How many people think Iraq is the biggest threat to American security?

SmashMouth

Registered User
Forum Member
Oct 12, 2001
3,880
0
0
53
Long Branch Nj
I'm all for a strong military. I'm all for protecting our country and defending our interests abroad. That said, I'm not all for us going to war for the sake of going to war. No matter what the United Nations comes up with, we are going to attack Iraq.
No matter what the world thinks of us we are going to war and people on both sides are going to die. Al Qaeda? We abandoned that ship already. These guys are the threat, in ase anyone forgot they did attack us. They are still alive and well, and attacking innocent people. Instead of finishing that job, baby bush wants to finish his dad's job for him. Now it's a possibility we could nuke Iraq? This guy is nuts. The terrorists are still out there but he has tunnel vision for Saddam. How many Iraqi's were on those planes that attacked us? None. All Saudi's and Egyptian's. Is it me or is Bush looking a little to anxious to go to war?
 

Penguinfan

Thread banned
Forum Member
Dec 5, 2001
10,393
190
0
Vanished into vortex
I for one do not think that Iraq is the biggest threat, however I do think they are a threat and need dealt with accordingly. I was in a discussion/argument with a fellow a few weeks back who claimed we had no right threatening Iraq until they acted first. Well, I disagree with that, we knew all along that Bin Laden was a threat and waited for him to act first and look what happened. My opinion on how to deal with situations like this has been mostly formed since 9-11 I must admit, but I feel like we must defend/protect our own even if it means more drastic methods. I am not in favor of nuking anybody, but if absolute need be then.....


just my opinion
penguinfan
 

dr. freeze

BIG12 KING
Forum Member
Aug 25, 2001
7,170
8
0
Mansion
right now these fools are spending all their energy and time trying to figure out what Trent Lott's remarks meant.....unreal....some people just love to stir up hate amongst ourselves and will use any means to do so

i couldn't believe what i was hearing either about a nuclear attack.....probably just thrown out there to discourage Hussein from gassing our troops.....

iraq is a threat, Saudi is a threat, N Korea is a threat, China is a threat, Libya is a threat, every militant muslum nation is a threat.....we are not living in a peaceful era at all......enemies far outnumber our friends.....not sure what we can do at this point......any ideas?
 

SmashMouth

Registered User
Forum Member
Oct 12, 2001
3,880
0
0
53
Long Branch Nj
I agree with you both that Iraq is a threat. I just don't think they are even close to the top priority. I also hate the Trent Lott thing. I hate partisan politics. He is a dumb hick who made a dumb hick comment. Let the voters sort it out. End of story. For the democrats to run with it sucks. If it were a dem who made the comments the republicans would run with it too though.
 

AR182

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 9, 2000
18,654
87
0
Scottsdale,AZ
Concerning Lott's statement:

First off nobody is asking Lott to resign from the senate but for him to step down as majority leader. This is not only coming from the liberal dems, but also from some consevative people as well.

Originally I didn't think much about Lott's "toast" to Strom. But as the day went by I started hearing stories about his connection years ago to a right wing organization that breached segregationalist views. He also made almost the same exact toast to Strom about 20 years ago. The people that are defending Lott keeping stating that he has changed over the years & have done things to help the African- American cause. IMO it doesn't matter if he has changed. What does matter is that as a leader of a political party, Lott should have known better than to make such a public mistake.The republicans for years have been accused that they don't have any sympathy for minorities & that they only cater to the wealthy. By Lott stepping down it will show the republican's critics wrong, if he doesn't it may hurt them in future elections.

BTW, I am neither a republican or a democrat.
 
B

Billy

Guest
The biggest threat to American security is the American politicians
...............IMHO................:(
 

SmashMouth

Registered User
Forum Member
Oct 12, 2001
3,880
0
0
53
Long Branch Nj
Just my opinion,but being that there are over a billion muslims in the world, and alot of them who are extremists who hate us, starting a war that most of the world except Israel an Gb view as unprovoked might not be in the best interest of national security.
 

dr. freeze

BIG12 KING
Forum Member
Aug 25, 2001
7,170
8
0
Mansion
you don't do things to prove your critics wrong.....you do things cuz its the right thing to do.....

republicans want Lott to step down because in doing so it will "prove" that they are the party for everyone....good grief....that is pathetic....in other words, they want him to step down so they get more votes.....that sickens me as much as anything Clinton did.....

i really doubt he intended to infer anything racist.....he was speaking of Thurmond and trying to honor the guy's political career....thats it....maybe not, but thats how i see it....

i would rather people do things cuz that is the right thing to do rather than to do things cuz that is the politically correct thing to do.....used to be Republicans were like this but they are changing.....
 

