How long is Drudge going to perpetrate the lie about Obama leering at the girl?

[Trench]

I was refering to talk show hosts, as far as Wayne goes, I am not on a first name basis with anyone here, yet.

Please... call me Trench, Lumi.

 

[Lumi]

ok Trench

 

[Woodson]

Dude I love you but you have to understand humor.

c'mon.... you remind me of an AI I wrote for my thesis in college... (he's on my computer now)

 

[DOGS THAT BARK]

protect him from what? :shrug:

From his "supreme being" image they try to project.

As I said in other thread I'd feel he was a little odd if he didn't scope it out--

objective of post in thread was to shead a little light on accusation that Drudge was only one on this story.

I am much more concerned about O running our economy like he ran his own finances.

--and apoligizing to every country he visits and using the word "we".

So far every country is exploiting him to the hilt-
Russia got to consider him the best thing since sliced bread-


July 10, 2009
Our Foreign Policy Neophyte

By Charles Krauthammer

WASHINGTON -- The signing ceremony in Moscow was a grand affair. For Barack Obama, foreign policy neophyte and "reset" man, the arms reduction agreement had a Kissingerian air. A fine feather in his cap. And our president likes his plumage.
Unfortunately for the United States, the country Obama represents, the prospective treaty is useless at best, detrimental at worst.
Useless because the level of offensive nuclear weaponry, the subject of the U.S.-Russia "Joint Understanding," is an irrelevance. We could today terminate all such negotiations, invite the Russians to build as many warheads as they want, and profitably watch them spend themselves into penury, as did their Soviet predecessors, stockpiling weapons that do nothing more than, as Churchill put it, make the rubble bounce.
Obama says that his START will be a great boon, setting an example to enable us to better pressure North Korea and Iran to give up their nuclear programs. That a man of Obama's intelligence can believe such nonsense is beyond comprehension. There is not a shred of evidence that cuts by the great powers -- the INF treaty, START I, the Treaty of Moscow (2002) -- induced the curtailment of anyone's programs. Moammar Gaddafi gave up his nukes the week we pulled Saddam Hussein out of his spider hole. No treaty involved. The very notion that Kim Jong Il or Mahmoud Ahmadinejad will suddenly abjure nukes because of yet another U.S.-Russian treaty is comical.
The pursuit of such an offensive weapons treaty could nonetheless be detrimental to us. Why? Because Obama's hunger for a diplomatic success, such as it is, allowed the Russians to exact a price: linkage between offensive and defensive nuclear weapons.
This is important for Russia because of the huge American technological advantage in defensive weaponry. We can reliably shoot down an intercontinental ballistic missile. They cannot. And since defensive weaponry will be the decisive strategic factor of the 21st century, Russia has striven mightily for a quarter-century to halt its development. Gorbachev tried to swindle Reagan out of the Strategic Defense Initiative at Reykjavik in 1986. Reagan refused. As did his successors -- Bush I, Clinton, Bush II.
Obama, who seeks to banish nuclear weapons entirely, has little use for such prosaic contrivances. First, the Obama budget actually cuts spending on missile defense, at a time when federal spending is a riot of extravagance and trillion-dollar deficits. Then comes the "pause" (as Russia's president appreciatively noted) in the planned establishment of a missile shield in Eastern Europe. And now the "Joint Understanding" commits us to a new treaty that includes "a provision on the interrelationship of strategic offensive and strategic defensive arms." Obama further said that the East European missile shield "will be the subject of extensive negotiations" between the United States and Russia.
Obama doesn't even seem to understand the ramifications of this concession. Poland and the Czech Republic thought they were regaining their independence when they joined NATO under the protection of the United States. They now see that the shield negotiated with us and subsequently ratified by all of NATO is in limbo. Russia and America will first have to "come to terms" on the issue, explained President Dmitry Medvedev. This is precisely the kind of compromised sovereignty that Russia wants to impose on its ex-Soviet colonies -- and that U.S. presidents of both parties for the last 20 years have resisted.
Resistance, however, is not part of Obama's repertoire. Hence his eagerness for arcane negotiations over MIRV'd missiles, the perfect distraction from the major issue between the two countries: Vladimir Putin's unapologetic and relentless drive to restore Moscow's hegemony over the sovereign states that used to be Soviet satrapies.
That -- not nukes -- is the chief cause of the friction between the U.S. and Russia. You wouldn't know it to hear Obama in Moscow pledging to halt the "drift" in U.S.-Russian relations. Drift? The decline in relations came from Putin's desire to undo what he considers "the greatest geopolitical catastrophe" of the 20th century -- the collapse of the Soviet empire. Hence his squeezing Ukraine's energy supplies. His overt threats against Poland and the Czech Republic for daring to make sovereign agreements with the United States. And finally, less than a year ago, his invading a small neighbor, detaching and then effectively annexing two of Georgia's provinces to Mother Russia.
That's the cause of the collapse of our relations. Not drift, but aggression. Or, as the reset man referred to it with such delicacy in his Kremlin news conference: "our disagreements on Georgia's borders."
<SCRIPT type=text/javascript> checkTextResizerCookie('article_body'); </SCRIPT>

