If you had Stanford - 4..

[bleedingpurple]

Marcus Allen cost you the push and cover, this is what the guy did in final 1:45.

Committed 2 fouls, turned the ball over that was immediately turned into 3, missed 3 free throws, including 2 with 3 seconds left. Second night in a row I was burned by a team who missed two free throws in final 8 seconds. Oh well

 

[bleedingpurple]

Hudson says it's obvious the guy clanked last 2 free throws. I didn't watch, don't people get paid to watch for suspicious activity? one would think this guy would be looked at. not saying he tanked but if people look at these things his play would raise a red flag.

 

[#cruncher]

Unreal Had no idea, quit watching midpoint second half.

 

[cavy1]

just my 2 cents not here to argue the point
they said the guy was a 53 % free shot thrower thats why they waited until he got that ball to foul him
on the throw in they covered everyone but him

i had vandy plus 4 1/2 and felt very lucky to cash that so yes bad beat

 

[edludes]

a 53% free throw shooter who made 25% when one more ices the game and covers for stanford. talk about taking the apple. luckily I bought down to three. he played an awful game to be sure.why would someone name their kid after someone famous like that. it almost deprives them of their own identity. I saw some poor bastard playing college football this year whose first and middle name was Lou Rawls whatever his last name was.if ur name is Dylan, don't name ur kid bob.if ur name is king, don't name ur kid martin luther. if ur name is lennon, pick something other than john.if u r a kennedy, don't name the kid john fitzgerald! let the kid develop his or her own identity rather than explain why he was named after lou rawls his whole effn life! ( My parents conceived me listening to him ill bet is the most likely answer.) its a free country to do stupid shit, but one should do it to them selves and not their poor kid.