SmashMouth

Registered User
Forum Member
Oct 12, 2001
3,880
0
0
53
Long Branch Nj
Freeze both parties have been like this forever. Very rare that anyone makes it to the forefront of their party with good intentions. They are too involved withspecial interests.
 

djv

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 4, 2000
13,817
17
0
Iraq is a cake walk for us. Wow I said that. Yup no worse then 1991. Now N Korea well we lost estimate 45000 folks there once before. And if the chit gets going there again. Well it wont be 45000 because were smarter. But it will be bigger number then Iraq much bigger. That is why when you watch the boys from the white house say. We will use all options other them miltary with N korea or words to that affect. They know to who the bigger threat is. But there not going to say that right now. They have there heads so buried in Iraq they cant chit streight. N Korea can wait unless they start something. They have no Oil.
 

THE KOD

Registered
Forum Member
Nov 16, 2001
42,564
315
83
Victory Lane
djv said:
Iraq is a cake walk for us. Wow I said that. Yup no worse then 1991. That is why when you watch the boys from the white house say. We will use all options other them miltary with N korea or words to that affect. They know to who the bigger threat is. But there not going to say that right now. They have there heads so buried in Iraq they cant chit streight. N Korea can wait unless they start something. They have no Oil.

I am sorry to disagree with you but I cant help but say something. I know this is politics and a no win situation but as drfreeze would say.....listen to reason you imbecile.

First of all we have to go into Iraq. If we do not dont you realize that a dirty nuke will be coming to a city near you ? And Saddam will be behind it working closely with Terror groups.

We didnt think 911 would happen now did we huh.

And you dont want any nukes huh. Well let me tell you this. He has the power to let loose some biological chit that we dont want to be messing around with. We are talking world health implications or worse. Got your small pox vacine yet ? you may want to think about getting that. This guy is a nut.

If he does that there must be consequences. and the only thing he knows is ,,,,, look you will die we will make sure of that.

You know you are dealing with a terrible person when they could not even call him to the UN to talk to him. No way that was happening. So what kind of a world leader is that I ask you ?

I wonder if there is more behind the ship missle thing that meets the eye. If they were legitimate why were they hiding them? and why did they lie about it when the ship was boarded. There may be alot going on we dont know about behind the scenes.

Scott-Atlanta
 

djv

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 4, 2000
13,817
17
0
Scott when I see proof there getting ready to use some device here in America. All americans will stand up and join. Right now we have nothing.
The only ones so far to do anything have been the Saudis. Iraq has done nothing. Read Nolans artical in the other post on this subject. There you can read why we are where were at. All the screw ups of 1991. Hey when us Americans found out all the real truth after that war. Well we did the right thing we thru Bush Senior the hell out of the office. And we should have. Now lets see if JR is smarter the the old man. Lets watch out For NKorea. They do like to attack. As I said we lost over 45000 there once before. Lets get some real pressure on Suadi. Either they help control the money flow or lets take em out. They did more to us then Iraq has.
 

Stuman

Banned
Forum Member
Nov 5, 2002
800
0
0
Memphrica, Tennessee
I think there is a lot going on behind the scenes that the public doesn't know about. When you think about it, we are one of the most technically advanced countries in the world. The way that our technology has evolved over the past 10 years is staggering. No one but the most extreme inside military people knows what intelligence methods we are using today, but you can bet they are using stuff that is advanced way beyond public knowledge.

With that being said, I think our intelligence groups have a pretty good idea of what is going on over there. I mean, we already watch every move they make from that big eye in the sky, and that is old technology. And another thing, a lot of people here act like (or it seems like that to me) the president is calling all the shots with Iraq. He has all kinds of analysts and advisors who are making most of these decisions. I'm sure he has ample input into the decisions that are made, but he is by no means "calling all the shots". Therefore, why should we be placing all the blame on our presidents shoulders for our military actions? :shrug:

Comments / Flames incouraged! :grins:

Stuman
 

Nolan Dalla

Registered User
Forum Member
Sep 7, 2000
1,201
2
0
Washington, DC/Las Vegas, NV
****From Nolan: Interesting comments. I read this thread with great interest and there are a number if issues here worth debating. However, I would like to respectfully go over your points and offer some feedback. Naturally, I welcome your reply and rebuttle.