 

[The Sponge]

I am much more concerned about O running our economy like he ran his own finances.

Yet u never had those concerns about Bush and his one failed business after another :shrug: . You are so worried about the economy just like u were with Clinton and the :nono: . You have to be the biggest hypocrite on earth. It is actually kind of sad to be witnessing this pathetic show u call thoughts. I mean only a complete jackass wouldn't recognize what a complete hypocrite u are. Im starting to think that maybe u don't know what u post one day from the other. U are the poster boy for hypocrites as Palin is the poster girl for lying.

 

[bryanz]

From his "supreme being" image they try to project.

As I said in other thread I'd feel he was a little odd if he didn't scope it out--

objective of post in thread was to shead a little light on accusation that Drudge was only one on this story.

I am much more concerned about O running our economy like he ran his own finances.

--and apoligizing to every country he visits and using the word "we".

So far every country is exploiting him to the hilt-
Russia got to consider him the best thing since sliced bread-


July 10, 2009
Our Foreign Policy Neophyte

By Charles Krauthammer

WASHINGTON -- The signing ceremony in Moscow was a grand affair. For Barack Obama, foreign policy neophyte and "reset" man, the arms reduction agreement had a Kissingerian air. A fine feather in his cap. And our president likes his plumage.
Unfortunately for the United States, the country Obama represents, the prospective treaty is useless at best, detrimental at worst.
Useless because the level of offensive nuclear weaponry, the subject of the U.S.-Russia "Joint Understanding," is an irrelevance. We could today terminate all such negotiations, invite the Russians to build as many warheads as they want, and profitably watch them spend themselves into penury, as did their Soviet predecessors, stockpiling weapons that do nothing more than, as Churchill put it, make the rubble bounce.
Obama says that his START will be a great boon, setting an example to enable us to better pressure North Korea and Iran to give up their nuclear programs. That a man of Obama's intelligence can believe such nonsense is beyond comprehension. There is not a shred of evidence that cuts by the great powers -- the INF treaty, START I, the Treaty of Moscow (2002) -- induced the curtailment of anyone's programs. Moammar Gaddafi gave up his nukes the week we pulled Saddam Hussein out of his spider hole. No treaty involved. The very notion that Kim Jong Il or Mahmoud Ahmadinejad will suddenly abjure nukes because of yet another U.S.-Russian treaty is comical.
The pursuit of such an offensive weapons treaty could nonetheless be detrimental to us. Why? Because Obama's hunger for a diplomatic success, such as it is, allowed the Russians to exact a price: linkage between offensive and defensive nuclear weapons.
This is important for Russia because of the huge American technological advantage in defensive weaponry. We can reliably shoot down an intercontinental ballistic missile. They cannot. And since defensive weaponry will be the decisive strategic factor of the 21st century, Russia has striven mightily for a quarter-century to halt its development. Gorbachev tried to swindle Reagan out of the Strategic Defense Initiative at Reykjavik in 1986. Reagan refused. As did his successors -- Bush I, Clinton, Bush II.
Obama, who seeks to banish nuclear weapons entirely, has little use for such prosaic contrivances. First, the Obama budget actually cuts spending on missile defense, at a time when federal spending is a riot of extravagance and trillion-dollar deficits. Then comes the "pause" (as Russia's president appreciatively noted) in the planned establishment of a missile shield in Eastern Europe. And now the "Joint Understanding" commits us to a new treaty that includes "a provision on the interrelationship of strategic offensive and strategic defensive arms." Obama further said that the East European missile shield "will be the subject of extensive negotiations" between the United States and Russia.
Obama doesn't even seem to understand the ramifications of this concession. Poland and the Czech Republic thought they were regaining their independence when they joined NATO under the protection of the United States. They now see that the shield negotiated with us and subsequently ratified by all of NATO is in limbo. Russia and America will first have to "come to terms" on the issue, explained President Dmitry Medvedev. This is precisely the kind of compromised sovereignty that Russia wants to impose on its ex-Soviet colonies -- and that U.S. presidents of both parties for the last 20 years have resisted.
Resistance, however, is not part of Obama's repertoire. Hence his eagerness for arcane negotiations over MIRV'd missiles, the perfect distraction from the major issue between the two countries: Vladimir Putin's unapologetic and relentless drive to restore Moscow's hegemony over the sovereign states that used to be Soviet satrapies.
That -- not nukes -- is the chief cause of the friction between the U.S. and Russia. You wouldn't know it to hear Obama in Moscow pledging to halt the "drift" in U.S.-Russian relations. Drift? The decline in relations came from Putin's desire to undo what he considers "the greatest geopolitical catastrophe" of the 20th century -- the collapse of the Soviet empire. Hence his squeezing Ukraine's energy supplies. His overt threats against Poland and the Czech Republic for daring to make sovereign agreements with the United States. And finally, less than a year ago, his invading a small neighbor, detaching and then effectively annexing two of Georgia's provinces to Mother Russia.
That's the cause of the collapse of our relations. Not drift, but aggression. Or, as the reset man referred to it with such delicacy in his Kremlin news conference: "our disagreements on Georgia's borders."
<SCRIPT type=text/javascript> checkTextResizerCookie('article_body'); </SCRIPT>

