How Many 5yr Olds Could you Fight?
- Thread starter comfortable1
- Start date
I got 22 but I think that's way too low and that the quiz discriminates based on age. I'm good for at least 100 and here's why.
My approach would be as follows:
I'd start in a corner about 6 feet from each wall. As the kids charge me, I grab them by the back of the head and smash their faces into my knee. I would then toss their limp bodies into the corner and off to the sides against the wall. This would prevent others from sneaking in behind me. When there's no more room in the corners, I use the next wave of busted up children to build a wall in front of me, high enough so that it would be hard for the kids to climb over but not so high that I couldn't smash them in the face as they try. I'm confident that I could easily create enough blood flow to make the floor surrounding my makeshift fort extremely slippery, making for poor footing, which combined with the already poor motor skills of the children, would help my cause greatly.
Now that I type this up, it seems 100 is a low number. I bet I could annihilate at least 150. I would only be limited by my stamina. Even though I don't smoke or drink and I'm in great physical condition, I am going to be 50 in the Spring and I have to think that fatigue would start to set in after about 15 minutes. Even then, it would be tough for five year olds to k.o. me no matter how many there were. First, as previously mentioned, they lack the strength and motor skills. I can also guarantee that no matter how "motivated" they may be, the resolve of a young child would lessen considerably after watching a few of their fellow attackers' faces being obliterated.
So yeah, 150 of the little bastards. Somebody set it up.
__________________
My approach would be as follows:
I'd start in a corner about 6 feet from each wall. As the kids charge me, I grab them by the back of the head and smash their faces into my knee. I would then toss their limp bodies into the corner and off to the sides against the wall. This would prevent others from sneaking in behind me. When there's no more room in the corners, I use the next wave of busted up children to build a wall in front of me, high enough so that it would be hard for the kids to climb over but not so high that I couldn't smash them in the face as they try. I'm confident that I could easily create enough blood flow to make the floor surrounding my makeshift fort extremely slippery, making for poor footing, which combined with the already poor motor skills of the children, would help my cause greatly.
Now that I type this up, it seems 100 is a low number. I bet I could annihilate at least 150. I would only be limited by my stamina. Even though I don't smoke or drink and I'm in great physical condition, I am going to be 50 in the Spring and I have to think that fatigue would start to set in after about 15 minutes. Even then, it would be tough for five year olds to k.o. me no matter how many there were. First, as previously mentioned, they lack the strength and motor skills. I can also guarantee that no matter how "motivated" they may be, the resolve of a young child would lessen considerably after watching a few of their fellow attackers' faces being obliterated.
So yeah, 150 of the little bastards. Somebody set it up.
__________________
Godsfavoritedog, I like your plan. I'll see if i can get the gym in Albuquerque lined up again. Local media, some of the playerz to book the side bettors. No toeing the OB lines though, OK?
