IE2002:
About when I first became a member at Madjacks, among the archives of capping articles was an historical analysis on buying points (I believe it was NFL only and excluded NCAA) on and off key numbers (3, 7, 10, 14, 37 in totals, etc.) that covered a very large sample and showed that at 10% extra juice, buying a half point to 3 was definitely cost effective over the long haul, but not for any of the other key numbers. Of course the data is now a few years out of date, but the article was extremely interesting and well done. As I recall, the article also might have subjectively discussed/analyzed specific situations for buying points (i.e. the size of the bet, defensive vs. aggressive, etc.).
Do you remember the article, and do you have it in your archives?
Much thanks.
GL
lostinamerica
About when I first became a member at Madjacks, among the archives of capping articles was an historical analysis on buying points (I believe it was NFL only and excluded NCAA) on and off key numbers (3, 7, 10, 14, 37 in totals, etc.) that covered a very large sample and showed that at 10% extra juice, buying a half point to 3 was definitely cost effective over the long haul, but not for any of the other key numbers. Of course the data is now a few years out of date, but the article was extremely interesting and well done. As I recall, the article also might have subjectively discussed/analyzed specific situations for buying points (i.e. the size of the bet, defensive vs. aggressive, etc.).
Do you remember the article, and do you have it in your archives?
Much thanks.
GL
lostinamerica