The supreme being image that they try to project ???? Who is they????? From what I have seen , they are the extremist on the right, that need a touch of self esteem... Who talks about his supreme being image more than the right wing ? Even you... Most people that continue to project others over themselves usualy have some internal issues to deal with..... Kind of ironic , who takes on the slave mentality in this equation.... Obama's critics have unwittingly made him their master.... Think about it !`

 

[DOGS THAT BARK]

Yet u never had those concerns about Bush and his one failed business after another :shrug: . You are so worried about the economy just like u were with Clinton and the :nono: . You have to be the biggest hypocrite on earth. It is actually kind of sad to be witnessing this pathetic show u call thoughts. I mean only a complete jackass wouldn't recognize what a complete hypocrite u are. Im starting to think that maybe u don't know what u post one day from the other. U are the poster boy for hypocrites as Palin is the poster girl for lying.

GW didn't need politics as mode of income--he had more than he could spend pre politics

Gumby on other hand pre politics consisted of community organizer and acorn affiliate.

Most already aware of this spongie but from your post evidently you don't.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++

I told you before election if he got in he'd run gov like he did his own life.

I told you about his voting present and trying play both sides.

He can't vote present as president but he can flop and take both sides of issues.

I told you--he keep similiar associates
Look at his cabinet and czars and Chicago connections--hell bout half of em were tax evaders.

Not Washington as usual?--no lobbyist in his house?
--would you like a list of em just in his cabinet alone. Only diff is you got media added to the corruption and doing the pay to play angle also.

Why the huge spending programs without reading any of the bills.Wonder why stimulus isn't working--(1/3) 267 Billion of it is on welfare programs--how stimulating?

Hmm instead of me continueing list might be easier to let you speak--and anyone else that feels they may have answer--

Please list anything positive Gumby has accomplished--other than doubling your welfare.

 

[godsfavoritedog]

I'm no fan of Obama but this is such a non-issue to me even if he was checking out that girl. A (half) black man who appreciates a nice ass ... how is this shocking to anyone? Hell, I know I woulda been checking her out. More power to him!

 

[Chadman]

Funniest part is you have liberal media showing video that is inconclusive trying to protect him.

Inconclusive? Ok, I guess people will want to think what they want to think. I can ask this a different way, then. Do you think it's appropriate for Drudge to run this as the main story with "Pope Dead" headline treatment with 4 or so similar treatments of a snapshot that is proven to be "inconclusive" and calling it a "stimulus" situation? Someone who has young daughters himself? I mean, it's inconclusive, right?

 

[bryanz]

GW didn't need politics as mode of income--he had more than he could spend pre politics

Gumby on other hand pre politics consisted of community organizer and acorn affiliate.

