How Could The Republicans Win The White House Again??
- Thread starter IntenseOperator
- Start date
Ron Paul's the only way. He's the only American candidate in the race. The rest are Zionist tools, including the Democrats. The masses of Americans are so stupid they will believe that electing a woman or a black is progress when in fact it's just a milestone on the way to the US becoming a bankrupt, corrupt third world kleptocracy. If any Republican candidate but Paul is nominated, the Democrats will win. (If I'm wrong, then the only other Rep. who can beat the Dems is Romney, because of his looks.)
If Ron Paul just hangs in there, the tool candidates will depart one by one. No way Hilary or Obama can beat Ron Paul in an open debate before the American public.
If Ron Paul just hangs in there, the tool candidates will depart one by one. No way Hilary or Obama can beat Ron Paul in an open debate before the American public.
if you & anybody else think that paul is going to be any different than anybody else as far as the middle east is concerned or any other important matter...you are mistaken. a candidate can say anything he wants on the campaign trail but once he sits behind the desk & starts reading the different reports & such..nothing will change. the system won't let it.....
Paul has thrown a serious scare into the people who actually run the country. You can tell by the way the shills and frontmen at Fox alternately mock and ignore him. If he can breach this barrier, and it will be difficult, there's no telling what can happen.
I will agree that even as president, it would difficult for him, alone, to do all he'd like. But getting our troops out of the Middle East and cutting off our foreign aid to Israel and the other countries we pay to be nice to it - you'd be surprised what a strong appeal this has to Americans.
I haven't seen anything like the Ron Paul phenomenon in my lifetime. He's exposing the system for what it is, whether he wins or not. He did fairly well in Iowa, and should do better in New Hampshire.
I will agree that even as president, it would difficult for him, alone, to do all he'd like. But getting our troops out of the Middle East and cutting off our foreign aid to Israel and the other countries we pay to be nice to it - you'd be surprised what a strong appeal this has to Americans.
I haven't seen anything like the Ron Paul phenomenon in my lifetime. He's exposing the system for what it is, whether he wins or not. He did fairly well in Iowa, and should do better in New Hampshire.
after hundreds of yrs of great white male leadership, this graet country can't endure four yrs of a woman or a black man ?
We could endure lots of things. I'd rather do better than that. Ron Paul is better than someone whose qualification is being black or female.
are you against all blacks and women as possible presidential candidates in the future or just these two ? I could never vote for hilliary but I could vote for a woman. could you ? how about the right black man or black woman for president ?
I like ron paul, I could vote for him. you say that ron paul couldn't lose a open debate to hilliary or obama. how can you be so sure ? winning and losing a debate can be so subjective, are you sure you could tell who won ?
There might be an occasional exception. Ron Paul has talked about Walter Williams as a possible VP, and Williams is a smart guy, but on the whole, no, I wouldn't vote for a black.
As for women, some are sensible, but most are going to vote time after time for all kinds of restrictive laws in the name of safety or protecting the children or saving the wombats, and I prefer freedom. The government is not something that I look to for support or advice or protection, it's something I see as a threat to my personal wellbeing. It takes my money and threatens my freedom at every turn.
In my opinion, the founders had it right. Only White males with property should be allowed to vote. They are the segment of the population in which whatever political wisdom is out there resides.
I thought one had to be born in this country and be a citizen to run for president, how can ron paul be the only american in the race ?
are you trying to tell me that you would prefer to live in a country with only white men ? You are in the wrong place. whats in it for the rest, if they can't vote and own property ? I do agree with you, our gov can be a threat to our freedoms, and over step the bounds of our personal liberties.
you talk about freedom, what about freedom for all. where you from son ? what do you have against woman ? you like woman don't you ? what are you trying to hide, how old are you ?what are your hobbies ? what do you do for work ? why do you want to get in the way of americans, american dreams ? this is a great country, I'm not the smartest guy around and I do pretty good.. smart guy like you should clean up, this is the land of great opportunity. what do you have to cry about ? who's keeping you down ?
Exactly.
Thatz what i'm talkin' about, yeah boooey.:142smilie
Stanch your menses for a moment, Brian.
If at the cost of our lives this board had to pick more winners than losers over the course of a year, would you prefer that every member be given an equal voice, or that the top ten best pickers' selections be used?
Well, the future of the country is no less serious.
the guy has a problem with woman, I hate to think about how he gets satisfied . for the record I don't have a problem with the irish, as long as they don't drink. you people are like the indians can't control your booze. speaking of indians, if they didn't get all liquored up and give all their land away, the white man would have no land. that was the biggest welfare program in american history, paleface getting subsidized land form the indians.
