Hokies will try to ?exorcise the demons? at Clemson

IE

Administrator
Forum Admin
Forum Member
Mar 15, 1999
95,440
223
63
At the end of practice Monday, Virginia Tech Coach Seth Greenberg said he put freshman Dorian Finney-Smith at the free throw line and told him if he made both free throws during a one-and-one situation, the workout would be over. If he missed, the Hokies would have to run.

Finney-Smith, who went 1 for 8 from the charity stripe in Virginia Tech?s overtime loss to Duke last Saturday, proceeded to miss two free throws in a row. Then Greenberg had freshman Robert Brown, who missed crucial free throws during a late-game collapse in a loss at Florida State last month, step to the line, and he too couldn?t make the front end of a one-and-one.

Finally, though, on his second attempt Brown hit one to end practice, but not before ?we had to run a few sprints,? sophomore Jarell Eddie said with a smile this week.

?It was kind of my way of having those guys exorcise the demons,? said Greenberg, whose team enters its final road game of the regular season at Clemson on Thursday night having lost three of its past four games in large part because of 10 missed free throws during crunch time during that time.

The reality is the Hokies were in position to be on a five-game winning streak right now, taking second-half leads on No. 22 Florida State, No. 24 Virginia and No. 4 Duke in recent weeks. Instead, though, Virginia Tech has withered down the stretch in those contests, compounding their season-long issue of pulling out close games.

The Hokies have now seen six of their past seven games, and 14 games overall this season, decided in overtime or by four points or less. But despite a 5-9 record in such games, Greenberg is starting to see the sort of growth he hoped for all year long.

?I think we?re playing good basketball and I think that we?ve played good basketball now probably for the last two and a half to three weeks,? he said. ?Now obviously we?re not where we want to be. We haven?t improved in the areas as quickly in terms of ACC play as I would have liked. I thought we made very good progress early and then I thought we really leveled off and maybe even took a step backwards and now it seems like we?re starting to move forward again.?

Thursday night represents Virginia Tech?s only chance to sweep an ACC foe this year after it pulled off a 67-65 win over Clemson at Cassell Coliseum last month. But the Hokies weren?t immune to late-game struggles in that contest either, as the Tigers had a chance to tie the score at the free throw line in the waning seconds after Virginia Tech took a 14-point lead with less than six minutes remaining in the second half.

But for a change, it was the Tigers who couldn?t make a clutch free throw and Virginia Tech watched a string of seven losses in eight games finally come to an end.

?They were desperate and we weren?t as good against pressure as we normally are,? Greenberg said of that tense finish. ?We usually attack pressure. We kind of had one foot in, one foot out and didn?t just go right through it like we normally would. . . . The biggest thing at the end of that game was we didn?t guard the ball well, and we?ve got to guard the ball consistently.?

The rematch should be another close one considering nine of the 11 games between Virginia Tech and Clemson since 2004 have been decided by five points or less. But the Hokies will also need to do a better job of keeping the Tigers off the glass this time even though senior forward Victor Davila is expected to miss his fifth straight game with a groin injury. Clemson finished with 22 offensive rebounds in last month?s game.

The Tigers, though, seem to have turned a corner recently with forward Milton Jennings, who missed the first meeting because of a suspension, back in the mix. The Tigers enter Thursday?s senior night with wins in four of their past five games, and suddenly have an outside shot at earning a bye in the first round of the ACC tournament despite an overall record of 15-13.

Then again, even though Virginia Tech hasn?t gotten over the hump much lately, it seems these Hokies are starting to believe their demons really could be a thing of the past heading into the final weeks of a tougher-than-expected season.

?I?ve been telling the guys this since we started losing these close games, ?We can make a run in the ACC tournament just because we?re a contender with all the teams,? ? Eddie said. ?We?re taking all the games down to the last second, so in the ACC tournament if we do a couple things differently than previous games, maybe we can get a couple of those wins at the last second.?
 

IE

Administrator
Forum Admin
Forum Member
Mar 15, 1999
95,440
223
63
Clemson at a glance:

23rd in scoring defense allowed (59.9 ppg)
43rd best in turnover margin (+2.5)
95th in blocked shots (4.0)|
235th in 3-point percentage (33.1%)
255th in scoring offense (64.6 ppg)
262nd in offensive rebounding

Clemson Frontcourt:

N.B.A. pros=1 possible overseas pro ?Devin Booker
Injuries=0



Depth is the name of the game for a Tiger frontcourt that although it lacks individual star power it does enjoy some measure of strength in numbers mix-n-match interchangeable parts kinda game. Leading the G.N.C. N.F.L. combine testing charge upfront is junior year forward/center Devin Booker (see: left). Devin goes 6`8? and a brutish 245 lbs. and that makes Devin a man-child of a physical load down on the low blocks. Devin gives you a team leading and improved 7.0 boards and 10.7 steady points on a sporting 45.8% from the floor and a team leading 94 FTA?s (70.2% on such) from the at the FT-line. Is Devin a great player? No, he is however a downright reliable low-post player right now with a sneaking shot at being a good one come next year. Booker is an explosive athlete and hoops runs in his blood as his brother (Trevor) balls for the Washington Bullets. Helping out upfront with Devin is Milton Jennings. Milt? is another junior year forward who stands in at 6`9? and tips the Toledo?s at 227 lbs. Milt?s is the highest ranked Clemson basketball recruit since 1998 and he has done some smart strength and condition re-sculpting work since his arrival 3 years ago. Milt? scraps his way to 9.8 points, 5.3 rebounds and a second best .9 blocks per game. Milt?s also tends to play better vs. bigger names, so it remains to be seen how much 4-10 A.c.c. Vah.Tech will do for his ego.

