HOW THE HELL CAN ANYONE TAKE SF???

T

Theboundbook

Registered User
Forum Member
Jan 16, 2002
32,998
25
0
55
Salt Lake City, Utah
IT WOULD BE IMPOSSIBLE FOR THEM TO COVER.. Which makes me like SF, but Im not that ballsy... THEY SUCK... And N.O. looked like they weren't all together, but so did SD last week against my boys.... and we saw what they did last night...

VEGAS shit the bed on the line, right????

I think they win by double d's no matter what...

And even if Vegas had a trick up their sleave with some refs giving away fantasy pass interferences to help SF, they STILL LOSE... So tease is impossible to lose.... RIGHT???

Is there anyone here that can TRY TO CONVINCE me with some logical (illogical) reason why to take SF???? (besides that world has N.O. and line isnt moving which hits 90% of the time it seems *1 out of 10 happened with SD last night)
 
HUDSON

HUDSON

Registered User
Forum Member
Apr 28, 2008
24,762
43
0
49
Sportsbook
Home dogs went 3-0-1 yesterday.....I so DOUBT all home dogs cover in Week 2. Saints roll here.....:00hour
 
E

elmer fudd

Registered User
Forum Member
Jun 6, 2010
22,274
65
48
U.S.A.
saints roll 27/13...:00hour

better qb/team..even the refs can't fvck this one up!!!! can they???
 
D

Dead Money

Registered User
Forum Member
Sep 15, 2005
4,350
64
0
Upstairs watching sports on the big TV.
SF+

SF+

game 2 for both..

New Orleans is champ and beat old man Farve on first game back.

SF walked into game 1 vs newly coached inspired team at home openner. What did Seattle do yesterday? What did Vikes do?

Think home openner SF+ and under...
 
G

Glenn Quagmire

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 15, 2005
7,067
0
0
Love SF here. I have 3U on the points and 1.5 on the ML. I don't think SF loses this game, but if they do it should be very close.

People are overreacting big time to the loss at Seattle. They looked like shit, sure, but it's only one game. They are a better team than what they showed in that game. And anyone who thought Seattle was a good team because of that win doesn't follow the Seahawks very closely. They're a bad team. Period.

That ass-kicking against the Hawks is actually part of the reason I like them tonight. They laid an egg, now they come home and play the SB champs at home on MNF. Do people really think they will lay an egg again, given everything that is on the line? NO is the better team, no doubt, but I think the situational factors point to SF.

As for the line, I don't see how it's too low. I don't care how good you are, it's hard to win on the road in the NFL. I think the line is either fair, or maybe a bit too high. Just my opinion...
 
Woodson

Woodson

L I V I N
Forum Member
Oct 23, 1999
15,513
79
48
Blockchain
I have Saints -5 and San Francisco +12.5

With 6, 7, 10 being differentials, I like my chances.

Winner either way but would love a middle with Saints winning by 6-12.

:0074
 
ldabdou

ldabdou

Chillaxin
Forum Member
Dec 28, 2004
9,311
66
48
Nor Cal
Glenn Quagmire said:
Love SF here. I have 3U on the points and 1.5 on the ML. I don't think SF loses this game, but if they do it should be very close.

People are overreacting big time to the loss at Seattle. They looked like shit, sure, but it's only one game. They are a better team than what they showed in that game. And anyone who thought Seattle was a good team because of that win doesn't follow the Seahawks very closely. They're a bad team. Period.

That ass-kicking against the Hawks is actually part of the reason I like them tonight. They laid an egg, now they come home and play the SB champs at home on MNF. Do people really think they will lay an egg again, given everything that is on the line? NO is the better team, no doubt, but I think the situational factors point to SF.

As for the line, I don't see how it's too low. I don't care how good you are, it's hard to win on the road in the NFL. I think the line is either fair, or maybe a bit too high. Just my opinion...
Click to expand...

Good point!
 
T

Theboundbook

Registered User
Forum Member
Jan 16, 2002
32,998
25
0
55
Salt Lake City, Utah
I totally appreciate and respect all of you who are on SF... But I AM NOT CONVINCED yet... N.O. just seems like an easy 28-6 win... maybe more! (though I like NO and under on a teaser....)
 
G

Glenn Quagmire

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 15, 2005
7,067
0
0
Theboundbook said:
I totally appreciate and respect all of you who are on SF... But I AM NOT CONVINCED yet... N.O. just seems like an easy 28-6 win... maybe more! (though I like NO and under on a teaser....)
Click to expand...

If you look at this game from an x's and o's standpoint, you're probably never going to be convinced. NO is the better overall team and they have a better offense (although SF has the better D), so I understand why people are on NO.

I can't speak for other SF bettors, but I put a lot of weight into situational factors when I cap games. IMO, those favor SF tonight, even if they aren't the better team on paper.

GL with whatever your play.
 
E

elmer fudd

Registered User
Forum Member
Jun 6, 2010
22,274
65
48
U.S.A.
gotta say no rolls..alex smith is terrible and he WILL NOT be able to throw the ball tonite..gore won't run for many yards either..:toast:
 
G

Glenn Quagmire

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 15, 2005
7,067
0
0
elmer fudd said:
gotta say no rolls..alex smith is terrible and he WILL NOT be able to throw the ball tonite..gore won't run for many yards either..:toast:
Click to expand...

Why don't you think Gore will run for many yards? He's one of the better RBs in the league, and NO had the 21st ranked run D in the league last year. This is the type of game where he should go off. :shrug:
 
gardenweasel

gardenweasel

el guapo
Forum Member
Jan 10, 2002
40,577
227
63
"the bunker"
Glenn Quagmire said:
If you look at this game from an x's and o's standpoint, you're probably never going to be convinced. NO is the better overall team and they have a better offense (although SF has the better D), so I understand why people are on NO.

I can't speak for other SF bettors, but I put a lot of weight into situational factors when I cap games. IMO, those favor SF tonight, even if they aren't the better team on paper.

GL with whatever your play.
Click to expand...

o.k.,g.quag....you convinced me.....not MY posted play....i`m riding g.quag`s nuts for a small wager....


if it hits,be prepared for some new found notoriety....i`ll scream your name from the mountain tops......

:director: G, QUAG !!...G.QUAG !!!!

of course if it loses,i`ll nag you into a bleeding ulcer

LET THE GAMES BEGIN !!!
 
Last edited:
G

Glenn Quagmire

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 15, 2005
7,067
0
0
gardenweasel said:
o.k.,g.quag....you convinced me.....not MY posted play....i`m riding g.quag`s nuts for a small wager....


if it hits,be prepared for some new found notoriety....i`l scream your name from the mountain tops......

:director: G, QUAG !!...G.QUAG !!!!

of course if it loses,i`ll nag you into a bleeding ulcer

LET THE GAMES BEGIN !!!
Click to expand...

:wall:

Should I be concerned about a weasel "riding my nuts?" I think an ER visit will be in order very shortly.

And feel free to nag me even if it wins. I could always use a bleeding ulcer.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Bet on MyBookie
Top