Stuman said:
I think there is a lot going on behind the scenes that the public doesn't know about. When you think about it, we are one of the most technically advanced countries in the world. The way that our technology has evolved over the past 10 years is staggering. No one but the most extreme inside military people knows what intelligence methods we are using today, but you can bet they are using stuff that is advanced way beyond public knowledge.

***I would agree with this statement in terms of military capabilities. No question that the US military is by far the surerior world power with no nation even remotely close. However, in terms of the intelligence operations in this country, this is one of the most ineffective, bloated bureacracies in modern times. Time and time again the intelligecne community has FAILED the American people. Even worse, there has been NO ACCOUNTABILITY for these failures. No, it's not Clinton's fault. This is a bi-partisan issue. Between the NSA, the CIA, DIA, and the fat, lazy-assed bureacracies that call themselves "the intelligence community" for the most part these agencies have floped and failed over and over. If HUD were wasting this kind of money and we were getting so little in return, fiscal conservatives would be up in arms. Instead, we increase the intelligecne budget every year above and beyond the incremental expasnion levels of government. I'll tell you what those agencies have for the most part -- lazy, coffee drinking bureacrats who write reports and memos to each other on the labor situation in Chile. CNN and academia are doing the same thing, providing the same services at a fraction of the cost. It's a shame.


With that being said, I think our intelligence groups have a pretty good idea of what is going on over there. I mean, we already watch every move they make from that big eye in the sky, and that is old technology.

***I strongly disagree. Our lack of real HUMAN intelligence is mind-boggling. Sure, we have photos of mountains and can track movemetns, but the REAL value of intelligecne comes in ANTICPATING the adversarial actions of your enemy. HUMAN intelligence, not technical superiority is what we sorely need. This point is essentially undisputeable, as even memeber sof the intelligecne community have complained about our lack of reliable on-the-ground resources and contacts. Which leads me to ask -- WHAT THE FAWK HAVE THESE IDIOTS BEEN DOING EVERY YEAR WITH OUR TAX DOLLARS (60-70 billioin annually)? Sure, spending money on satellites is fine. But how about hiring a couple of Arab speaking spies to infiltrate Al Queda? Too damn busy paying $85,000 a year to "analysists" writing those fascinating labor reports on Chile, I supppose.


And another thing, a lot of people here act like (or it seems like that to me) the president is calling all the shots with Iraq. He has all kinds of analysts and advisors who are making most of these decisions.


***I agree with this point.

I'm sure he has ample input into the decisions that are made, but he is by no means "calling all the shots". Therefore, why should we be placing all the blame on our presidents shoulders for our military actions? :shrug:

***I'm not blaming the President, although I do NOT support this Adminstration. I blame a woefully ineffective system that has continuinlly failed us time and time again. These "experts" in the intelligence field completely missed the boat on the fall of Communism ten years ago. They were sititng in their offices on their fat asses watching the fall of the Berlin wall on CNN along with the rest of us (I woked for the State Department at the time -- goddamn I want to write a book about what I saw from our diplomatic corps....and by the way I was a very low level amployee who had just started out in Adminstration so I had no sayso about these critical issues). They were huslting off memos to each other "informing" each department about the latest developments, when all you had to do was turn on the fawking TV set! Nicolae Ceasescu was overthrown and the jerks at the Embassy in Bucharest were all on the second floor waiting for a calbe from Washington on what to do. These small incidents are played out hundreds of times across the board in all countries. The situation in Washington is even worse. Intelligence had no idea where Al Queda was, nor could they track Bin Laden. They still don't even know if the leader is alive. The INS is cutting back staff -- meanwhile the intelligence community gets every dollar they ask for (their budget is SECRET by the way -- what I estimated earlier was just the figure according to speculation). Those billion dollar spy satellites sure are doing us a lot of good. -- Nolan
 

dr. freeze

BIG12 KING
Forum Member
Aug 25, 2001
7,170
8
0
Mansion
there is absolutely no substitute for human intelligence......unfortunately we now have 3 fat cops sitting in every grocery store thanks to Clinton......while the CIA budget has been all but raped
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top