and trust with each screen door repair estimate.* just that damaged screen door off your double wide to the following address and I will send you, free of charge*,your very own will and trust along with my guaranteed written estimate for repair of that door of yours.

Send to, postage prepaid:

Edward Haskell, Esquire
P.O. Box 1111
Cincinnati, Ohio

Thanks for your business and support.

Eddie

*free will and trust to follow receipt of screen door and $500.00 non-refundable poatage and handling charge for written estimate of repair. Offer not valid in Canada. Make certified check or money order paybable to "cash" and accompany with screen door.
 

yyz

Under .500
Forum Member
Top Poster Of Month
Mar 16, 2000
44,674
2,648
113
On the course!
I just checked with the Ohio Bar Association........there is no Eddie Haskell registered there...........I am starting to think this is not his real name, fellas......be careful!
 

Eddie Haskell

Matt 02-12-11
Forum Member
Feb 13, 2001
4,595
41
0
26
Cincinnati
aclu.org
Okay, Y, you busted me. You Wisconsin whistle-blowin puke.

However, you will find that I am listed, in good standing mind you, with the Ohio State Screen Door Association.

Ed
 

yyz

Under .500
Forum Member
Top Poster Of Month
Mar 16, 2000
44,674
2,648
113
On the course!
Busted, again!

It is the Ohio Screen Door Fitters and Adjusters Association.

by the way......what guage do you recommend to allow ample air flow, yet prevent unwanted particles from entering a dwelling?
 

taoist

The Sage
Forum Member
Eddie Haskell said:
...would you mind explaining for Time and I the rule against perpetuities? Never did quite grasp that one....


...join the club ed, old boy. i seem to remember some mumbling about a life in being plus 21 years, but that's a rule of law that oliver holmes himself probably couldn't explain.... :shrug:

...you should stick around more, ed. you seem to provide plenty of humor to the general forum.... i know yyz, fdc and monk have missed bantering with you.

...good luck in the screen door products liability cases. ;)
 

Eddie Haskell

Matt 02-12-11
Forum Member
Feb 13, 2001
4,595
41
0
26
Cincinnati
aclu.org
Y

In response to your query, I don't want to get to technical, but pursuant to the 2002 OSDFAA Manual, to maintain ample air flow but prevent the expulsion of unwanted matter through the orafice, we set our gauges at what is known (in screen door repair circles parlance) as the sphinter setting. However, the older the door and the larger the opening, it is more difficult to ascertain whether the the materials sought to be expelled are gaseous or semi-solid (in some cases actually liquid). In such cases, the licensed, certified screen door repairers in the State of Ohio rely upon a device called the flatumeter.

I hope this explanation has cleared the air of any confusion or constipation.

Tao, I enjoy being here and very much enjoy the banter with those you mentioned and others. I post on a couple of other boards on occasion and find in the posters at this site to be the most intelligent, creative and humorous of all (despite there extreme right wing viewpoints). Time permitting, I will try to post more often when the voice of reason is needed. Gotta go, not sure if its mass or gas.

Eddie, the old
 

THE KOD

Registered
Forum Member
Nov 16, 2001
42,564
315
83
Victory Lane
Eddie

were you ever a walk on kicker for Toledo in the MAC by any chance ?

Get ready Jphga and dunclock .

If Haskell says that he was , you have some phone calls to make. !


Scott-Atlanta
 

Eddie Haskell

Matt 02-12-11
Forum Member
Feb 13, 2001
4,595
41
0
26
Cincinnati
aclu.org
No Scott:

And I get down on my knees, on my cold wooden floor every day and thank God (of my own understanding), that I have never been to the City of Toledo let alone matriculate from any so-called institution of higher education located in what I affectionately refer to all the "Cullman of the North".

I don't understand the implication of "walk on kicker' to moi?

Eddie, the confused
 

THE KOD

Registered
Forum Member
Nov 16, 2001
42,564
315
83
Victory Lane
Eddie Haskell said:
No Scott: And I get down on my knees, on my cold wooden floor every day

Eddie, the confused

it was a joke referring to another incident.

Eddie I have a question for you. Would you call yourself a betting man ?

Please respond as soon as possible its important.

Scott-Atlanta
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top