Iraq to revive oil deal with China

Spytheweb

Registered User
Forum Member
Sep 27, 2005
1,171
14
0
Sun Aug 10, 3:26 PM ET

BAGHDAD - Iraq and China are set to revive a $1.2 billion oil deal that was canceled after the 2003 U.S.-led invasion, the Iraq's oil ministry said Sunday.

An initial agreement with China is expected to be signed at the end of August to develop the billion-barrel Ahdab oil field south of Baghdad, the ministry said in a statement.

"Iraq and China are keen to show their cooperation by finalizing an agreement on developing the Ahdab oil field," it said.

The announcement came after a meeting between Iraqi Oil Minister Hussain al-Shahristani and China's ambassador to Baghdad.

No further details were released, but if the deal is signed it will be the first Saddam Hussein-era oil deal to be honored by the new Iraqi regime.

In 1997, Saddam's government signed an agreement with the state-owned China National Petroleum Corp., despite United Nations sanctions that barred direct dealings with Iraq's oil industry.

The two countries restarted talks in October 2006.

The field is located near Wasit province, about 100 miles southeast of Baghdad, and could produce an estimated 115,000 barrels a day. Wasit has been the scene of sporadic attacks since the U.S.-led invasion in 2003.

Iraq sits on more than 115 billion barrels of oil but decades of wars, U.N. sanctions, violence and sabotage have battered its oil industry.

As security improves, Iraq is trying to bring in foreign companies to help increase crude output from the current 2.5 million barrels a day to 3 million barrels a day by the end of 2008, and 4.5 million barrels a day by the end of 2013.

A number of companies say they signed deals with Saddam's regime and demand that those be honored, or the countries involved be given priority on new agreements.

The ministry has consistently denied giving any advantage to companies with which Saddam signed deals, instead insisting that oil and gas fields and exploration blocks will be offered up for bids.

1374093.800042.jpg
 

gardenweasel

el guapo
Forum Member
Jan 10, 2002
40,587
234
63
"the bunker"
Sun Aug 10, 3:26 PM ET

BAGHDAD - Iraq and China are set to revive a $1.2 billion oil deal that was canceled after the 2003 U.S.-led invasion, the Iraq's oil ministry said Sunday.

An initial agreement with China is expected to be signed at the end of August to develop the billion-barrel Ahdab oil field south of Baghdad, the ministry said in a statement.

"Iraq and China are keen to show their cooperation by finalizing an agreement on developing the Ahdab oil field," it said.

The announcement came after a meeting between Iraqi Oil Minister Hussain al-Shahristani and China's ambassador to Baghdad.

No further details were released, but if the deal is signed it will be the first Saddam Hussein-era oil deal to be honored by the new Iraqi regime.

In 1997, Saddam's government signed an agreement with the state-owned China National Petroleum Corp., despite United Nations sanctions that barred direct dealings with Iraq's oil industry.

The two countries restarted talks in October 2006.

The field is located near Wasit province, about 100 miles southeast of Baghdad, and could produce an estimated 115,000 barrels a day. Wasit has been the scene of sporadic attacks since the U.S.-led invasion in 2003.

Iraq sits on more than 115 billion barrels of oil but decades of wars, U.N. sanctions, violence and sabotage have battered its oil industry.

As security improves, Iraq is trying to bring in foreign companies to help increase crude output from the current 2.5 million barrels a day to 3 million barrels a day by the end of 2008, and 4.5 million barrels a day by the end of 2013.

A number of companies say they signed deals with Saddam's regime and demand that those be honored, or the countries involved be given priority on new agreements.

The ministry has consistently denied giving any advantage to companies with which Saddam signed deals, instead insisting that oil and gas fields and exploration blocks will be offered up for bids.

1374093.800042.jpg

thats impossible......this was a war for oil.....we`re keeping it all for ourselves...:rolleyes:

n`est-ce pas?...

btw,by the end of this year,iraq`s oil output will surpass pre-war saddam`s output....

.http://rinf.com/alt-news/business-news/iraq-oil-production-rises-to-24m-barrels-a-day/2347/

it`s so nice to see all this b.s. propaganda finally kicked to the curb...thanks for helping dispel the myths......
 
Last edited:

kosar

Centrist
Forum Member
Nov 27, 1999
11,112
55
0
ft myers, fl
thats impossible......this was a war for oil.....we`re keeping it all for ourselves...:rolleyes:

It's funny how comments on this subject can take a 180 from post to post from people like you.

You mock the very notion of a war for oil one minute, and then tell us how important it is to have a foothold in the region because of oil the next. :rolleyes:

btw,by the end of this year,iraq`s oil output will surpass pre-war saddam`s output....

This is some damn exciting news! I just audibly cheered!

Any word on their water or electricity?
 