Most already aware of this spongie but from your post evidently you don't.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++

I told you before election if he got in he'd run gov like he did his own life.

I told you about his voting present and trying play both sides.

He can't vote present as president but he can flop and take both sides of issues.

I told you--he keep similiar associates
Look at his cabinet and czars and Chicago connections--hell bout half of em were tax evaders.

Not Washington as usual?--no lobbyist in his house?
--would you like a list of em just in his cabinet alone. Only diff is you got media added to the corruption and doing the pay to play angle also.

Why the huge spending programs without reading any of the bills.Wonder why stimulus isn't working--(1/3) 267 Billion of it is on welfare programs--how stimulating?

Hmm instead of me continueing list might be easier to let you speak--and anyone else that feels they may have answer--

Please list anything positive Gumby has accomplished--other than doubling your welfare.

there was no media corruption in the last white house ?? ? see : NYT's/judy miller & the iraq invation...... scooter, cheney and the boys...... you still need to understand what a present vote is... I know it's hard...... and yes Obama did have debt, shocking in a bush/cheney economy... most did... we lived in a debt driven economy the last 8 yrs... all obama did was listen to bush....."keep spending " our leader told us... "the fundalmentals are srtong " ..... I know you still believe... I was 2 yrs ahead of you on that one.... look it up....over all I give this a (P) for pathetic....The same people that were @ the point of the bush economy are represented in the Obama economy... I tryed to point this out in that rolling stone piece that you scoffed at...yes it did cover cap & trade..... I feel your pain... This is just another case were left meets right... You didn't see the boogeyman under the bed then..... So why now ????

 

[shawn555]

GW didn't need politics as mode of income--he had more than he could spend pre politics

Gumby on other hand pre politics consisted of community organizer and acorn affiliate.

Most already aware of this spongie but from your post evidently you don't.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Yeah and that stopped him from running his presidency as a corrupt businessman how?

He used the presidency to help make his cronies make more money.

Halliburton and other companies were given no bid contracts and have made a mint using our troops as pawns.

And I do not see how Obama working with poor people in Chicago as a negative thing.

Would it be better if he was given everything on a silver platter throughout his life?

What the fuck did bush accomplish by himself before being elected governor of Texas?

A bunch of oil businesses that he ran into the ground and that were given to him by Saudis.

 

[DOGS THAT BARK]

Gee Spongie -for a minute I though you had some volunteers to help you with some positive accomplishments so far --guess not

Mr B on economy--and last 8 years--I'd be tickled pink if next 8 produced same employment-inflation-and national growth.

Evidently you already forgot--or "didn't get it" before comparisons on GW and Billybob--you didn't have anything to add then--and doubt you do now--just the yada yada gambit till next time
http://www.madjacksports.com/forum/showthread.php?t=343671&page=2&highlight=calculator

Seriously how could you expect anything other than what has occurred with the 3 amigos and a 60 seat dem house--you better hope the moderate dems defect from the liberal base if there is to be any "hope" at all.

but if they don't -are you prepared for the consequences

 

[bryanz]

Gee Spongie -for a minute I though you had some volunteers to help you with some positive accomplishments so far --guess not

Mr B on economy--and last 8 years--I'd be tickled pink if next 8 produced same employment-inflation-and national growth.

Evidently you already forgot--or "didn't get it" before comparisons on GW and Billybob--you didn't have anything to add then--and doubt you do now--just the yada yada gambit till next time
http://www.madjacksports.com/forum/showthread.php?t=343671&page=2&highlight=calculator

Seriously how could you expect anything other than what has occurred with the 3 amigos and a 60 seat dem house--you better hope the moderate dems defect from the liberal base if there is to be any "hope" at all.

but if they don't -are you prepared for the consequences

I 'm as prepared for the consequences and will do just fine... If I made it the last 8, I can make it anytime.... I don't know what you were talking about then and don't know, now ....... I never voted for clinton... I voted for your dumb boy bush the first time... smart guys that are way over my pay grade voted for him twice.... 911 happened on his watch... the American economy was brought to it's knees on his watch... I'm not a left partisan... I voted for your first god Reagan, twice.....all these losers that want to line up behinde him now, haven't a clue... including you.. I haven't voted for 5 democrats since 1980.... never voted for one for preident, until now... You don't understand where I come from... I not an Obama partizan... If I was, wouldn't have posted that rolling stone article..... You think anything in there is LIBERAL, RIGHT ??? I think the solution to our problem is : right extremist like yourself & left extremist have to put America First, and their party in the wind..... In everyday settings, I'm right of most..... here, someone has to bring you wackos a sense of reality.

