How long

Tenzing

Registered
Forum Member
Jun 14, 2002
274
0
0
56
Austin, Texas
.....Will it take the "centrists" and neo-Nazi America haters out there to hijack this thread, and post something along the lines of "Bush sucks" "Your facts are wrong, but no one cares coz my refutation is 'you need mental help'" "Your facts are wrong, but the site that I use as an example to refute you has contained within its' text the line 'these numbers are way wrong'" or "The gov't can run your 5-man business way better than you can"

I give them just over 2.4 hours til the first hijack post is written.
 

ImFeklhr

Raconteur
Forum Member
Oct 3, 2005
4,585
129
0
San Francisco
.....Will it take the "centrists" and neo-Nazi America haters out there to hijack this thread, and post something along the lines of "Bush sucks" "Your facts are wrong, but no one cares coz my refutation is 'you need mental help'" "Your facts are wrong, but the site that I use as an example to refute you has contained within its' text the line 'these numbers are way wrong'" or "The gov't can run your 5-man business way better than you can"

I give them just over 2.4 hours til the first hijack post is written.

Man, when the Neo-Nazis AND Bush haters unite. We be in some serious trouble. :scared :scared
 

Chadman

Realist
Forum Member
Apr 2, 2000
7,501
42
48
SW Missouri
Although I'm sure this will count as some sort of hijacking...what exactly was the point being made that would subsequently be hijacked? Just that "centrists" and neo-Nazi America haters would post in your thread?
 

The Sponge

Registered User
Forum Member
Aug 24, 2006
17,263
97
0
.....Will it take the "centrists" and neo-Nazi America haters out there to hijack this thread, and post something along the lines of "Bush sucks" "Your facts are wrong, but no one cares coz my refutation is 'you need mental help'" "Your facts are wrong, but the site that I use as an example to refute you has contained within its' text the line 'these numbers are way wrong'" or "The gov't can run your 5-man business way better than you can"

I give them just over 2.4 hours til the first hijack post is written.

I'll take a stab at this question. Clintons fault?
 

Chadman

Realist
Forum Member
Apr 2, 2000
7,501
42
48
SW Missouri
Again, just mildly curious. Are you just waiting for someone to post any kind of point in your thread, to attempt to discredit them in some way?

I confess, the point of this thread is above me. :shrug:
 

Eddie Haskell

Matt 02-12-11
Forum Member
Feb 13, 2001
4,595
41
0
26
Cincinnati
aclu.org
I'm not sure what this thread is about but, I'm sure thatTenzing's facts are wrong, he needs mental help and Bush sucks. I think that about covers it.

Eddie
 

JCDunkDogs

Registered User
Forum Member
Sep 5, 2002
956
5
0
L.A. Area
Has the thread been hijacked? To answer this question, first we must determine what is meant by "hijacking the thread?" Its difficult to tell. These words are vague and imprecise, and render the issue of who has hijacked the thread an open one. With a bit of analysis, however, maybe we can reason through this thread and figure out who, if anyone, has hijacked it.

It seems that the sole judge of who has hijacked the thread is the person who has started the thread, namely one, Tenzing. He has given us some guidance as to what may qualify as a "hijack" by supplying the words the hijacker might use, viz. "Bush Sucks." He has also speculated that the hijacker would probably act within 2.4 hours of the start of the thread at 12:43am Tuesday. With these clues, lets look at the posts, shall we?

There was only one response within the 2.4 hour window, and that was by ImFelkhr at 1:51am Tuesday. But ImFelkhr did not use the predicted "Bush Sucks" epithet, leaving the question open as to whether Tenzing consider this to be a true "hijack?" We can't be sure.

At 3:05am, the "hijack" that was predicted to occur within 2.4 hours had not yet happened. When would it occur? No one knew for sure.