Standing a towering true-Center (see: right) sized 7`3? in height and 255 lbs. down in the pivot would be one #10, Catalin Baciu. Last year the Romanian born Catalin averaged 1.1 and 1.1 again (points and rebounds); and the joke around the A.c.c. was that he looked good in the Airport and nowhere else. This campaign Catalin is the leading frontcourt reserve for Coach Brad Brownell. Catalin (whose nickname is ?bobo? which is Romanian for rookie or freshman) is now getting you 4 and 2, while blocking a shot, and leading the team with nothing much beyond dunks, put-backs and bunnies at 58.8% from the field; although he does prefer a face-up-game and is said to possess a soft-touch in and around the rim. That said, even if the quad-lingual Catalin is and always will be limited as production goes on the offensive end in his final year of ball, he is a force to be reckoned with on the defensive end and a very large and in change match-up problem for the undersized and undermanned Vah.Tech frontline that is currently barely going three deep. Also contributing a few minutes per half are 6`6? 190 lb. K.J. McDaniels and 6`7? 225 lb. Brad Sullivan. K.J. is an exceptionally athletic freshman year wing who Lindy?s magazine compared favorable to our very own Deron Washington. K.J will dunk and he will dunk straight nasty on you if you let him to take it to the rack. Right now he is at least a year away from being a major contributor, although 3.7 points and a couple of boards in only 9.9 minutes of p.t. (playing time) tells you just how freaky this 6`10? wingspan of a guy can be. Sullivan like McDaniels is a rookie year combo-forward who turned down a buncha other big-name offers to attend Clemson. Sullivan?s defense is ahead of his improving offense (37.2%) right now, and he is only netting 1.5 and cleaning the glass for 1.2 rebounds despite his springy 35.5? vertical leap. That?s just too low for a kid with fundamentally sound drop-steps, jump-hooks and left-handed range out to 18` who can simply jump right outta the gym. Such said, these two have the look and feel of a handsome forward combo come 2015. Wanna be Rap-artist Bryan Narcisse (unexpectedly) broke into the starting line-up 8 games ago and moved Bernard Sullivan to the bench in a non health related measure. The 6`6? 223 lb. high-light reel dunker had been getting you 2.6 and 2.3 off the Clemson pine, though if his asthma (and God Bless on that) has improved look out, this kid is a major vertical player who finishes well above the rim via his whopping 7` wingspan which is basically unheard of small-forward length.

Clemson Backcourt:

Association pros= 1 minor-league candidate??dre Young
Hurts=0



Leading the way in scoring despite his Middle Earth 5`8? Baggins D.N.A. inspired statue is one #11, Andre Young (no, not Dr. Dre either). On a points per foot basis I?d have to say that Mr. Young?s 13.3 ppg (points per game) and a team leading 87.7% from the FT-stripe is what you?d have to call rising to the occasion as pint-sized diminutive point-guards go. ?dre?s range is pretty much the gym, as he will jack one up from anywhere inside thereof. Clearly this kid does not want for confidence or self-trust. Quantifiably speaking ?dre goes 41.2% from the floor and 35.1% from 3-point land, so his shot selection does occasionally leave something to be desired; that said, he is a gunner and he could always get a job as a co-op at Remington this summer as he never met a shot that he did not like or that he was afraid to take. On the other hand, ?dre?s 2.6:1 assist to turnovers ratio is nothing short (pardon the pun) of exceptional as that?s packing some tight ass handles indeed. Be clear, this is ?dre?s team and this is his rock when he has the ball in his hands. ?dre has worked and worked and worked some more, I?d say his 302% increase in scoring since his debut year attests to how much this big-time fan-favorite has worked himself up. Good for ?dre, he sure is an entertaining sparkplug baller to watch and he sure gave Tech a fit upfront on long range pull-up J?s and off-the-dribble the last time we saw him just short of a full month ago.

Tanner Smith is a 6`5? 210 lb. senior 2-guard who is a reliable shooter who just like ?dre Young has improved his game each and every year. Tanner is second team wide in scoring with 11.2 ppg, 5.4 boards, and a team pacing 4 assists per game. That?s what I call a quality all-?round steady baller who does nothing to hurt you every bit as much as doing all the little things well in an attempt to help you. And that?s just ON-court folks. How ?bout his charity he founded at 12, yes, at twelve years of age! Tanner?s Totes a charitable organization which gifts tote-bags filled with things to help teens cope with long-term hospital stays around the country. All-A.c.c. academic team member as well. Can you say Citizenship or Civics award-winner? WOW! Just wow! God bless this kid ? the world can not have too many Tanner Smith?s.


Formerly) rounding out the starting backcourt trifecta of guards would be T.J. Sapp who is intent on initializing a combo-guard well rounded four year starting career at Clemson. T.J. is a right-sized guard who can make shots and has nice enough handles alike. Right now the rookie Fort Lauderdale native is getting you 4 points and 2 rebounds; although he appears to have hit the rookie wall as he has zero points in 6 of his last 11 games. Not bad for a kid who leads the team in bench-press and is known for his fun-loving infectious personality or lockeroom tonic. Every team needs a chemistry based straw that stirs the drink, applied sports psych 1o1. That?s what a kid like T.J. is all about.

Receiving spot minutes off the bench (pun intended) is 6`2? 215 lb. freshman season Rod Hall. Rod is a strong all-state caliber wide receiver who gave up football to pursue a surprising career in hoops. Rod is already up to 4.1 ppg and conjures up an assist and a rebound alike as his minutes continue to grow. Ditto his whopping 36.5? vertical leap and his reputation for hardnosed in your face physical brand of man-to-man defense.


---Techsideline.com
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top