Illegal immigrants will march Tuesday for rights

Spytheweb

Registered User
Forum Member
Sep 27, 2005
1,171
14
0
It was said that you can't kickout 12 million illegals, but you can fine employers who employ them. You can setup a system that makes sure that only American citizens vote in our elections. I would like to see the law changed that says if you are born here you are a American citizen to one of your parents has to be a US citizen in order for you to be a citizen. If it takes a wall on our southern border to keep people out, then built it. America is a land of laws, well it use to be, i think people who want to come here and become Americans must apply and follow the law to be admitted. Most illegals come here do not want to become Americans, do not speak english, are not immunized, commit crimes, vote in our elections. Here in Nevada they are given college scholarships over US citizens. Stop illegals now. Here's a fact for you, Mexico's main oil field is drying up, it accounts for 40% of the government's budget when it dries up we will have a failed state to our south and the human flood gates will be open. If there are 12 million here now in 10 yrs there will be 30 million. Thousands are crossing our border everyday.


http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/I/IMMIGRATION_PROTESTS?SITE=AP&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT
 

gardenweasel

el guapo
Forum Member
Jan 10, 2002
40,588
234
63
"the bunker"
well...it`s armageddon time...because i agree with much of what my "friend" is saying here...

it was fun,though...watching aging communists, doddering hippies, dumb-as-a-post che guevara groupies, illegal aliens(and some very cool mexican wrestling masks).....

my favorite? ...some old woman carrying a,"we are palestinians" sign....

as the corrupt mexican government sits back and laughs....how come the people from todays rally weren't outside the mexican embassy protesting the failure of that government to do right for the mexican people?


donde esta la migra quando lo necessitamos?
 

StevieD

Registered User
Forum Member
Jun 18, 2002
9,509
44
48
72
Boston
well...it`s armageddon time...because i agree with much of what my "friend" is saying here...

it was fun,though...watching aging communists, doddering hippies, dumb-as-a-post che guevara groupies, illegal aliens(and some very cool mexican wrestling masks).....

my favorite? ...some old woman carrying a,"we are palestinians" sign....

as the corrupt mexican government sits back and laughs....how come the people from todays rally weren't outside the mexican embassy protesting the failure of that government to do right for the mexican people?


donde esta la migra quando lo necessitamos?

I think most Americans are in agreement on this issue. But the question has to be asked is why did Bush not secure the boarders after 911?

Guys like O'Reilly, Fox News (Opinion) Channel and my good buddy GW here try to paint a picture that this is the Liberals fault. Again they try to divide us. Fact. Bush had Republicans in charge for 6 years and the problem got worse. Not only that but he had a mandate to secure the boarders. Something is very wrong here.
 

WhatsHisNuts

Woke
Forum Member
Aug 29, 2006
28,334
1,512
113
50
Earth
www.ffrf.org
But the question has to be asked is why did Bush not secure the boarders after 911?

Because that is not on his agenda. Actions speak louder than words. If you wanted to stop illegal aliens from crossing the border, it wouldn't be that hard. Build a wall, beef up border patrol, bust out a little razor wire, etc.
 

AR182

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 9, 2000
18,654
87
0
Scottsdale,AZ
i wonder why these people don't demand the same rights from the mexican gov't. that they have no right demanding from the u.s. gov't......
 
Last edited:

AR182

Registered User
Forum Member
Nov 9, 2000
18,654
87
0
Scottsdale,AZ
I think most Americans are in agreement on this issue. But the question has to be asked is why did Bush not secure the boarders after 911?

i agree 100 % with this stevie...

bush failed the same way as the planners of the iraq war failed there...

right after what happened on 9/11...all our borders should have been secured air-tight....

and as part of the planned invasion of iraq....troops should have been sent to the borders of iraq as part of the invasaion force to seal them off from outsiders...
 

DOGS THAT BARK

Registered User
Forum Member
Jul 13, 1999
19,517
212
63
Bowling Green Ky
Spy--Don't forget Hilliary's answer to illegal immigrants is for federal gov (tax payors) to give financial aid to sanctuary cities--

The vote on H R 4437

BILL TITLE: Border Protection, Antiterrorism, and Illegal Immigration Control Act

Ayes Noes PRES NV
Republican 203 17 11
Democratic 36 164 2
Independent 1
TOTALS 239 182 13



http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2005/roll661.xml
 

Chadman

Realist
Forum Member
Apr 2, 2000
7,501
42
48
SW Missouri
Wayne, what exactly do you mean by your "statement" of Hillary's? Are you saying she is suggesting these cities known to have a large illegal population (your term is sanctuary city, I believe) should receive more funding to deal with the problem? You make it sound like she is suggesting we simply fund some kind of sanctuary, which I sincerely doubt is the jist of the comment she made.

Also, I have read a lot about the concerns of many democrats about the makeup of this HUGE bill that mandates many costly programs and will increase costs of employers, as well. Not saying this is a bad bill, because honestly the past few minutes are as deeply as I've looked at it. Other comments deal with the very short time legislators had planned to discuss the legislation which has many different areas to think about - 2 hours I believe is what was alotted for the discussion. Seems like a very short time to devote to such a complex and possibly very costly bill to the American taxpayer (that you seem to worry about in the other direction).

I have never been one to overtly criticize Bush or republicans on this issue - except for the fact that I consider our borders the most important areas of Homeland Security - and republicans were in charge of both setting up the organization and running it - still are in most situations. I do think it's important for democrats to take a stand on the issue and propose legislation.
 

gardenweasel

el guapo
Forum Member
Jan 10, 2002
40,588
234
63
"the bunker"
I think most Americans are in agreement on this issue. But the question has to be asked is why did Bush not secure the boarders after 911?

Guys like O'Reilly, Fox News (Opinion) Channel and my good buddy GW here try to paint a picture that this is the Liberals fault. Again they try to divide us. Fact. Bush had Republicans in charge for 6 years and the problem got worse. Not only that but he had a mandate to secure the boarders. Something is very wrong here.

no,stevie...bush is a major league hypocrite on the border issue as it pertains to the war on terror...

a human oxy-moron....

the only problem is,the dems are taking the same position that bush is....

you have to seal the border....THEN,take care of the peripheral issues...

if the border was sealed,i think you`d find more folks amenable to amnesty.....

we agree.....this thread should be put into a time capsule....
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top