but the ducks opened as a 1 point favorite. now theyre a 2' point dog and playing at home....ill bite.....
ducks 1 unit and clemson +17 1 unit...gl
ducks 1 unit and clemson +17 1 unit...gl
I could be wrong
- Thread starter Crazy888
- Start date
:director: QUACK QUACK QUACK
gotta love those faves bet to dogs....especially at home....congrats to all the duck backers
:toast: :drinky: :jump: :spotting: :Yep: :spotting: moon1
gotta love those faves bet to dogs....especially at home....congrats to all the duck backers
:toast: :drinky: :jump: :spotting: :Yep: :spotting: moon1Cal holds Ducks to 7 points through 55 minutes of the game, then falls apart and gives up 14 in the final minutes. That Tedford is a real pain in the ass, played not to lose and then lost.moon1
Congrats to you guys. Losing 17-7 late in the game and get the big come from behind win.
Congrats to you guys. Losing 17-7 late in the game and get the big come from behind win.
skillrules:
im assuming you had cal.
i had oregon myself, but unlike some -- i dont put goggles on to convince myself that just because a play wins or loses, that it was the right play. i honestly didnt have much faith in oregon coming back.
a few things of note in that 4th quarter:
* oregon allowing a touchdown on 3rd/goal from the 18 was absolutely positively inexcusable. that is terrible defensive scheming to allow that to happen
* i noticed the same thing about tedford. normally, im very conservative when it comes to late game play calling (meaning i often agree with the coaches for running the ball. sometimes, burning clock is more important than picking up 1st downs). having said that, at some point, you gotta mix in a playaction. nothing crazy. nothing down the field. just a playaction rollout where the qb can tuck it and run if its not there- essentially turning it in to a running play and burning more clock but at least having the option to pass it.
honestly, both teams defenses played very well. last 5:00 of any game always are a sweat.
definitely not one to brag about my oregon win. could have easily ended 17-14.
im assuming you had cal.
i had oregon myself, but unlike some -- i dont put goggles on to convince myself that just because a play wins or loses, that it was the right play. i honestly didnt have much faith in oregon coming back.
a few things of note in that 4th quarter:
* oregon allowing a touchdown on 3rd/goal from the 18 was absolutely positively inexcusable. that is terrible defensive scheming to allow that to happen
* i noticed the same thing about tedford. normally, im very conservative when it comes to late game play calling (meaning i often agree with the coaches for running the ball. sometimes, burning clock is more important than picking up 1st downs). having said that, at some point, you gotta mix in a playaction. nothing crazy. nothing down the field. just a playaction rollout where the qb can tuck it and run if its not there- essentially turning it in to a running play and burning more clock but at least having the option to pass it.
honestly, both teams defenses played very well. last 5:00 of any game always are a sweat.
definitely not one to brag about my oregon win. could have easily ended 17-14.
i know all to well what youre talking about skill....would be great if we all had winners every game...just get lucky sometimes i guess.....
4-0 on posted picks today....7-0 overall....didnt have time to post purdue, k st, and ark st....hope everyone had a profitable day :toast:
4-0 on posted picks today....7-0 overall....didnt have time to post purdue, k st, and ark st....hope everyone had a profitable day :toast:
unreal, i cant catch a break in this gambling bullshit, cal was out to get us, blew the game with less than a min. story of my life
i dont see my thread as bragging gman and hope u dont either...sorry if u do....was excited in won in the last minute, as most would be....and gave congratulations to all who had them....didnt mean to offend....no goggles here
crazy888:
sorry about my post. i didnt mean to indirectly refer to you at all. not one bit. thats really my fault for not being more specific as to who or whom i was referring to. it certainly wasnt you. sorry about that man. glad we both cashed oregon. take care.
sorry about my post. i didnt mean to indirectly refer to you at all. not one bit. thats really my fault for not being more specific as to who or whom i was referring to. it certainly wasnt you. sorry about that man. glad we both cashed oregon. take care.
