Interesting . . . . . .

lostinamerica

Registered User
Forum Member
Oct 10, 2001
7,428
215
63
Between Green Bay and Iowa City
"The boldest of the concern trolls and the boldest of the wingnuts try to explain away Palin's interview answers as being crafty or even brilliant, but that's wishful thinking. She's out of her depth and bluffing and lying non-stop.

She might pull it off, learning enough to wing her way through the debates and interviews, and stonewalling investigations until after the election at least, and brazenly lying about everything else, but that just puts her in the position of having to sell those lies for six more weeks. That's not a strong position.

And more importantly, it puts McCain in the position of having to sell those lies alongside her, alienating the pundits who used to have some inexplicable respect for his alleged integrity."

GL
 

lostinamerica

Registered User
Forum Member
Oct 10, 2001
7,428
215
63
Between Green Bay and Iowa City
The Obama campaign will remain on message: John McCain vs. Barack Obama.
One week can be a lifetime in politics. There has been one disciplined and on message campaign in all of 2008, and it's not McPalin. But this election has always been coming down to a referendum on Obama, and he has to make the final connections to close the deal, October surprises notwithstanding.



Elsewhere . . .

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0908/13579.html
"George W. Bush will continue to draw a paycheck until noon on Jan. 20, 2009. (If there is still any money left in the U.S. Treasury to pay him, that is.) But what has he been doing to earn his pay lately? Not calming fears among his fellow citizens about their life savings, that?s for sure."


GL
 

The Judge

Pura Vida!
Forum Member
Aug 5, 2004
4,909
29
0
SJO
i heard it`s nothing more than a smear chain letter sent out to e mails all over the net.
I'm calling bullshit. Whether you agree or disagree with her take, Kilkenny is a real person and I have found nothing to indicate that this is anything but the thoughts of a woman who has known Palin and followed her career for years.
 

lostinamerica

Registered User
Forum Member
Oct 10, 2001
7,428
215
63
Between Green Bay and Iowa City
Q: You say you?re sure she has experience, but again I?m just asking for an example. What experience does she have in the field of national experience.

McCain: Energy. She knows more about energy than probably anyone else in the United States of America.

http://www.crooksandliars.com/2008/...alin-has-national-security-experience-energy/




http://obsidianwings.blogs.com/obsidian_wings/2008/09/energy-expertis.html#comments

I don't think Sarah Palin had any idea what she was talking about, any more than I think John McCain had any idea what he was talking about when he said she "knows more about energy than probably anyone else in the United States of America".




Sarah Palin has this in common with Vladimir Putin: each of them enjoys a popularity based on $100/barrel oil. As former Alaska Governor Tony Knowles explained on Rachel Maddow's show just tonight, when 85% of your state's budget is oil and gas royalties, it's easy to be popular as the price hits triple digits. Neither energy expertise nor governing expertise is required.




Also, Alaska produces 20% of the USA's energy needs!

If "20%" means 7.4%.

After nonpartisan Factcheck.org pointed out Palin's error in her interview with Gibson, the governor revised her statement somewhat, limiting it to oil and gas. But data compiled by the Energy Information Administration (EIA) contradict her claim that she oversees "nearly 20 percent" of oil and gas production in the country. According to authoritative EIA data, Alaska accounted for 7.4percent of total U.S. oil and gas production in 2005.
But now you're thinking she meant just oil, right? Except: It is not even correct for Palin to claim that her state is responsible for "nearly 20 percent" of U.S. oil production. Oil production has fallen sharply in Alaska during her governorship. The state's share of total U.S. oil production fell from 18 percent in 2005 to 13 percent this year, according to the EIA.



The Obama campaign will remain on message: John McCain vs. Barack Obama.