 

[shawn555]

Gee Spongie -for a minute I though you had some volunteers to help you with some positive accomplishments so far --guess not

Mr B on economy--and last 8 years--I'd be tickled pink if next 8 produced same employment-inflation-and national growth.

Evidently you already forgot--or "didn't get it" before comparisons on GW and Billybob--you didn't have anything to add then--and doubt you do now--just the yada yada gambit till next time
http://www.madjacksports.com/forum/showthread.php?t=343671&page=2&highlight=calculator

Seriously how could you expect anything other than what has occurred with the 3 amigos and a 60 seat dem house--you better hope the moderate dems defect from the liberal base if there is to be any "hope" at all.

but if they don't -are you prepared for the consequences

First let me say the dems are pussies.

Second wtf did bush accomplish by this time in office?

And I do not count amount of brush cleared at his ranch in texas.

If obama keeps us safe until sept 12th, he will already be a better president than Bush.

If obama keeps us from starting a total lie of a war in Iraq he has accomplished more than Bush.

How many lives were lost under Bush, between 9/11 and Iraq? Obama will never be able to accomplish that.

How about the treatment of our wounded soldiers that came back from Iraq/Afghanistan under Bush's watch, and how many funerals did Bush attend, that he was responsible for?

I am not happy what obama has accomplished so far I wish he had the balls to be a dick like Bush and push his shit thru congress. But to keep with your non stop whining asking what he has accomplished so far is pointless.

He has been in office since January SIX months. I will give him one year before I begin to throw him under the bus.

 

[shawn555]

And Obama has improved the view of the USA in the rest of the world.

That is an accomplishment there isnt it?

Bush did nothing but take all the support we had after 9/11 and flush it down the toilet by thinking he was a cowboy and listening to all the vulcans an invading Iraq.

We had the perfect chance to rid the world of Al Qaeda but BUSH fucked that up.


Also Bush did not take office with the country in shambles like Obama did.

I find it funny that Bush runs this country into the ground over the last eight years to a point where it has never been. And the new guy comes in and all off a sudden the repubs have this new fiscal responsibility and its on the new guy to have it all fixed by now.


I can not think of a bigger failure than Bush.

 

[Tcas]

I really don't see anything wrong with O checking out her azz. O must be tormented with the fact that even though he is very funny looking, now, as president he could get just about any woman. And he is stuck with that grotesque creature who could play center for the Knicks.She is an embarrassment to the WH. Poor guy.

 

[hedgehog]

Obama was looking at the chicks ass, bottom line, he is the Supreme leader of the free world, he should act like it.

He has been seen drinking a beer at a basketball game, smokes cigarettes, looking at underage girls asses, whats next blowjobs in the oval office:shrug:

only positive I see here is at least he is not GAY.

 

[bryanz]

I really don't see anything wrong with O checking out her azz. O must be tormented with the fact that even though he is very funny looking, now, as president he could get just about any woman. And he is stuck with that grotesque creature who could play center for the Knicks.She is an embarrassment to the WH. Poor guy.

sheer brilliance.. is that all you got...diminutive men like you lust for woman like this....you know you want her....maybe you want her to do you ??? your not jerking off, are you ????

 

[Chadman]

Mission accomplished, Wayne - thread hijacked and turned into an economic discussion. Well done. My question still stands if you care to find it in the mire.

Hedge, not surprisingly, you seem to be the only person convinced he was checking out the girls ass, now coining the term as some kind of "truth."

There simply is no way anyone not trying to be critical of Obama that could look at that video and say what you just said. No way. You have zero objectivity, and remain a joke when it comes to rational discussion about anything you don't agree with.

Nice job getting the gay slam in there... it took a little work, but you did it.

 

[Chadman]

I see Drudge took down all the links as of today - I guess even he couldn't justify the bullshit for more than a day. His pattern would be to leave up a story or two with any kind of substance that would damage Obama in the lower links, but this one was even too much of a fake for him to continue, I guess.

But, mission accomplished. The smear tabloiding convinced Hedge, at least.