At 9:04am Tuesday, Chad expressed some uncertainty as to the subject of the thread, which does tend to make the act of hijacking a thread difficult. How is one supposed to hijack a thread if one cannot determine what the thread is supposed to be about? Chad asked if hijacking meant that "centrists" or "neo-Nazi America haters" would post in the thread, but the question went unanswered by the thread-starter.

A few minutes later, Sponge took a chance by guessing with the words "Clinton's fault," which every madjacker will agree has hijacked many an thread here over the years. Here, Sponge may have been, as they say, "on to something," because Tenzing responded by demanding more specifics. Eagerly, Sponge made a follow-up guess of "Liberal media?" but this was met with silence from Tenzing, which may be seen as the proverbial warm trail growing cold.

Several posters throughout the day expressed the same bewilderment at the subject of the thread, until finally, at 8:02pm Tuesday, Mr. Haskell opined bluntly that "Bush sucks." Aha! The magic words! At last, can it be said that this thread has been well and truly hijacked?

And yet, the only madjacker who can answer this question with any degree of certainty remains silent.
 

Tenzing

Registered
Forum Member
Jun 14, 2002
274
0
0
56
Austin, Texas
nah

nah

Has the thread been hijacked? To answer this question, first we must determine what is meant by "hijacking the thread?" Its difficult to tell. These words are vague and imprecise, and render the issue of who has hijacked the thread an open one. With a bit of analysis, however, maybe we can reason through this thread and figure out who, if anyone, has hijacked it.

It seems that the sole judge of who has hijacked the thread is the person who has started the thread, namely one, Tenzing. He has given us some guidance as to what may qualify as a "hijack" by supplying the words the hijacker might use, viz. "Bush Sucks." He has also speculated that the hijacker would probably act within 2.4 hours of the start of the thread at 12:43am Tuesday. With these clues, lets look at the posts, shall we?

There was only one response within the 2.4 hour window, and that was by ImFelkhr at 1:51am Tuesday. But ImFelkhr did not use the predicted "Bush Sucks" epithet, leaving the question open as to whether Tenzing consider this to be a true "hijack?" We can't be sure.

At 3:05am, the "hijack" that was predicted to occur within 2.4 hours had not yet happened. When would it occur? No one knew for sure.

At 9:04am Tuesday, Chad expressed some uncertainty as to the subject of the thread, which does tend to make the act of hijacking a thread difficult. How is one supposed to hijack a thread if one cannot determine what the thread is supposed to be about? Chad asked if hijacking meant that "centrists" or "neo-Nazi America haters" would post in the thread, but the question went unanswered by the thread-starter.

A few minutes later, Sponge took a chance by guessing with the words "Clinton's fault," which every madjacker will agree has hijacked many an thread here over the years. Here, Sponge may have been, as they say, "on to something," because Tenzing responded by demanding more specifics. Eagerly, Sponge made a follow-up guess of "Liberal media?" but this was met with silence from Tenzing, which may be seen as the proverbial warm trail growing cold.

Several posters throughout the day expressed the same bewilderment at the subject of the thread, until finally, at 8:02pm Tuesday, Mr. Haskell opined bluntly that "Bush sucks." Aha! The magic words! At last, can it be said that this thread has been well and truly hijacked?

And yet, the only madjacker who can answer this question with any degree of certainty remains silent.

Just sleepy
 

Chadman

Realist
Forum Member
Apr 2, 2000
7,501
42
48
SW Missouri
I have become frustrated with the lack of response from "The Decider." I am starting to think he may be in over his head in this very obtuse, easily coordinated topic.

One thing that is definitely for should. The hijacker is from Saudi Arabia. :SIB
 

THE KOD

Registered
Forum Member
Nov 16, 2001
42,561
314
83
Victory Lane
Adolf_Hitler_walking_out_of_Brown_House_after_1930_elections.jpg
 

Kramer

Registered User
Forum Member
May 10, 2006
3,633
26
48
Billary is in deep do-do

:topic:

:mj11:

:mj22:

:mfpost

:00x32

:00x5
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top