GL
 

lostinamerica

Registered User
Forum Member
Oct 10, 2001
7,428
215
63
Between Green Bay and Iowa City
The winning campaign usually succeeds best in defining their opponent. McCain has been impulsive, petty, erratic, and angry in employing tactics rather than a strategy in lobbing spitballs at Obama, and Obama has executed a disciplined strategy of not blinking. There was never any alarm on the part of Obama and the Axelrod team that Palin or the polls or the condescension was undermining the consistent themes of the last 18 months, and events and McPalin have brought the campaign right back to where the strategy anticipated. Obama has had a good run as the voting started this week, and he can really do himself some good tonight, before Sarah Palin takes the stage to reinforce a consistent theme. Nevertheless, Barack Hussein Obama still has to make the final connections to close the deal, and there are still plenty of ways for the election to break against the junior senator from Illinois.
GL

A huge missed opportunity for Senator Obama last night. This is the way the debate could have ended:

"Senator McCain has repeated several times that I "just don't understand". Make no mistake, this isn't just a tactic, but really how McCain thinks. Anytime anyone disagrees with him, McCain believes they just don't understand. Does that sound familiar? Haven't we've had enough of those who always believe they always know best and won't take opposing views into account? Can America really survive eight more years of this belligerent attitude?"
http://www.openleft.com/showComment.do?commentId=110673

Didn't happen. :(

GL
 

lostinamerica

Registered User
Forum Member
Oct 10, 2001
7,428
215
63
Between Green Bay and Iowa City
2004 - Bush vs. Kerry:

3waybig.jpg


http://www.realclearpolitics.com/Presidential_04/chart3way.html


What will John "Country Before Politics" McCain do next? :scared :scared :scared


GL
 

redsfann

ale connoisseur
Forum Member
Aug 3, 1999
9,241
398
83
61
Somewhere in Corn Country
I'm calling bullshit. Whether you agree or disagree with her take, Kilkenny is a real person and I have found nothing to indicate that this is anything but the thoughts of a woman who has known Palin and followed her career for years.

This was in the fishwrap this AM, Judge. Spin away you Palin apologists....


Palin doesn't represent transplanted Iowan

*

By Sarah Hahn Brooks | Monday, September 29, 2008 11:23 PM CDT |
Dear Iowans,

I?m an Iowa girl at heart (raised on a Scott County hog farm just outside Davenport, educated at Luther College in Decorah), but I?ve chosen to make my home, raise my family and teach middle school English and history in Alaska. And Sarah Palin, John McCain?s pick for vice president, is my state?s governor.

I need you to listen ? as Iowans, as people who value real, honest, personal perspectives ? to what I have to say about her.

I need you to listen, Iowans, to the kind of leader Sarah Palin claims to be ? but is not ? for me as an Alaskan, as a mother, as an educator, and as a woman.

Sarah Palin claims she stands for me as an Alaskan, but 50.1 percent of us (split between a Democratic and an independent candidate) voted against her in 2006. I voted against her not because of her political affiliation, but because of her lack of experience to govern a state almost three times the size of Texas, when she had only previously worked as the mayor of a town called Wasilla ? population 6,000.

I voted against Palin because of her outspoken commitment to sacrifice as much of Alaska?s precious wilderness to development as possible. I voted against Palin because she allows her religious beliefs to shape her policy-making. I wanted a governor willing to listen to all sides ? someone who could make the best decisions based on each situation. I want the same from my president.

Sarah Palin claims she stands for me as a mother ? particularly as a mother who juggles family-nurturing with professional ambition. But please, Iowa mothers, do not fall for the publicity photos of Palin nursing her baby while she meets with McCain. Palin is not one of us. She has a nanny for her children, housekeepers for her mansion, a chef for her kitchen.

In my city ? Juneau, the state?s capital, where Palin?s mansion and office are ? daycare is so expensive that it is becoming impossible for families with young children to continue to live here. I pay $900/month for my 2-year-old to attend full-time day care. Palin has not helped alleviate these basic issues for mothers in Alaska. She won?t represent mothers across the U.S.

Sarah Palin claims she stands for me as a person who values our children?s education. In her state of the state address last January, she said Alaska needs ?kids prepared to take life?s tests.? However, as governor, she inappropriately infuses her discussion of education issues with her religious beliefs, advocating for the teaching of creationism and for funding faith-based curriculum even when public schools are in dire need. As a teacher, I have been disappointed and horrified that ? in a time when Alaska?s schools are struggling to meet adequate yearly progress, when our students? reading and math skills are falling, when our dropout rates are growing ? Sarah Palin has ignored those serious core issues in favor of her personal religious opinions.

