I will do the opposite...

[Skipper]

If two teams combine for 49 points in the first half, expect 85 in the 2nd.

If two teams combine for 76 in the first half, expect 53 in the 2nd.

So, if the first half goes under, the for the second...

<object width="560" height="315"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/RerJWv5vwxc?version=3&hl=en_US&rel=0"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/RerJWv5vwxc?version=3&hl=en_US&rel=0" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="560" height="315" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object>

 

[ppabart]

:toast: :toast: :toast:

Sound reasoning

 

[Ronnie]

Seems like all games are going that way. Look at S.Fla/Temple game last night. I'm on the over in this Marquette/Murray State game in the second half

 

[SixFive]

Ur play is Marquette/Murray State over 74

GL, Costanza!!

 

[oxnardca1]

:toast:

 

[DZ]

If two teams combine for 49 points in the first half, expect 85 in the 2nd.

If two teams combine for 76 in the first half, expect 53 in the 2nd.

A few years ago, I used to employ this methodology for Big-10 and Ivy League in-conference games, but only playing the under 2nd half under when the 1st half went over. Worked like a charm & never lost money long term over the course of three half seasons.

Love that episode of Seinfeld. Classic George. :toast: