No what you got to love is song and dance on 3 simple questions with no answer.
Brantz whole premise is to make excuses without acknowledging answer.
So lets see how B and liberal can answer this one since he says O is so intelligent.
---If he is that intelligent- yet linked/associated himself with Criminals (Rezco) Radicals (the rev) terrorists(Ayres) and has denounced all as bad judgement or not the people he knew--
He is either
A: the most naive/gullible- total void of common sense or logic or judge of character
or
B: Is in fact as smart as they think and great judge of character- knowing he can convince his sheep
Which if true- would make them
A:the most naive/gullible- total void of common sense or logic or judge of character
Pretty straight forwad I'd say
Brantz whole premise is to make excuses without acknowledging answer.
So lets see how B and liberal can answer this one since he says O is so intelligent.
---If he is that intelligent- yet linked/associated himself with Criminals (Rezco) Radicals (the rev) terrorists(Ayres) and has denounced all as bad judgement or not the people he knew--
He is either
A: the most naive/gullible- total void of common sense or logic or judge of character
or
B: Is in fact as smart as they think and great judge of character- knowing he can convince his sheep
Which if true- would make them
A:the most naive/gullible- total void of common sense or logic or judge of character
Pretty straight forwad I'd say