Finally, Sarah Palin claims she stands for me as a woman. Here, the only similarity is the number of X chromosomes Palin and I possess in our bodies, and our first names. Palin stands only for women who make strictly dictated choices about their bodies, even in cases of rape or incest. She stands only for women who agree that abstinence education is the only allowable conversation in schools.

When I voted for governor in 2006, I voted for a candidate who happened to be a man. I never thought, ?I should vote for Palin because we?re both women.? The candidate for whom I voted advocated for women ? all women ? and had a history of doing so. That is the kind of person who stands for me as a woman.

Sarah Palin is a perilous addition to the McCain ticket. She does not stand for me.

In November, vote not for X chromosomes, but for honest advocacy ? for all of us.

Sarah Hahn Brooks was raised on a farm near Walcott, Iowa. She attended Walcott Elementary and Junior High, and graduated from Davenport West High School in 1995.
 

lostinamerica

Registered User
Forum Member
Oct 10, 2001
7,428
215
63
Between Green Bay and Iowa City
Make-Believe Maverick
McCain First

http://www.rollingstone.com/news/story/23316912/makebelieve_maverick/print

- - Ill concede the piece is one-sided to advance it's thesis, and probably has its share of erroneous and/or arguable facts and incidents. But there's enough of the real John McPalin there to further disgust me with the man and the myth.

* * * * * * * * * *


But the truth of the matter is that ambition is John McCain's basic character. Seen in the sweep of his seven-decade personal history, his pandering to the right is consistent with the only constant in his life: doing what's best for himself . . .



"He was a huge screw-off," recalls (Phil Butler, who lived across the hall from McCain at the academy). "He was always on probation. The only reason he graduated was because of his father and his grandfather ? they couldn't exactly get rid of him."

McCain's self-described "four-year course of insubordination" ended with him graduating fifth from the bottom ? 894th out of a class of 899. It was a record of mediocrity he would continue as a pilot . . .



Off duty on his Mediterranean tours, McCain frequented the casinos of Monte Carlo, cultivating his taste for what he calls the "addictive" game of craps. McCain's thrill-seeking carried over into his day job. Flying over the south of Spain one day, he decided to deviate from his flight plan. Rocketing along mere feet above the ground, his plane sliced through a power line. His self-described "daredevil clowning" plunged much of the area into a blackout.

That should have been the end of McCain's flying career. "In the Navy, if you crashed one airplane, nine times out of 10 you would lose your wings," says Butler, who, like his former classmate, was shot down and taken prisoner in North Vietnam. Spark "a small international incident" like McCain had? Any other pilot would have "found themselves as the deck officer on a destroyer someplace in a hurry," says Butler.

"But, God, he had family pull. He was directly related to the CEO ? you know?" . . .



"Thanks to my prisoner-of-war experience," McCain writes, "I had, as they say in politics, a good story to sell." And sell it he did. "Listen, pal," he told an opponent who challenged him during a candidate forum. "I wish I could have had the luxury, like you, of growing up and living and spending my entire life in a nice place like the first district of Arizona, but I was doing other things. As a matter of fact, when I think about it now, the place I lived the longest in my life was Hanoi." . . .



In congress, Rep. John McCain quickly positioned himself as a GOP hard-liner. He voted against honoring Martin Luther King Jr. with a national holiday in 1983 ? a stance he held through 1989. He backed Reagan on tax cuts for the wealthy, abortion and support for the Nicaraguan contras. He sought to slash federal spending on social programs, and he voted twice against campaign-finance reform. He cites as his "biggest" legislative victory of that era a 1989 bill that abolished catastrophic health insurance for seniors, a move he still cheers as the first-ever repeal of a federal entitlement program.