BobbyBlueChip

Trustee
Forum Member
Dec 27, 2000
20,781
353
83
53
Belly of the Beast
It's funny how comments on this subject can take a 180 from post to post from people like you.

You mock the very notion of a war for oil one minute, and then tell us how important it is to have a foothold in the region because of oil the next. :rolleyes:

Wwe don't even need their oil. We got reserves and reserves 10 feet off of our coasts. If only the Democrats haven't controlled everything for the last 10 years
 

Spytheweb

Registered User
Forum Member
Sep 27, 2005
1,171
14
0
thats impossible......this was a war for oil.....we`re keeping it all for ourselves...:rolleyes:

n`est-ce pas?...

btw,by the end of this year,iraq`s oil output will surpass pre-war saddam`s output....

.http://rinf.com/alt-news/business-news/iraq-oil-production-rises-to-24m-barrels-a-day/2347/

it`s so nice to see all this b.s. propaganda finally kicked to the curb...thanks for helping dispel the myths......

China is getting all of our money, why shouldn't they have "our oil" too.

D46-AFR.jpg
 

Spytheweb

Registered User
Forum Member
Sep 27, 2005
1,171
14
0
Wwe don't even need their oil. We got reserves and reserves 10 feet off of our coasts. If only the Democrats haven't controlled everything for the last 10 years

What makes you think that the oil here will stay here and not go on the world market to the highest bidder? Jobs don't stay here, why should the oil? Republicans didn't care about gas prices when prices were lower and they were getting kickbacks. Now that gas is up and people are pissed, plus election year, Repubs are blaming Dems for not drilling. Prices are high due to the repubs and will stay high with McCain.

D46-AFR.jpg
 

BobbyBlueChip

Trustee
Forum Member
Dec 27, 2000
20,781
353
83
53
Belly of the Beast
What makes you think that the oil here will stay here and not go on the world market to the highest bidder? Jobs don't stay here, why should the oil? Republicans didn't care about gas prices when prices were lower and they were getting kickbacks. Now that gas is up and people are pissed, plus election year, Repubs are blaming Dems for not drilling. Prices are high due to the repubs and will stay high with McCain.

D46-AFR.jpg

Your just stupid

logo.gif
 

gardenweasel

el guapo
Forum Member
Jan 10, 2002
40,587
234
63
"the bunker"
1)Wwe don't even need their oil. We got reserves and reserves 10 feet off of our coasts. 2)If only the Democrats haven't controlled everything for the last 10 years

1)http://www.kiplinger.com/businessresource/forecast/archive/The_U.S._s_Untapped_Bounty_080630.html



2)glad you`re aware that clinton vetoed an entire budget in 1995 to nullify a bill congress passed to allow drilling in anwar......

what`d he say?...

he remarked that one reason for his veto was that it would take ten years for this oil to come to market.

but now ,13 years later the anwar resource would be supplying the u.s. another 2 million barrels a day domestically....


bill`s legacy?....lol

the republican controlled congress from 2000-2006?.... why didn`t they do anything?...

because the dems filibustered to block any exploration...

more?....

""The Republican-controlled Senate passed Arctic Refuge drilling on March 16,
2005 as part of the federal budget resolution for fiscal year 2006. That
Arctic Refuge provision was removed during the reconciliation process, due
to Democrats in the House of Representatives who signed a letter stating
they would oppose any version of the budget that had Arctic Refuge drilling
in it.
On December 15, 2005 Senator Ted Stevens, a Republican from Alaska, attached
an Arctic Refuge drilling amendment to the annual defense appropriations
bill. A group of Democratic Senators led a successful filibuster of the bill
on December 21, and the language was subsequently removed."""


but,hey.you knew that...you and kosar are just feigning ignorance...and doing an excellent job,i might add......

;)
 

gardenweasel

el guapo
Forum Member
Jan 10, 2002
40,587
234
63
"the bunker"
It's funny how comments on this subject can take a 180 from post to post from people like you.

You mock the very notion of a war for oil one minute, and then tell us how important it is to have a foothold in the region because of oil the next. :rolleyes:


?

i never said we wouldn`t benefit from iraqi oil...the whole world will....as will the oppressed iraqi majority and the kurds...

they`ll reap part of the profits instead of the money going to saddam and his son`s foibles....

this oil benefits everybody because the more oil on the market...the more the price will go down....

simple supply and demand...

but,we don`t have some stranglehold on iraqi oil......

that`s some stupid slogan made up by the left....

keep hating and blaming your own country....it suits you...

lemmings...
 

The Sponge

Registered User
Forum Member
Aug 24, 2006
17,263
97
0
68 million acres of land that they still havent drilled into:shrug: But they still need more:shrug:
 
Bet on MyBookie
Top