McCain voted to confirm Robert Bork and Clarence Thomas to the Supreme Court. In 1993, he was the keynote speaker at a fundraiser for a group that sponsored an anti-gay-rights ballot initiative in Oregon. His anti-government fervor was renewed in the Gingrich revolution of 1994, when he called for abolishing the departments of Education and Energy. The following year, he championed a sweeping measure that would have imposed a blanket moratorium on any increase of government oversight . . .



Over the years, John McCain has demonstrated a streak of anger so nasty that even his former flacks make no effort to spin it away. "If I tried to convince you he does not have a temper, you should hang up on me and ridicule me in print," says Dan Schnur, who served as McCain's press man during the 2000 campaign. Even McCain admits to an "immature and unprofessional reaction to slights" that is "little changed from the reactions to such provocations I had as a schoolboy." . . .



In the Senate ? where, according to former GOP Sen. Bob Smith, McCain has "very few friends" ? his volcanic temper has repeatedly led to explosive altercations with colleagues and constituents alike. In 1992, McCain got into a heated exchange with Sen. Chuck Grassley over the fate of missing American servicemen in Vietnam. "Are you calling me stupid?" Grassley demanded. "No, I'm calling you a ****ing jerk!" yelled McCain. Sen. Bob Kerrey later told reporters that he feared McCain was "going to head-butt Grassley and drive the cartilage in his nose into his brain." The two were separated before they came to blows. Several years later, during another debate over servicemen missing in action, an elderly mother of an MIA soldier rolled up to McCain in her wheelchair to speak to him about her son's case. According to witnesses, McCain grew enraged, raising his hand as if to strike her before pushing her wheelchair away . . .



Last year, after barging into a bipartisan meeting on immigration legislation and attempting to seize the reins, McCain was called out by fellow GOP Sen. John Cornyn of Texas. "Wait a second here," Cornyn said. "I've been sitting in here for all of these negotiations and you just parachute in here on the last day. You're out of line." McCain exploded: "**** you! I know more about this than anyone in the room." The incident foreshadowed McCain's 11th-hour theatrics in September, when he abruptly "suspended" his campaign and inserted himself into the Wall Street bailout debate at the last minute, just as congressional leaders were attempting to finalize a bipartisan agreement.

At least three of McCain's GOP colleagues have gone on record to say that they consider him temperamentally unsuited to be commander in chief. Smith, the former senator from New Hampshire, has said that McCain's "temper would place this country at risk in international affairs, and the world perhaps in danger. In my mind, it should disqualify him." Sen. Domenici of New Mexico has said he doesn't "want this guy anywhere near a trigger." And Sen. Thad Cochran of Mississippi weighed in that "the thought of his being president sends a cold chill down my spine. He is erratic. He is hotheaded."

McCain's frequently inappropriate humor has also led many to question his self-control. In 1998, the senator told a joke about President Clinton's teenage daughter at a GOP fundraiser. "Why is Chelsea Clinton so ugly?" McCain asked. "Because her father is Janet Reno!" . . .



GL
 

lostinamerica

Registered User
Forum Member
Oct 10, 2001
7,428
215
63
Between Green Bay and Iowa City
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/223116.php
- - "(T)his week as McCain unearthed the Ayers story which, for whatever its merits, was fully aired months ago and has no clear relation to the particulars of October other than McCain's collapsing poll numbers. He's on it. Palin's on it. He's releasing slashing new TV ads like this one. Both of them are ginning their crowds up into spiraling gyres of right-wing delirium -- a ready-made Lord of the Flies (and let's admit that's a gentle allusion, given the tone of these barnburners) if Obama happened into one of the auditoriums at the wrong moment.

He ever swaggered on for a couple days about how he was going to 'take the gloves off' when he met up with Obama in Nashville. But when the two of them were there in each others physical presence ... nothing. By a myriad of gestures and reactions Obama owned him.

Nor is it a matter of shifting off the tactics, because as soon as McCain made his hasty retreat from the stage at Debate #2 he was right back at it. In every other aspect of life, high and low, refined and unlovely, we have a word for that kind of behavior: cowardice.

And now Obama can lightly taunt McCain with that very cowardice, his inability to just say it to his face. And if my take on the inner workings of McCain's mind at the moment is right that should simply unhinge him even more."



So . . . McCain and Palin and all their minions are screaming, and waving their arms to look over here, and look away from the teetering economy that the whole world is obsessed with; then a few quiet comments from Obama are much more likely to define the exchange, and McCain is fairly close to becoming completely unhinged. It's about time for the stories to emerge of Obama dealing drugs in his youth . . . And, "God Damn America."



One week can be a lifetime in politics. There has been one disciplined and on message campaign in all of 2008, and it's not McPalin. But this election has always been coming down to a referendum on Obama, and he has to make the final connections to close the deal, October surprises notwithstanding.
The Obama campaign will remain on message: John McCain vs. Barack Obama.
The winning campaign usually succeeds best in defining their opponent. McCain has been impulsive, petty, erratic, and angry in employing tactics rather than a strategy in lobbing spitballs at Obama, and Obama has executed a disciplined strategy of not blinking. There was never any alarm on the part of Obama and the Axelrod team that Palin or the polls or the condescension was undermining the consistent themes of the last 18 months, and events and McPalin have brought the campaign right back to where the strategy anticipated. Obama has had a good run as the voting started (in September) . . . Nevertheless, Barack Hussein Obama still has to make the final connections to close the deal, and there are still plenty of ways for the election to break against the junior senator from Illinois.


GL

*************************

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bnhmByYxEIo
 

The Judge

Pura Vida!
Forum Member
Aug 5, 2004
4,909
29
0
SJO
Interesting indeed . . . . . .

Interesting indeed . . . . . .

Only Sadness about Troopergate

By: George Harris
Kansas City Star


For Obama supporters there should be no satisfaction in the report released today.

Investigator Stephen Branchflower concluded that Sarah Palin violated state ethics law prohibiting public officials from using their office for private gain.

Republicans dismiss the report as political, but a panel of 10 Republicans and 4 Democrats agreed to release the report.

It's not surprising that a government official would use her power to advance a personal grudge.

And it's not surprising that Governor Palin would deny to Alaskans and to the nation that personal matters were a factor in her decision to fire Public Safety Commissioner Walt Monegan.

Nor is it surprising, really, that Palin would refuse to cooperate with an investigation after she had said she would.

And it's not really too shocking that Governor Palin would go around the country claiming that Senator Obama is the one who can't be trusted. Maybed I'm too jaded to care about any of this.

What is sad is that John McCain selected this woman to run as his vice-presidential candidate and he built a campaign around her as it became obvious that she was unfit for the office. Even as he breyed "Country First."

Give him the benefit of the doubt that when he selected her he didn't believe the Troopergate charges, as naive as that seems. Maybe his staff conducted an incompetent screeing, too.

But later he condoned her attempts at cover-up and sanctioned and repeated her intimations that Obama was somehow invidiously associated with a domestic terrorist.

Sure, McCain and Palin both said (one with a wink) that the issue was whether Obama was being truthful about his connection to William Ayers. But they both knew that they were stoking flames of hatred toward Obama and that they were trying to brand him as traitorous.

Today, finally, McCain attempted to restore some of his honor by rejecting a woman's statement at a rally accusing Obama of being an "Arab"...code for terrorist. This is the John McCain I used to admire.

It's the McCain who rejected hatred toward Mexican immigrants, even those illegally here.

It's the John McCain who made the mistake of lying for personal ambition in campaign 2000 but publicly admitted it and moved on.

John McCain could have engaged in an extended, thoughtful campaign against Democrat Obama by talking about national defense, the war in Iraq, and economic turmoil, with or without the many town hall meetings McCain wanted and Obama rejected.

But he didn't choose to do this.

The country will move on. The next president will fight terrorists somewhere. The economy will revive. But can John McCain, if miraculously elected, ever make a large segment of the populace believe that he has enough honor left to admire.

After a long and interesting life with much service and sacrifice, John McCain's legacy will be tainted by his willingness to allow an unworthy surrogate to suggest that an opponent is a traitor.
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top